Started By
Message

re: NCAA Rules Committee Proposes to Eliminate HUNH

Posted on 2/12/14 at 9:37 pm to
Posted by rocksteady
Member since Sep 2013
2323 posts
Posted on 2/12/14 at 9:37 pm to
"trying" to play defense is your issue. I love how you use the word "compete" when Alabama has the most talented team in the country.. how much more help to do you need man? Have you seen an LSU game vs a&m, oregon, or auburn? They seemingly have little trouble shutting down the HUNH.

anyway, I don't know why I'm even talking to you. You're easily 14 years old or retarded.
Posted by sdmlsu1
up n dis bish
Member since Nov 2007
701 posts
Posted on 2/12/14 at 9:38 pm to
Total BS, no change needed.
Posted by sarc
Member since Mar 2011
9997 posts
Posted on 2/12/14 at 9:39 pm to
Bad arguments for the rule change:
- HUNH is a gimmick O
- HUNH O is for pussies
- HUNH is just too fast
- D should be allowed time to get set

Unsupported argument:
- Player safety

Only argument I find somewhat compelling:
- since the O can sub regardless of whether or not the D needs/wants to sub, the D should be afforded the same capability

Posted by rangers911
Member since Jun 2009
5159 posts
Posted on 2/12/14 at 9:39 pm to
quote:

The only logic flying at me is that we should just do away with even trying to play defense, because some teams can't compete with the teams that do want to play defense. Hell, we should just go to arena rules football at by the logic of some on this board.


Dear god are you trying to be dense. This would shift the power of the game back to defense on a staggering level. It would cripple a lot of offenses save for the old out dated power running games that everyone has abandoned save for a few college teams. The NFL doesn't even run that style of offense anymore.

By allowing this time to prevent the offense you have the offense waiting before snap giving away a basic formation giving the defense time to call in a specific play and personnel package just for the view the offense is giving it.

Hate to break it to you but offenses are designed to attack, that's why they are called offense. The defense can still play and get set in time, if a defense isn't getting set vs an offense they are out of shape or poorly coached or both. There is no reason for that to happen. keep in mind a ref has to get the ball set it and get out of the way before its snapped. Amazing Auburn and several other teams figured out how to sub against very fast paced offenses but yet other coaches have the urge to complain because that style of offense puts up more points on them than they'd like.

I really wished Saban would have gone to the Big-12 and face spread teams that he has no clue how to defend.
Posted by HailToTheChiz
Back in Auburn
Member since Aug 2010
53473 posts
Posted on 2/12/14 at 9:39 pm to
Bamatab killed the thread
Posted by GreyReb
Member since Jun 2010
4478 posts
Posted on 2/12/14 at 9:47 pm to
Saban just needs to hire Chavis. Chavis doesn't seem to have trouble with HUNH.

The one thing Saban can't control he is trying to make a movement to be able to control. That guy is a control freak.

Saban, give us some of your 100 5 stars and we will slow down the game like you do. Otherwise, we got to try something, or else we might as well not even play the game.
Posted by sarc
Member since Mar 2011
9997 posts
Posted on 2/12/14 at 9:51 pm to
You realize Saban isn't on the rules committee, right? If he has the power to control rulemaking, why did he allow 2 rules to be passed to curtail his recruiting acumen?
Posted by rangers911
Member since Jun 2009
5159 posts
Posted on 2/12/14 at 9:51 pm to
quote:

Saban just needs to hire Chavis. Chavis doesn't seem to have trouble with HUNH.

The one thing Saban can't control he is trying to make a movement to be able to control. That guy is a control freak.

Saban, give us some of your 100 5 stars and we will slow down the game like you do. Otherwise, we got to try something, or else we might as well not even play the game.


Different styles of defense. LSU has a defense that's generally aimed at stopping spread teams. The defense is aimed at large guys up front on the LOS with slightly smaller faster guys at the LB position that can tackle in space. UA's defense is the more traditional defense that is designed to shut down a running game and get pressure from blitzing and an interior DL push. That's been their problem the last few years in that the DL hasn't gotten pressure and the secondary has been exposed
Posted by rangers911
Member since Jun 2009
5159 posts
Posted on 2/12/14 at 9:53 pm to
quote:

You realize Saban isn't on the rules committee, right? If he has the power to control rulemaking, why did he allow 2 rules to be passed to curtail his recruiting acumen?


He's catching heat because he's one of the leading proponents to limit HUNH offenses. The reason for this is they are directly built to counter his style of defense. Bret at Ark is another very vocal coach about this as well, out side of those two you don't hear many complain about HUNH.
Posted by JuiceTerry
Roond the Scheme
Member since Apr 2013
40868 posts
Posted on 2/12/14 at 9:53 pm to
quote:

Saban
quote:

Saban
quote:

Saban,
quote:

Saban
Posted by sarc
Member since Mar 2011
9997 posts
Posted on 2/12/14 at 9:58 pm to
quote:

He's catching heat because he's one of the leading proponents to limit HUNH offenses. The reason for this is they are directly built to counter his style of defense. Bret at Ark is another very vocal coach about this as well, out side of those two you don't hear many complain about HUNH.


