Started By
Message

re: OJ Howard Draft stock boost coming soon

Posted on 1/5/17 at 2:53 pm to
Posted by DawgsLife
Member since Jun 2013
58905 posts
Posted on 1/5/17 at 2:53 pm to
quote:

My initial reply was to the tard that said OJ sucked and only had 1600 yards receiving. It's hilarious that LSU fans would even consider busting on a TEs receiving numbers considering the numbers their eligible receivers have put up in the last 2-3 years.


Now this i can agree with.

Howard is a great TE, and considering he blocks and can catch, he will have a great career.
Posted by JuiceTerry
Roond the Scheme
Member since Apr 2013
40868 posts
Posted on 1/5/17 at 2:54 pm to
The truth is a flame. Love is a battlefield.
Posted by RB10
Member since Nov 2010
43810 posts
Posted on 1/5/17 at 2:55 pm to
quote:

truth


Posted by GnashRebel
Member since May 2015
8175 posts
Posted on 1/5/17 at 2:57 pm to
quote:

Posts like this confirm you understand very little about football.



I don't think that is fair. Bama fans are basically saying he is underutilized and if he wasn't he would be the best. How can anyone argue with that? You say that they aren't pass happy but they still managed to get the ball to some pretty good receivers over the years. They often completely ignore the guy. I think it is fair to say that based on all of the hype when he showed up that it is somewhat surprising how little he ever did other than 1 game.
Posted by cajunbama
Metairie
Member since Jan 2007
30949 posts
Posted on 1/5/17 at 2:58 pm to
4-0 against L6U


Now we dance


Posted by Cromulent
Down the Bayou
Member since Oct 2016
2797 posts
Posted on 1/5/17 at 3:00 pm to
You're no Cajun. That's blasphemy
Posted by ShreveportTiger1987
Shreveport
Member since Jan 2014
5494 posts
Posted on 1/5/17 at 3:07 pm to
Howard is a damn good te and will be a very good pro.
This post was edited on 1/5/17 at 3:10 pm
Posted by Herman Frisco
Bon Secour
Member since Sep 2008
17266 posts
Posted on 1/5/17 at 3:11 pm to
Put him on a team like New England and he could be all pro. He has the skills.
Posted by RB10
Member since Nov 2010
43810 posts
Posted on 1/5/17 at 3:12 pm to
quote:

Howard is a damn good te and will be a very good pro.


Where did I say different?
Posted by ReauxlTide222
St. Petersburg
Member since Nov 2010
83456 posts
Posted on 1/5/17 at 3:22 pm to
quote:

Would I rather have 1609 yards and 14 TDs in 36 games or 1620 yards and 6 TDs in 56 games.

Tough choice
That's pretty silly. And you're being difficult on purpose.

A LB has 100 tackles and 15 TFL
A DT has 70 tackles and 14 TFL

There's no way in hell they're producing on the same level. Position HAS to be taken into consideration. The stats in my example are a bit extreme, but the point stands.

And wasn't Howard the highest graded blocking TE in the entire country? That's a frick ton of production my man. You saying it's an easy choice is just wrong. But you know that already.
This post was edited on 1/5/17 at 3:28 pm
Posted by RB10
Member since Nov 2010
43810 posts
Posted on 1/5/17 at 3:24 pm to
quote:

That's pretty silly. And you're being difficult on purpose.

A LB has 100 tackles and 15 TFL
A DT has 70 tackles and 14 TFL

There's no way in hell they're producing on the same level. Position HAS to be taken into consideration. The stats in my example are a bit extreme, but the point stands.


There was no quantifying statement based on position. It was simply "Howard has basically been more productive" which is flat out false.

Sorry you don't like it.


ETA: What you guys are claiming is that Howard is more valuable than Dupre based on production at their given positions.

Properly convey your sentiments next time to avoid the confusion.
This post was edited on 1/5/17 at 3:30 pm
Posted by ReauxlTide222
St. Petersburg
Member since Nov 2010
83456 posts
Posted on 1/5/17 at 3:29 pm to
Bruh.
Posted by RB10
Member since Nov 2010
43810 posts
Posted on 1/5/17 at 3:31 pm to
quote:

Bruh.


What Bruh

quote:

ETA: What you guys are claiming is that Howard is more valuable than Dupre based on production at their given positions.

Properly convey your sentiments next time to avoid the confusion.


Arguing that Howard was outright more productive is ignorant.
Posted by elposter
Member since Dec 2010
24904 posts
Posted on 1/5/17 at 3:32 pm to
quote:

There was no quantifying statement based on position. It was simply "Howard has basically been more productive" which is flat out false.

Sorry you don't like it.



We are counting his blocking production which has been a key component of Alabama's rushing attack and is a key if not primary factor in evaluating TE production. We are also giving him the championship multiplier* for his production. So yeah he has easily been more productive. Sorry you don't like it.


*The championship multiplier is applied to production that leads to championships. A lesser multiplier may be applied if production led to at least a second place finish in your division.
This post was edited on 1/5/17 at 3:34 pm
Posted by RB10
Member since Nov 2010
43810 posts
Posted on 1/5/17 at 3:36 pm to
quote:

We are counting his blocking production which has been a key component of Alabama's rushing attack and is a key if not primary factor in evaluating TE production. We are also giving him the championship multiplier* for his production. So yeah he has easily been more productive. Sorry you don't like it.

*The championship multiplier is applied to production that leads to championships. A lesser multiplier may be applied if production led to at least a second place finish in your division.


And Bama fans are the ones crying about flaming in this thread.

This post was edited on 1/5/17 at 3:37 pm
Posted by ReauxlTide222
St. Petersburg
Member since Nov 2010
83456 posts
Posted on 1/5/17 at 3:40 pm to
quote:

What you guys are claiming is that Howard is more valuable than Dupre based on production at their given positions.

Properly convey your sentiments next time to avoid the confusion.
I figured the above would be understood from the get go.
Posted by JuiceTerry
Roond the Scheme
Member since Apr 2013
40868 posts
Posted on 1/5/17 at 3:43 pm to
quote:

And Bama fans are the ones crying about flaming in this thread.

You're literally the only person that has whined about flaming in this entire thread.
Posted by ReauxlTide222
St. Petersburg
Member since Nov 2010
83456 posts
Posted on 1/5/17 at 3:46 pm to
Cause he's the one of the receiving end of these cruel flames!

Oh RB10, your avi is one of my favorite pictures Gives me a chuckle every time I see it
Posted by RB10
Member since Nov 2010
43810 posts
Posted on 1/5/17 at 3:47 pm to
quote:

I figured the above would be understood from the get go.


Why would it be understood when it's not what was said?
Posted by RB10
Member since Nov 2010
43810 posts
Posted on 1/5/17 at 3:49 pm to
quote:

You're literally the only person that has whined about flaming in this entire thread.


quote:

Mic. Dropped. In a pathetic attempt to flame one of the best TEs in college football. Your middle school girl love of emojies doesn't change that.


Literally huh? Good job Terry.
This post was edited on 1/5/17 at 3:50 pm
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter