Started By
Message
re: Most infamous games in SEC since 1992
Posted on 4/29/14 at 6:59 pm to mjw60532
Posted on 4/29/14 at 6:59 pm to mjw60532
quote:
The waved PI call was terrible. Doucet clearly could have made a play on the ball if his arm wasn't grabbed. Doesn't matter if the ball was tipped if the interference occurred beforehand.
There was no way in hell he could have made a play on the ball. Impossible.
Might want to brush up on the rule book
2
Posted on 4/29/14 at 7:00 pm to NYCAuburn
quote:I'd love to see the links. Because I see PI called all the time where the ball is batted down after the receiver is raped and they don't wave off the foul.
Well considering multiple refs have made the same call in different games, goes along with the rule book, and hell even the ex head of nfl officiating stated that type of call was a good call, I'm not sure what's so hard to grasp.
Posted on 4/29/14 at 7:01 pm to JuiceTerry
The ball was uncatchable. Same thing happened in the nfl this year, Carolina game I believe.
According to the rule book, no pi.
According to the rule book, no pi.
Posted on 4/29/14 at 7:03 pm to JuiceTerry
quote:it happens all the time. If this was the rule it would be so simple to be a cornerback. Knock the shite out of the receiver/trip him/give him a nut punch to where he falls down, and then just make sure you touch the ball after and you are good to go
Because I see PI called all the time where the ball is batted down after the receiver is raped and they don't wave off the foul.
Posted on 4/29/14 at 7:04 pm to NYCAuburn
quote:
The ball was uncatchable.
:lol: Posted on 4/29/14 at 7:04 pm to lsupride87
quote:
it happens all the time. If this was the rule it would be so simple to be a cornerback. Knock the shite out of the receiver/trip him/give him a nut punch to where he falls down, and then just make sure you touch the ball after and you are good to go
Except you would need a couple of other scenarios to come into play in order for it to be legal.
Posted on 4/29/14 at 7:04 pm to NYCAuburn
quote:
The ball was uncatchable.
Posted on 4/29/14 at 7:04 pm to NYCAuburn
quote:
There was no way in hell he could have made a play on the ball while being held. Impossible.
I agree.
Posted on 4/29/14 at 7:04 pm to JuiceTerry
quote:
after the receiver is raped
Pretty sure if this happens, they don't call PI. They haul the offender off to jail.
Posted on 4/29/14 at 7:04 pm to lsupride87
Regardless, the worst game I have ever seen is the UF/Arky game in 2009. Impossible to say that game wasnt fixed. Impossible
Posted on 4/29/14 at 7:05 pm to FourThreeForty
Ole Miss-31
National Champions-30
National Champions-30
Posted on 4/29/14 at 7:05 pm to lsupride87
quote:
lsupride87
I am guessing laughter because you can't grasp the truth.
If you think the ball was catchable, I have some great stocks to show you.
Posted on 4/29/14 at 7:06 pm to RollTide1987
quote:
RollTide1987
Explain how he could have caught it? I mean with physics and all, it's impossible, but guessing he a teleported or something.
Posted on 4/29/14 at 7:07 pm to NYCAuburn
quote:Why? If I knock down the receiver in the route when the ball is first in the air, and my teammate catches or touches it ten yards from where the receiver is laying on the ground, clearly it was uncatachable for the receiver ten yards away. Seems like defense should be easy
Except you would need a couple of other scenarios to come into play in order for it to be legal.
Posted on 4/29/14 at 7:08 pm to NYCAuburn
quote:f I knock down the receiver in the route when the ball is first in the air, and my teammate catches or touches it ten yards from where the receiver is laying on the ground, clearly it was uncatachable for the receiver ten yards away. Seems like defense should be easy
[quote]Explain how he could have caught it? I mean with physics and all, it's impossible, but guessing he a teleported or something.[/quoteI
ETA: BOOM
This post was edited on 4/29/14 at 7:10 pm
Posted on 4/29/14 at 7:10 pm to lsupride87
Ark v UF 2009 were we whipped that arse. It should have been by more but whatever.
Posted on 4/29/14 at 7:11 pm to lsupride87
quote:
Why? If I knock down the receiver in the route when the ball is first in the air, and my teammate catches or touches it ten yards from where the receiver is laying on the ground, clearly it was uncatachable for the receiver ten yards away. Seems like defense should be easy
Nope but nice try.
It's funny we had this thread a while back on the msb, same retorts from y'all, then someone suggest, why don't we send this to mike pereira, then low an behold same scenario happens, mike comments that play is called correctly, then silence.
quote:
ETA: BOOM
No.
This post was edited on 4/29/14 at 7:12 pm
Posted on 4/29/14 at 7:12 pm to NYCAuburn
Tennessee vs Arkansas 1998
Posted on 4/29/14 at 7:12 pm to NYCAuburn
quote:What is the difference from my scenario? Interference occurred, but the ball is clearly uncatchable?
Nope but nice try.
Posted on 4/29/14 at 7:14 pm to lsupride87
The players ability to make a play on the ball.
Page 10 of 23
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News