Started By
Message
re: NCAA: Cam Newton Is Eligible to Compete
Posted on 12/1/10 at 12:52 pm to LSU NO Tigah
Posted on 12/1/10 at 12:52 pm to LSU NO Tigah
quote:
LSU ATL TIGAH
Regardless of what the NCAA says today, if anyone actually believes that the Newtons weren't paid by Auburn or Auburn boosters, they are incredibly naive. This is Auburn after all, one of the dirtiest programs in the history of college football.
Show your work
1
Posted on 12/1/10 at 12:52 pm to Tiger n Miami AU83
quote:
That one that was quoted was from an institution standpoint where an institution engaged in trying to buy a player.
Isn't a booster a representative of the institution?
quote:
"If at any time before or after matriculation in a member institution a student-athlete or any member of his/her family receives or agrees to receive, directly or indirectly, any aid or assistance beyond or in addition to that permitted by the Bylaws of this Conference (except such aid or assistance as such student-athlete may receive from those persons on whom the student is naturally or legally dependent for support), such student- athlete shall be ineligible for competition in any intercollegiate sport within the Conference for the remainder of his/her college career"
Posted on 12/1/10 at 12:52 pm to Slevin
quote:At least we now have an admission that the Newtons are dirty, that's enough of an asterisk right there to tarnish anything. Cam is a cheater as well. Nothing honest about this family. Figures that Mr. Newton is a preacher.
Hypothetically gives me 3 years of bragging time
Posted on 12/1/10 at 12:52 pm to MaroonNation
quote:
The rule states once one institution is solicited, he is ineligable at all institutions in the SEC, regardless of him soliciting or not. He would have been just as ineligable at Vandy as he is at AU.
You are 100% wrong, but I am not explaining it again.
Posted on 12/1/10 at 12:52 pm to etm512
quote:the fine print makes that void if you're in the middle of a heisman campaign or a BCS title run.
Doesn't the SEC have a rule that the player would be ineligible at all schools within the conference though?
Posted on 12/1/10 at 12:53 pm to LSU NO Tigah
quote:
Regardless of what the NCAA says today, if anyone actually believes that the Newtons weren't paid by Auburn or Auburn boosters, they are incredibly naive. This is Auburn after all, one of the dirtiest programs in the history of college football.
Do you have links to this, or do you just know?
Posted on 12/1/10 at 12:53 pm to TheGame33
quote:What's that supposed to mean?
Show your work
Posted on 12/1/10 at 12:54 pm to etm512
quote:
receives or agrees to receive
Key words.
Posted on 12/1/10 at 12:54 pm to Tiger n Miami AU83
quote:
And it is insanely stupid to keep explaining shite to retards on this board that can't interpret a rule to save their life.
If I was an Aub, I would celebrate this news too. Because as of TODAY, AU & the NCAA know that Cecil whored out his son, and they followed procedures to have Cam "reinstated" to play ball.
As of TODAY - that's all AU fans need to roll Toomers again this afternoon.
Don't waste a minute of your time thinking about AU's future.
LIVE IN THE MOMENT! SEIZE THE DAY!
Posted on 12/1/10 at 12:55 pm to LSU NO Tigah
quote:
What's that supposed to mean?
It means offer up some proof that Cam or his father took money.
Posted on 12/1/10 at 12:55 pm to LSU NO Tigah
quote:
What's that supposed to mean?
He wants you to mention Eric Ramsey.
Posted on 12/1/10 at 12:55 pm to michaeldwde
This is strictly the reinstatement side of the investigation. The enforcement side is completely different and is not finished.
Posted on 12/1/10 at 12:56 pm to arty
quote:
arty
Try again, learn to read, etc.
I am tired of handholding and explaining to dumbasses on this board that cannot read and interpret rules correctly.
Posted on 12/1/10 at 12:56 pm to CapstoneGrad04
The textbook 5 were reinstated before the NCAA enforcement comm ruled and UA vacated those wins
Posted on 12/1/10 at 12:56 pm to michaeldwde
quote:I believe it will come out in time. If you want to find out why Auburn is considered a dirty program just do a google search of the dirtiest college football programs. Auburn will consistently come up in those articles. There's no need to be defensive; Auburn has a history of cheating that is well documented. I think it will be found to have once again cheated in this situation when all is said and done.
Do you have links to this, or do you just know?
Posted on 12/1/10 at 12:57 pm to rbWarEagle
I'm just saying you look really ignorant and looked like you were dismissing the whole thing all together.
This is very far from being over. I wouldn't be laughing too much or you may end up looking really foolish.
This is very far from being over. I wouldn't be laughing too much or you may end up looking really foolish.
Posted on 12/1/10 at 12:57 pm to LSU NO Tigah
quote:
quote:
Show your work
What's that supposed to mean?
He wants a copy of the "TAPES".
Posted on 12/1/10 at 12:58 pm to LSU NO Tigah
quote:
What's that supposed to mean?
He wants you to mention Eric Ramsey.
Posted on 12/1/10 at 12:58 pm to Tiger n Miami AU83
quote:
quote:
The rule states once one institution is solicited, he is ineligable at all institutions in the SEC, regardless of him soliciting or not. He would have been just as ineligable at Vandy as he is at AU.
You are 100% wrong, but I am not explaining it again.
quote:
14.01.3.2 If at any time before or after matriculation in a member institution a student-athlete or any member of his/her family receives or agrees to receive, directly or indirectly, any aid or assistance beyond or in addition to that permitted by the Bylaws of this Conference (except such aid or assistance as such student-athlete may receive from those persons on whom the student is naturally or legally dependent for support), such student- athlete shall be ineligible for competition in any intercollegiate sport within the Conference for the remainder of his/her college career.
Posted on 12/1/10 at 12:58 pm to CapstoneGrad04
quote:
The textbook 5 were reinstated before the NCAA enforcement comm ruled and UA vacated those wins
Didn't have anything to do with the fact is was SHOWN they RECEIVED improper benefits did it?
Page 9 of 20
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News