Favorite team:
Location:
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:685
Registered on:10/23/2016
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
Why do you consider these people a cancer? What information are you passing through your filter to draw that conclusion? Who is telling you that information?
Anything here is a bad investment because if you're right, you waited over 3 years to get paid, and if you're wrong, you lose.
Griggs v Duke Power Company has been disastrous for this country. This ruling means you cannot use criteria for admissions or hiring if it causes a disparate impact for a protected class.

What criteria cause disparate impact? Everything. The end result is that admissions and hiring are beholden to legal bureaucracy as opposed to any sort of objective measure.
The only principle of the left is anti-Whiteness. Even if it appears they have other principles (for example: environmentalism), they would gladly bulldoze a forest if it means they could resettle 10,000 migrants from the third world there. There is not a single anti-White policy they don't support.

Once you understand this about the left, everything makes sense. Posters in this forum and common conservative pundits love to point out democrat hypocrisy and double standards, but democrats are actually very consistent in their ideology. It just comes down to whether those conservative leaders are actually willing to acknowledge how anti-White the left is, and if we're actually willing to oppose it.
It's funny how we know the Democrat response to this. It's not about helping refugees. They hate White people. It's that simple. Every single one of their social and economic policies can be distilled down to that. If it's anti-White, they support it.
It begins with understanding the profile of your white-collar federal employee. They are risk-averse and often eschewed higher paying private sector jobs in exchange for guaranteed employment even with underperformance. Zero pressure. Never once in their career have they been asked to justify their existence. This is earth-shattering and traumatic for them.
There’s a great optics play here. For every 100B that DOGE cuts in wasteful spending, send a check out to every American.
The narrative is that OSU had all the talent but Texas made it closer with superior coaching.

Superior coaching that
- Had 1st and Goal at the 1 and turned it into 7 points for the other team, following a disastrous mind boggling sweep call

- Gave up a 75yd TD with 30 seconds left to go in the half

OFFICIAL LAUGH AT TEXAS THREAD

Posted by self_service on 1/10/25 at 9:56 pm
1st and Goal from the 1-yard line. This drive ends with the other team scoring 7 :lol: :lol: :lol:
No one knows how to run a QB sneak from the 1-yd line anymore
I was rooting for them before I saw that. Now I hope they lose.

re: Is the #5 seed the best?

Posted by self_service on 1/2/25 at 5:22 pm to
Yeah, I don’t mind an expanded playoff. I’d prefer it to meaningless bowl games where half the players opt out. The format is stupid though

Is the #5 seed the best?

Posted by self_service on 1/2/25 at 5:18 pm
You get an easy home game then get to play the weakest conference champion.
Brian Thompson is the left’s Jordan Neely. Luigi Mancione is their Daniel Penny.
AZ state literally won their conference championship
The real problem with bowl games these days is that half the players opt out. The rosters look more like spring games than an actual competition. You might not like it but it fixes a problem.