Started By
Message
re: No Schollies lost, 6 games "vacated", 3 more years prbation
Posted on 6/10/09 at 6:39 pm to GoBigOrange86
Posted on 6/10/09 at 6:39 pm to GoBigOrange86
We won the 2007 game!!!! Atta boy Phil!!
Get out the cigars! We just beat the hell out of you! Ramma jamma yellow hamma go to HELL alabama!!! GO BIG ORANGE!!!
Get out the cigars! We just beat the hell out of you! Ramma jamma yellow hamma go to HELL alabama!!! GO BIG ORANGE!!!
1
Posted on 6/10/09 at 6:39 pm to ole orange
quote:
We won the 2007 game!!!! Atta boy Phil!!
Get out the cigars! We just beat the hell out of you! Ramma jamma yellow hamma go to HELL alabama!!! GO BIG ORANGE!!!
Posted on 6/10/09 at 6:45 pm to neutrino
1. 3 year probation. We will appeal
2. $43,900 fine (saban has that in his wallet)
3. Vacate wins back to 2005, We will appeal.
4. No sancations.(very big deal)
5. No scholarship losses in any sports.
2. $43,900 fine (saban has that in his wallet)
3. Vacate wins back to 2005, We will appeal.
4. No sancations.(very big deal)
5. No scholarship losses in any sports.
Posted on 6/10/09 at 6:47 pm to NashvilleTider
HELL YES! 7 IN A ROW 
Posted on 6/10/09 at 6:48 pm to NashvilleTider
quote:
Vacate wins back to 2005
How does it feel to be "officially" 1-8 vs Tennessee this decade!!
Posted on 6/10/09 at 6:52 pm to ole orange
So we are .500 against Bama now, correct?
Posted on 6/10/09 at 6:52 pm to Jhag
quote:
HELL YES! 7 IN A ROW
What the hell are you talking about? This is regarding the 2007 season.
Posted on 6/10/09 at 6:53 pm to bamascott2
Posted on 6/10/09 at 6:55 pm to ole orange
I feel like I should probably repeat myself: vacating wins is not the same as forfeiting them. We still lost to Alabama in 2007. Alabama just didn't win.
Posted on 6/10/09 at 6:56 pm to Jhag
So Nick Saban's record at Bama now is 12-14?
Posted on 6/10/09 at 6:56 pm to UPT
Vacate means Bama loses credit for the win, but that's it. Opponents' records are unchanged, they keep the loss.
Posted on 6/10/09 at 6:57 pm to GoBigOrange86
quote:
I feel like I should probably repeat myself: vacating wins is not the same as forfeiting them.
Well shite, that's not fun.
Posted on 6/10/09 at 6:58 pm to bamascott2
No lost Scholarships. I'll take it. 2007 was a shitty year anyways except for the TN game which those players didn't play in. Hope we can appeal and get the probation down to 1 or 2 years.
Posted on 6/10/09 at 6:59 pm to FootballHog
quote:
So we are .500 against Bama now, correct?
No, even if you were to get credit for the win, you'd be 1 game back I believe.
Posted on 6/10/09 at 7:08 pm to NashvilleTider
quote:
4. No sancations.(very big deal)
5. No scholarship losses in any sports.
So basically this was all to do bout nothing.
Do any AU fans or I guess just sec fans think this is Fair?
Also was this within the 5 year period?Something tells me no or there would've been loss of schollys and a sanction or 2.
I am numb to the subject,but I don't want to hear about buying players and I seriously doubt bama or satan has to do this
Posted on 6/10/09 at 7:23 pm to WarEagleTwentyFour
I'll accept this, but what I want to know is why we have to vacate all 2007 regular season wins. None of the accussed players played in the Tennessee game.
Posted on 6/10/09 at 7:23 pm to WarEagleTwentyFour
Maybe they're trying to go soft on purpose so no one brings up USCw.
Posted on 6/10/09 at 7:26 pm to neutrino
So Alabama won't be getting lucky number 800 against Virginia Tech?
Posted on 6/10/09 at 7:27 pm to WarEagleTwentyFour
quote:
So basically this was all to do bout nothing.
Do any AU fans or I guess just sec fans think this is Fair?
Also was this within the 5 year period?Something tells me no or there would've been loss of schollys and a sanction or 2.
I am numb to the subject,but I don't want to hear about buying players and I seriously doubt bama or satan has to do this
nothing has been said yet officially! for real people... this is all internet mumbo-jumbo.
and as far as what your quote says about you... you DO realize that this makes you look like the only thing that you think that can REALLY help your team's future against your rival is if the zebras intercede and impede our progress?
*edit* it's kinda like hoping that your team only wins because a ref throws a flag
This post was edited on 6/10/09 at 7:29 pm
Posted on 6/10/09 at 7:31 pm to WarEagleTwentyFour
quote:
Also was this within the 5 year period?Something tells me no or there would've been loss of schollys and a sanction or 2.
It happened under the repeat offender rule so that was the big scare that the NCAA would hit them with LOIC due to the size of this.
Saban is known to push the envelope in recruiting and has crossed it at times, it has gotten rules named after him the most well known is the bump rule.
The 3 years probation is a point of concern, Bama has had issues in the past 20 years keeping its rabid fans from helping the program out. If they can keep them inline then it isn't much to worry about.
Page 2 of 4
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News