Started By
Message
re: Ole Miss confirms text conversations happened
Posted on 5/12/16 at 3:07 pm to GeauxLax
Posted on 5/12/16 at 3:07 pm to GeauxLax
quote:
Tunsil just has to be quiet as he's out of the program.
Derrick Rose didn't talk to the NCAA after he left Memphis, so they made him retroactively ineligible, vacated all Memphis' wins and put them on probation. Didn't touch Coach Cal, though.
Posted on 5/12/16 at 3:08 pm to TampaReb
The point was that as heinous and fricked up as the Penn State situation was, the NCAA acted largely without any evidence of NCAA infractions on the part of the athletic program. They hammered Penn State basically because they were mad as hell about what had happened and didn't need evidence to do so.
If the NCAA wants to make an example out of Ole Miss, they don't need any reason to do so other than the fact that they want to.
If the NCAA wants to make an example out of Ole Miss, they don't need any reason to do so other than the fact that they want to.
Posted on 5/12/16 at 3:09 pm to TampaReb
quote:
subpoenaed by who?
Court in the civil case of Tunsil vs his stepfather.
Which is why Freeze wants to avoid being called to the stand and definitely wants the depositions sealed.
Posted on 5/12/16 at 3:12 pm to OMLandshark
quote:
Just look at Penn State.
This is a case of the NCAA pussing out. They should have gotten the Death Penalty. If we're given similar leniency, 3 lost scholarships tops.
Its quite the opposite.
The NCAA is not the court of law. There weren't NCAA rules violated at Penn St., despite the myriad of criminal activity and rampant pedophilia.
They acted far out of their normal boundaries to give them a stiff sentence (for which the retroactively reduced to not ruin current, innocent student-athletes ability to compete at a fair level).
Posted on 5/12/16 at 3:18 pm to tylerdurden24
quote:
The point was that as heinous and fricked up as the Penn State situation was, the NCAA acted largely without any evidence of NCAA infractions on the part of the athletic program. They hammered Penn State basically because they were mad as hell about what had happened and didn't need evidence to do so.
If the NCAA wants to make an example out of Ole Miss, they don't need any reason to do so other than the fact that they want to.
Yep. In the Alabama/Albert Means case, they relied very heavily on confidential, unnamed witnesses when their own rules forbade them from doing so.
If they think you're guilty and worthy of punishment, they'll just make up a way to get there as they go along.
Posted on 5/12/16 at 3:18 pm to tylerdurden24
Then why do they even have an investigation process and NOA process if none of that matters at all? Is that all for nothing? There is more structure to this then you want to believe. Schools have millions and millions at steak they are not going to just let a organization take all that away with out an structure to how and why.
Posted on 5/12/16 at 3:23 pm to TampaReb
quote:
Then why do they even have an investigation process and NOA process if none of that matters at all?
To save face, more or less. The NCAA as a whole is made up of member institutions and its committees are made up of individuals from a variety of different schools. If it doesn't present the image of a united front of member institutions policed by member institutions, then faith is lost in the system and it leaves the door open for schools to pull out and start their own league (as UGA and Oklahoma threatened to do in the 80s when the NCAA had a stranglehold on which teams got to be on TV on which days). But at the end of the day, the NCAA has guys like Emmert & Co. that have the power to make the decisions that they want to make. If they feel it benefits their future to pop the boil on their arse that is Ole Miss, they can most certainly do so without process.
ETA: Keep in mind that of all the sins you can commit against the NCAA, paying players is the capital offense (academics are almost arbitrary; the NCAA was created to preserve the idea of "amateurism" so universities could avoid having to pay out workman's comp to injured players). Not coming down hard on a University (like USCw, for example) for providing financial benefits to a player under the table undermines not only their authority but their reason for being. Given the legal climate surrounding them right now, I don't see how they can't act in harsh measure as it reinforces all that they've claimed in open court
This post was edited on 5/12/16 at 3:29 pm
Posted on 5/12/16 at 3:24 pm to TampaReb
quote:
millions and millions at steak
I thought it was lobster....
Posted on 5/12/16 at 3:24 pm to TampaReb
lol, this guy is still going. not a good day for ol' TampReb.
I hate it for you man. I really really do.
I hate it for you man. I really really do.
Posted on 5/12/16 at 3:25 pm to tylerdurden24
If you go look at the NCAAs website there is actually a penalty matrix that they work with in to determine what fits each crime. This is a concert procedure and not oh what do we want to do this time type of system. And if they break from that matrix they must explain the reasoning behind it.
It is not the free for all that you want it to be.
It is not the free for all that you want it to be.
This post was edited on 5/12/16 at 3:27 pm
Posted on 5/12/16 at 3:30 pm to TampaReb
quote:
It is not the free for all that you want it to be.
Tell that to Penn State. They might as well have gotten the death penalty and the penalties they received had nothing to do with infractions listed in the NCAA bylaws.
The NCAA went against their own bylaws in the Albert Means investigation back in 2001. They have done this multiple times because they can.
Posted on 5/12/16 at 3:33 pm to RollTide1987
The new system was put in to place in 2013.
Posted on 5/12/16 at 3:35 pm to TheRodFather
I think we may have found @DFWLANDSHARK's login here.
Posted on 5/12/16 at 3:36 pm to TampaReb
quote:
And if they break from that matrix they must explain the reasoning behind it.
Have you heard the NCAA give an explanation before? It is ALWAYS convoluted and embarrassing. Make no mistake, they are a joke of an organization but that's exactly what I'm saying should scare you right now.
quote:
If you go look at the NCAAs website there is actually a penalty matrix that they work with in to determine what fits each crime.
And it seems that said penalty matrix is working exactly as they want it to in your case. Why do you think they have to put that on their main website? It provides the illusion that there is some methodology to what they do.
quote:
not oh what do we want to do this time type of system.
Actually, that's exactly what this is. The climate around college athletics is changing so quickly that the NCAA really has no choice but to make things up on the fly. And given that everyone and their brother can see that they're in the wrong in the argument for amateurism but that the NCAA has to defend the interests of the member institutions that stand to make and keep a ton of money under the current model, they're damn sure going to act and speak and publish materials as though they're an organized unit with a rigid structure and rhyme to their reasoning.
ETA: You're basically going up against the North Korea of organizations: clearly making shite up to make themselves look bigger and better than what they are but still just powerful enough to do some damage if you give them something to sink their teeth into
This post was edited on 5/12/16 at 3:41 pm
Posted on 5/12/16 at 3:40 pm to Big Balls
quote:
See Barney next week," an apparent reference to Ole Miss assistant athletic director for high school and junior college relations Barney Farrar.
If you have university employees handing out money to student athletes, that means you're doing it wrong.
Posted on 5/12/16 at 3:41 pm to TampaReb
quote:
The new system was put in to place in 2013.
There were systems in place when Penn State and Albert Means/Alabama happened too. Here's the NCAA's attitude about situations that don't fit their rules:
Back to top



0