I don't disagree with any of that but people are acting like Saban is directly responsible for this proposal. How much influence do you think he has on the members or the rules committee?
Posted by rocksteady
Member since Sep 2013
2323 posts
Posted on 2/12/14 at 9:59 pm to
juice terry. im soooo surprised that's all you see in the conversation
Posted by GreyReb
Member since Jun 2010
4478 posts
Posted on 2/12/14 at 10:00 pm to
Coaches Quotes:

“First off, [I] doubt it will pass,” Washington State coach Mike Leach said. “Second, it’s ridiculous. All this tinkering is ridiculous. I think it deteriorates the game. It’s always been a game of creativity and strategy. So anytime someone doesn’t want to go back to the drawing board or re-work their solutions to problems, then what they do is to beg for a rule. I think it’s disgusting.”

Ole Miss coach Hugh Freeze, whose team also runs an uptempo offense, wants to know if there is actual proof that uptempo offenses cause more injuries to players.

"Is there documented medical evidence that supports this rule change that tempo offenses are putting players at a higher degree of risk than others? If there is then show it to us," Freeze told ESPN.com Wednesday night. "Where is it? They're going to have to show us some evidence. If there's not any evidence, then they should table it.

"You can do it the last two minutes of the game. Isn't that when you should be most fatigued?"

Added Leach: “That’s really insulting that they are hiding behind player safety just because somebody wants an advantage. That’s crazy.”

“All you’re trying to do is get lined up [on defense],” Saban told ESPN.com in September. “You can’t play specialty third-down stuff. You can’t hardly scheme anything. The most important thing is to get the call so the guys can get lined up, and it’s got to be a simple call. The offense kind of knows what you’re doing."

But Leach contends it’s unfair to handcuff offenses because defenses can’t keep up with the pace.

“My suggestion is rather than spending a bunch of time coming up with a bunch of really stupid rules, spend that time coaching harder,” Leach said. “Worry about your own team and try to make your product better rather than trying to change the game so you don’t have to do anything.”

Freeze also believes that allowing defenses to rotate players in and out more frequently under this rule will put offensive linemen who are a part of uptempo offenses at more risk for injury because they will potentially face fresher defensive linemen every few snaps.

"If anything, you may be making it more dangerous for the offensive line because they're going to face 12 five-star defensive linemen from Alabama rotating every three plays," he said.

To Freeze, taking away the opportunity to snap the ball as fast as possible is taking away a major fundamental advantage that any offense can use against opposing defenses, which are allowed as much movement as possible before a play is even run.

"Since the start of football, defenses can line up wherever they want to," Freeze said. "They can move around as much as they want to before the snap. … They can do whatever they want to do, that's fine. I coach defense, too, that's great. The one thing that has always been offenses' deal is snapping the ball. That's the only thing we have."

Saban sounds like a whiny arse bitch and Leach and Freeze make actual sense.
This post was edited on 2/12/14 at 10:04 pm
Posted by chattabama
12essee
Member since Jun 2012
19315 posts
Posted on 2/12/14 at 10:00 pm to
quote:

Saban just needs to hire Chavis. Chavis doesn't seem to have trouble with HUNH.


quote:

Ole Miss fan


You do realize that Saban/Smart's defense shut down OM last year, right? And Chavis' defense gave up how many points?
Posted by GreyReb
Member since Jun 2010
4478 posts
Posted on 2/12/14 at 10:03 pm to
I also realized Saban/Smart got smoked by Auburn and Oklahoma. Saban has always had trouble with the Spread. Hence the rule change.
Posted by RockyMtnTigerWDE
War Damn Eagle Dad!
Member since Oct 2010
108002 posts
Posted on 2/12/14 at 10:06 pm to
quote:

Only argument I find somewhat compelling:
- since the O can sub regardless of whether or not the D needs/wants to sub, the D should be afforded the same capability


Someone can correct me if I am wrong, but I believe there is a rule already in place that if a offense substitutes the defense is given the ability to do the same. In fact I believe the ref stands over the ball at this time to allow it. I am not confident of that, or I may have it partially correct.
Posted by sarc
Member since Mar 2011
9997 posts
Posted on 2/12/14 at 10:06 pm to
So is Saban bribing the members of the rules committee or what?
Posted by Bamatab
Member since Jan 2013
16225 posts
Posted on 2/12/14 at 10:07 pm to
quote:

Saban has always had trouble with the Spread. Hence the rule change.

Yeah...that's right. Saban has the power to make rule changes.
Posted by GreyReb
Member since Jun 2010
4478 posts
Posted on 2/12/14 at 10:08 pm to
quote:

So is Saban bribing the members of the rules committee or what?


No, but his constant use of his hands and rambling effect hypnotized the committee to make his changes needed.
Posted by sarc
Member since Mar 2011
9997 posts
Posted on 2/12/14 at 10:09 pm to
quote:

Someone can correct me if I am wrong, but I believe there is a rule already in place that if a offense substitutes the defense is given the ability to do the same. In fact I believe the ref stands over the ball at this time to allow it. I am not confident of that, or I may have it partially correct.


There is but that's not what I'm saying. If the O is allowed to sub regardless of whether or not the D is subbing, should the D be able to sub regardless of whether or not the O is subbing. I realize in theory the D has this capability but in practice they do not.
Jump to page
Page First 18 19 20 21 22 ... 44
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 20 of 44Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter