Started By
Message
re: My Pick To Win it All This Year Is....
Posted on 7/24/13 at 8:00 am to PrivatePublic
Posted on 7/24/13 at 8:00 am to PrivatePublic
The SECCG???? Can you give me a better sample size?
1
Posted on 7/24/13 at 8:02 am to KaiserSoze99
quote:
The SECCG???? Can you give me a better sample size?
Shut the frick up. You know he just nullified your flame. If you want extensive statistics, look them up yourself.
Posted on 7/24/13 at 8:04 am to Teague
Posted on 7/24/13 at 8:06 am to 3legr
finally....somebody gets it
Posted on 7/24/13 at 8:10 am to HuggieBear
nm
This post was edited on 7/24/13 at 8:14 am
Posted on 7/24/13 at 8:10 am to SpartyGator
quote:
Florida says hi
tell Florida i said hi back
Posted on 7/24/13 at 8:11 am to Choctaw
I think he means new to the conference
Posted on 7/24/13 at 8:13 am to Choctaw
quote:
tell Florida i said hi back
I'll gladly do that
TBH, I predicted FLA would drop that one (As well as USC), but I think that's going to be a great game. I just love to troll ya'll (for now
). I do want to beat up on UGA more, though.This post was edited on 7/24/13 at 8:15 am
Posted on 7/24/13 at 8:13 am to DMagic
quote:
I think he means new to the conference
yeah...i figured that after a couple of minutes. im still half asleep
Posted on 7/24/13 at 8:15 am to KaiserSoze99
quote:
Okay.
College Football Rematches Typically Produce a Different Winner.
Now, you shut the frick up.
From your link:
quote:
Of the 41 rematches that I found in college football history, the loser of Game 1 is 21-20 in Game 2.
Whew, what an advantage!
Kindly keep shutting the frick up.
Posted on 7/24/13 at 8:18 am to Teague
5-1 v. 21-20
You basically have a 50-50 shot at winning the rematch. You think that's insignificant?
Kindly keep shutting the frick up yourself.
You basically have a 50-50 shot at winning the rematch. You think that's insignificant?
Kindly keep shutting the frick up yourself.
Posted on 7/24/13 at 8:22 am to KaiserSoze99
quote:
You think that's insignificant?
OH! You meant, "insignificant"! You said "hard as hell" so I thought that's what you meant.
You're right, just because you beat a team once, it doesn't mean you'll automatically do it again, if that's what you meant. However, if you meant that the odds are somehow greatly switched in favor of the team that lost the first game, then ........ shut the frick up some more.
Posted on 7/24/13 at 8:27 am to Teague
Okay. I will concede that "hard as hell" was hyperbole. But a rematch being a coin flip does tend to prove that the original winner is at a statistical disadvantage to the point where a rematch is unfair on several levels. I will leave it at that.
Posted on 7/24/13 at 8:34 am to KaiserSoze99
quote:
Okay. I will concede that "hard as hell" was hyperbole. But a rematch being a coin flip does tend to prove that the original winner is at a statistical disadvantage to the point where a rematch is unfair on several levels. I will leave it at that.
Ok, my hate is gone. You can stop shutting the frick up.
But, why do you think those 44 teams got rematches? The vast majority were in conference championships or bowl games, I'm sure. Which means ....... you guessed it ........ they were pretty evenly matched in the first place. And look, the results come out almost exactly 50/50.
Posted on 7/24/13 at 8:35 am to Rickdaddy4188
quote:
Our schedule is just too hard to go undefeated. As of right now we play 4 teams in the 15 and 5 in the top 25.
in 2011 we played 4 in the top 5 or some shite
Posted on 7/24/13 at 8:57 am to Choctaw
quote:
in 2011 we played 4 in the top 5 or some shite
Yes but 2 of those were OOC and spaced around weaker teams. While LSU's 2011 regular season was amazing, there were easy matchups between the big games.
-Oregon to start the year
-Miss State before WVU
-Kentucky before Florida
-Open date before Bama
-Ole Miss before Arkansas
This 2013 schedule has Auburn, @UGA, @Miss State, Florida, @Ole Miss in consecutive weeks. No way LSU gets through that stretch undefeated.
Posted on 7/24/13 at 9:25 am to skullhawk
quote:
-Miss State before WVU
Auburn before UGA (and State was ranked when we played them)
quote:
-Kentucky before Florida
Miss State before Florida
then Ole Miss who could be tough or could be 2-4
basically 2 weeks off before bama
bye week before A&M
it's tough but not impossible
This post was edited on 7/24/13 at 9:26 am
Posted on 7/24/13 at 9:29 am to Choctaw
quote:
then Ole Miss who could be tough or could be 2-4
Ole Miss has a very difficult first 7 games (save S.E. Missouri). I know we were fortunate to win last year. I'm expecting a pretty tough game.
Posted on 7/24/13 at 9:33 am to dbt_Geaux_Tigers_196
LSU could have to beat 6(!!) top 10 teams and another couple top 25 to go undefeated next season. Bama/A&M/UF/UGA/SECCG(USC?)/NC then you got TCU/Ole Miss. 8/14 games against top 25 and 6/14 against possible top 10 teams.
Good Luck
Good Luck
This post was edited on 7/24/13 at 9:34 am
Posted on 7/24/13 at 9:37 am to MMB5DAP
quote:
Good Luck
We'll need it.
Hard to speak for a whole fanbase but I'd venture most LSU fans simply want to see an efficient O, commensurate with talent, that should finish in the 30's or better in Total Offense. If we can do that, I'll be excited. If we win, we win...if we lose, we lose. But just, for the Love of Gawd, be competent.
Page 4 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News