Started By
Message
re: oKlAhOmA hAs ThE bEsT OfFeNsE eVeR
Posted on 12/9/18 at 11:11 pm to weremoose
Posted on 12/9/18 at 11:11 pm to weremoose
quote:
Our abortion of a spread offense with peewee players all over the field put up 31 on then. I think ya'll have a better shot than anyone so far - including Georgia.
ZACTLY!
These fools keep talking about Ole Miss........like Ole Miss wasn't the bane of Bama's existence in the SEC at their fraudulent peak. And Ole Miss didn't have any sort of running game. That was a pop gun offense.
This post was edited on 12/9/18 at 11:13 pm
2
Posted on 12/9/18 at 11:19 pm to CharlotteSooner
Bama turned the ball over 5 times Vs Ole Miss and had a batted pass bounce off a helmet.
If you win the turnover battle 5 to 0 you should win easily.
Bama had 5 turnovers vs OU in the sugar bowl as well. Neither team was able to really pull away and Bama had a chance to tie the game late in the 4th qtr.
If you are counting on 5 turnovers then you have already lost.
If you win the turnover battle 5 to 0 you should win easily.
Bama had 5 turnovers vs OU in the sugar bowl as well. Neither team was able to really pull away and Bama had a chance to tie the game late in the 4th qtr.
If you are counting on 5 turnovers then you have already lost.
Posted on 12/9/18 at 11:21 pm to CharlotteSooner
quote:
These fools keep talking about Ole Miss........like Ole Miss wasn't the bane of Bama's existence in the SEC at their fraudulent peak. And Ole Miss didn't have any sort of running game. That was a pop gun offense.
We lost to Ole Miss 2 times. The 1st was an old school SEC slugfest that they won 23-17. Thet beat us because they had a great defense, not because of offense.
The 2nd game was wild and crazy and they won the TO margin 5-0. If you win the TO margin 5-0 you too will beat us.
Posted on 12/9/18 at 11:23 pm to BhamDore
Turnovers count, whether you like it or not. Pretty sure we had something to do with all of their turnovers. They were all forced.
Posted on 12/9/18 at 11:24 pm to CharlotteSooner
So you are counting on that defense to force 5 turnovers
This post was edited on 12/9/18 at 11:25 pm
Posted on 12/9/18 at 11:26 pm to CharlotteSooner
quote:
Turnovers count, whether you like it or not. Pretty sure we had something to do with all of their turnovers. They were all forced.
Of course they count. Like we said, if we lose the TO margin 5-0 I almost guarantee OU is gonna win.
Posted on 12/9/18 at 11:26 pm to genro
No. We had six sacks as well. I'm pointing out what happens when Bama is forced into errors, and you were.
Posted on 12/9/18 at 11:27 pm to CharlotteSooner
quote:
I'm pointing out what happens when Bama is forced into errors, and you were.
5 errors to 0 we lose. We're really good but we're not good enough to overcome that.
quote:
We had six sacks as well
Good gosh that 2013 team was a paper tiger. Between our defense and O-line it's incredible we got to Auburn at 11-0.
This post was edited on 12/9/18 at 11:28 pm
Posted on 12/9/18 at 11:33 pm to SummerOfGeorge
That 2013 team were two time national champions and a kick 6 away from being a 3-peat. Don't tell me that. And we had errors of our own, just not as many.
Posted on 12/9/18 at 11:35 pm to GIbson05
Reddit spacing. Go back to r/cfb.
Posted on 12/9/18 at 11:35 pm to CharlotteSooner
quote:
Turnovers count, whether you like it or not.
OU is -2 on turnovers this year and Bama is +8. So you're fricked if you are counting on turnovers..
Posted on 12/9/18 at 11:36 pm to GIbson05
So far.
Posted on 12/9/18 at 11:36 pm to SummerOfGeorge
He doesn't understand that was an offensive Bama team with the least talent Bama has had on Defense. It also had a weak O-line. It was a senior QB and some skill players.
It was one of Saban's best coaching jobs up until the Auburn kick 6.
Since 2015 though Bama has been a different animal talent wise especially defensively. The 2017 recruiting class added ridiculous offensive personnel.
It was one of Saban's best coaching jobs up until the Auburn kick 6.
Since 2015 though Bama has been a different animal talent wise especially defensively. The 2017 recruiting class added ridiculous offensive personnel.
Posted on 12/9/18 at 11:37 pm to CharlotteSooner
quote:
That 2013 team were two time national champions and a kick 6 away from being a 3-peat. Don't tell me that. And we had errors of our own, just not as many.
We were a kick-6 away from probably/maybe beating Missouri and then definitely losing to FSU.
That was the worst post-2007 defense of the Saban era, especially in the secondary and pass rush. Our offensive line was incredibly hit or miss. Our skill guys were great, especially Coop/AJ/Yeldon/Henry when he played.
Oklahoma kicked our arse, but that team showed cracks all season. From the VT offensive disaster to the 600+ yards to Manziel to being totally dominated up front against Auburn. We ended up only playing a couple top 25 teams as the schedule collapsed. It just wasn't a championship caliber team.
This post was edited on 12/9/18 at 11:40 pm
Posted on 12/9/18 at 11:38 pm to CharlotteSooner
quote:So Bama would've won the Natty but lost to a worse team in the Sugar?
a kick 6 away from being a 3-peat
It's almost like you're saying the Sugar was a fluke
Posted on 12/9/18 at 11:38 pm to GIbson05
quote:
oKlAhOmA hAs ThE bEsT OfFeNsE eVeR
Dont worry, we heard the same thing when we played them with Bradford in the NCG.. Gator D shut em down.
Posted on 12/9/18 at 11:39 pm to BhamDore
And you don't understand that we had nowhere near what they had on either side of the ball or in any phase of the game
Posted on 12/9/18 at 11:40 pm to CharlotteSooner
quote:
And you don't understand that we had nowhere near what they had on either side of the ball or in any phase of the game
Nobody disagrees with that. That was not a great Oklahoma team.
Posted on 12/9/18 at 11:42 pm to genro
quote:
So Bama would've won the Natty but lost to a worse team in the Sugar?
Yeah I think Bama probably handles FSU in the title game. You don't?
Posted on 12/9/18 at 11:42 pm to CharlotteSooner
quote:
Yeah I think Bama probably handles FSU in the title game. You don't?
Hell no. That FSU team was nasty. They would have dominated our OL and moved the ball at will. Auburn matched up with them much better than we did up front and FSU still got them.
This post was edited on 12/9/18 at 11:44 pm
Page 3 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News