Started By
Message
re: NCAA: Cam Newton Is Eligible to Compete
Posted on 12/1/10 at 1:49 pm to rbWarEagle
Posted on 12/1/10 at 1:49 pm to rbWarEagle
Why would I have said that four times? 
Posted on 12/1/10 at 1:52 pm to bayourant
Cam was ineligible for about 24 hours. I doubt this is the end of this.
Posted on 12/1/10 at 1:53 pm to OneMoreTime
Dads of the world unite. No harm in asking for money. Go for it!
Posted on 12/1/10 at 1:55 pm to XUglow
Just became a NFL fan again. If I am gonna watch people get paid to play, it might as well be both teams 
Posted on 12/1/10 at 1:56 pm to rbWarEagle
I like the SEC rant today
Posted on 12/1/10 at 2:02 pm to OneMoreTime
So wait... LSU doesn't get to play in the SECCG then?!?
Dangit!!!

Dangit!!!
Posted on 12/1/10 at 2:03 pm to WDE24
quote:
Maybe you are missing the part about it still being illegal to pay the athletes? This makes no since. Now everyone can shop their kids for the highest price as long as they don't take money. The parent who asks for the most and is rejected wins.
Is it still illegal to pay thier parents?? I'm not joking, serious question. If the "I didnt know" defense is now legitimate, then couldnt it successfully be applied even if money had exchanged hands?????
Posted on 12/1/10 at 2:08 pm to McChowder
I love it....these posts are so much entertainment...I have truly been glued to this website for the last couple of weeks.
Now...Auburn, don't mess up this weekend. That would be kinda goofy.
Now...Auburn, don't mess up this weekend. That would be kinda goofy.
Posted on 12/1/10 at 2:10 pm to McChowder
Just a thing to remember-
In the textbook case, the University found out about the violations and declared the players involved ineligible. The players sat 4 games and then were reinstated for the Auburn game and the bowl game.
The investigation continued. The players were then declared ineligible and all wins the players played in prior to their suspension were ordered vacated by the NCAA.
This thing could go so many ways and because of the capriciousness of the NCAA, I continue to hold the position that neither pro-Cam nor anti-Cam sides have reason to celebrate.
In the textbook case, the University found out about the violations and declared the players involved ineligible. The players sat 4 games and then were reinstated for the Auburn game and the bowl game.
The investigation continued. The players were then declared ineligible and all wins the players played in prior to their suspension were ordered vacated by the NCAA.
This thing could go so many ways and because of the capriciousness of the NCAA, I continue to hold the position that neither pro-Cam nor anti-Cam sides have reason to celebrate.
Posted on 12/1/10 at 2:10 pm to csb101
Scott Van Pelt show is good. right now on ESPN 2.
Posted on 12/1/10 at 2:10 pm to McChowder
quote:No, because the school or booster would still be violating the rules.
Is it still illegal to pay thier parents?? I'm not joking, serious question. If the "I didnt know" defense is now legitimate, then couldnt it successfully be applied even if money had exchanged hands?????
Posted on 12/1/10 at 2:10 pm to BamaChick
There's lotsa deleting goin on in this thread. It's shrank by 5 posts in the last 3 minutes. 
Posted on 12/1/10 at 2:12 pm to Alahunter
quote:
There's lotsa deleting goin on in this thread. It's shrank by 5 posts in the last 3 minutes.
That was my fault
The vandy fan and I got into a little tif (all in good fun) but apparently it went too far.
P.S. Sorry Rummy
Won't happen again
Posted on 12/1/10 at 2:16 pm to rbWarEagle
No tiff. But in all seriousness, you don't really believe this is the end of it do you?
Posted on 12/1/10 at 2:18 pm to Bronwyn
No. That's why our "tiff" started, as a matter of fact. I made fun of you for not being able to read because I said that I don't believe we are out of the woods
. It's all gravy, though. 
Posted on 12/1/10 at 2:18 pm to rbWarEagle
Good call on the ESPN Radio reminder...Scott Van Pelt that is...
Popular
Back to top



1








