re: Non Ole Miss & State fans, whose program if you were a fan of

quote:

---

QB-state
RB-OM
OL-OM (based on what state lost and OM returns
TE-?
WR- push, but probably OM once these freshmen receivers arrive

DL-state
LB- probably OM considering State lost everyone
Secondary- state

Punter- OM
Kicker- OM

---

Our OL will still be awesome and much better than yours

Te - State

WR - Ours will definitely be better this year

LB - I have no idea what ours or yours will be like.

As long as the two coaches remain there, State and its an easy decision.

quote:

---

Our OL will still be awesome and much better than yours

---

You do realize that you're losing 4 year starters at LT and C, which are the most important (and hardest) OL positions

And OM returns our top 8 or 9 lineman, all with playing under their belts ( mostly as redshirt and true freshmen)

OM > State as far as OL goes

quote:

---

crazy4dawgs

---

Don't use up your emoticon quota!

quote:

---

WR - Ours will definitely be better this year

---

Why? We return everyone too, except summers and have Vincent as. RS and all the freshmen coming in.

As far as a push at LB that's like saying there's a push at QB. You have no idea what you have. We return our best, 3rd, and I'm being nice on walker when I say our 5th and 6th best LB. Add in CJ and the other freshman I can't see why you wouldn't think we'd be better. That's like us saying Mackey is going to be better than Relf

At this point in time, State.

When Mullen is gone, depends on who they hire.

quote:

---

wow. you didn't watch Egg bowl at oxford? Perkins killed ole miss in open field.

---

So did my great-aunt Hazel.



Again, everyone notice that a medicore State rb having a good game against downy-soft OM defense makes him HOF eligible. Thanks for providing a sparkling example of how State fans measure success by how they do against OM.

quote:

---

wow. you didn't watch Egg bowl at oxford? Perkins killed ole miss in open field.

---

State fans, and not even most of you, are the only ones who think y'all have a better backfield than we do.

In regards to the OP. I'd say State should be a little more excited. OM should be good in '12, "13, & '14, but state should be good the next couple years, making three years in a row, where it looks like OM will be down two years in a row. If recruiting stays the same then sure OM has the brighter future, but I doubt Mullen is really this bad and expect him to bring in a good class next year. If so as long as he's at state I think they should be more excited, but if he sucks it up again crootin or leaves, then OM is very well off in comparison

Yall are forgetting Vick Ballard. He was our primary back and led the SEC in TD's most of the season. To lazy to look up if he won that title though