Started By
Message
re: OJ Howard Draft stock boost coming soon
Posted on 1/5/17 at 2:24 pm to BIGJLAW
Posted on 1/5/17 at 2:24 pm to BIGJLAW
quote:
It's not spin. Do you disagree that a WR should get more touches than a TE.
Personally I couldn't care less about this and that but I think you know the answer but keep on keeping on I guess.
Actually...it was spin. The statement was made that he had the same production as Dupre. He did not. He's a great TE and deserves the praise. But nothing was said about him having the same production considering he was a TE and Dupre was a WR.
Sorry. But RB10 was right.
1
Posted on 1/5/17 at 2:28 pm to JuiceTerry
quote:
Y'all are a broken fanbase. It's sad.
They don't even feel embarrassment any more.
Posted on 1/5/17 at 2:28 pm to DawgsLife
quote:
The statement was made that he had the same production as Dupre. He did not.
You're right. He clearly had more yards. Thanks for pointing that out.
Posted on 1/5/17 at 2:32 pm to ReauxlTide222
quote:
Who's production would you rather have? Howard's, or Dupree's?
Would I rather have 1609 yards and 14 TDs in 36 games or 1620 yards and 6 TDs in 56 games.
Tough choice
Posted on 1/5/17 at 2:33 pm to Tuscaloosa
quote:
What's hilarious is the attempt to flame Howard, and you got absolutely mic dropped by the Dupre comparison and now all you can do is post emojis and deflect.
Just keep telling me how much more productive Howard has been. I'll keep laughing.
quote:
Actually...it was spin. The statement was made that he had the same production as Dupre. He did not. He's a great TE and deserves the praise. But nothing was said about him having the same production considering he was a TE and Dupre was a WR.
Sorry. But RB10 was right.
Nah bro. I got "mic dropped"
This post was edited on 1/5/17 at 2:34 pm
Posted on 1/5/17 at 2:34 pm to RB10
It's sad that you're arguing a WRs receiving numbers vs a TE. Once again the point goes way over your head.
Posted on 1/5/17 at 2:36 pm to JuiceTerry
quote:
It's sad that you're arguing a WRs receiving numbers vs a TE. Once again the point goes way over your head.
You tried to flame LSU fans using Dupre and have been shite on bro.
Give it up.
Posted on 1/5/17 at 2:36 pm to RB10
Mic. Dropped.
In a pathetic attempt to flame one of the best TEs in college football. Your middle school girl love of emojies doesn't change that.
In a pathetic attempt to flame one of the best TEs in college football. Your middle school girl love of emojies doesn't change that.
Posted on 1/5/17 at 2:37 pm to Tuscaloosa
quote:
In a pathetic attempt to flame one of the best TEs in college football. Your middle school girl love of emojies doesn't change that.
Please link where I've flamed Howard. All I've done is post his stats compared to Dupre's.
You seem to be confused.
Posted on 1/5/17 at 2:37 pm to RB10
I'm feeling so much second hand embarrassment for you guys right now. It's really hard. Very sad.
Posted on 1/5/17 at 2:43 pm to JuiceTerry
Let me ask, would you take Rob Gronkowski's numbers (not this year) or Brandon Lafell's? It's not about the position as much as the Offensive scheme. I know the Gump signal went up and all the teenagers are here to take up for their beloved team, but that was a stupid statement.
Posted on 1/5/17 at 2:43 pm to JuiceTerry
Let me ask, would you take Rob Gronkowski's numbers (not this year) or Brandon Lafell's? It's not about the position as much as the Offensive scheme. I know the Gump signal went up and all the teenagers are here to take up for their beloved team, but that was a stupid statement.
Posted on 1/5/17 at 2:44 pm to Tuscaloosa
quote:
The statement was made that he had the same production as Dupre. He did not.
quote:
You're right. He clearly had more yards. Thanks for pointing that out.
Yards=all production? Dupre had quite a few more TD's. Howard had only a few more yards.
As I said. Howard is a great TE. I think he will possibly/probably go first round, and he deserves it. he is insanely talented for a TE. But, if what one of the posters said was true, (Dupre had 8 TD's more than Howard) that is clearly a lot more production than Howard getting 10 more yards.
I'm not sure where the argument is, really. It's pretty much black and white.
Posted on 1/5/17 at 2:45 pm to RB10
quote:
Please link where I've flamed Howard.
I'm still waiting....
Posted on 1/5/17 at 2:47 pm to JuiceTerry
quote:
It's sad that you're arguing a WRs receiving numbers vs a TE. Once again the point goes way over your head.
Thatw asn't the original point. Alabama fans are moving the goal posts. There was no mention in the original statements about "Considering Howard is a TE and considering he was mainly a blocker."
Durpe was more productive.
Howard is a great TE. This almost sounds like the Chubb vs. Fournette threads we all hated so much!
Posted on 1/5/17 at 2:49 pm to NamariTiger
quote:
I'm willing to bet Clemson still has not learned from that Shovel pass Pitt kicked their arse with.
So you did not watch Ohio St v Clemson?
Posted on 1/5/17 at 2:51 pm to Cromulent
My initial reply was to the tard that said OJ sucked and only had 1600 yards receiving. It's hilarious that LSU fans would even consider busting on a TEs receiving numbers considering the numbers their eligible receivers have put up in the last 2-3 years. Enjoy the game on Monday. Roll damn Tide. 
This post was edited on 1/5/17 at 2:52 pm
Posted on 1/5/17 at 2:52 pm to JuiceTerry
quote:
My initial reply was to the tard that said OJ sucked and only had 1600 yards receiving.
Where you tried to flame using Dupre, and failed.
quote:
It's hilarious that LSU fans would even consider busting on a TEs receiving numbers considering the numbers their eligible receivers have put up in the last 2-3 years.
Oh look, another flame attempt. Shocker.
Posted on 1/5/17 at 2:52 pm to JuiceTerry
It's gonna be great when OJ has another 200 yards in the NC game
This post was edited on 1/5/17 at 2:56 pm
Page 3 of 5
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News