Started By
Message
re: Mizzou and A&M both 1-10 in SEC v. teams with winning conference records
Posted on 4/4/15 at 8:47 pm to SoberAg
Posted on 4/4/15 at 8:47 pm to SoberAg
quote:
You're bad at this.
You are talking to me.
You are making no sense.
And yet you responded.
Edit: I didn't quote you either. Reading comprehension ftl.
This post was edited on 4/4/15 at 8:48 pm
1
Posted on 4/4/15 at 8:47 pm to SoberAg
quote:
So, how did your running game fare against a team WITH a defense... Like, idk arkie?
Or Ole Miss?
This is irrelevant anyway. Your defense still won't be any good next year.
Posted on 4/4/15 at 8:49 pm to Korin
quote:
And yet you responded.
How does a gator even shut his jaws with that much LSU dick in between them?
Posted on 4/4/15 at 8:50 pm to craigbiggio
quote:
This is irrelevant anyway.
HAHAHA but series wins is MORE relevant?
bro... LMFAO
Posted on 4/4/15 at 8:52 pm to SoberAg
When did I say series record was relevant to next year?
Posted on 4/4/15 at 8:55 pm to craigbiggio
quote:
Head to head is irrelevant?
That's you amigo, but if you are done talking football and 'irrelevant' posts that influence NEXT YEARS outcome, feel free to leave the thread lol
Posted on 4/4/15 at 8:57 pm to SoberAg
Lol take a look at the post I responded to. Context clues are helpful.
Posted on 4/4/15 at 8:59 pm to craigbiggio
quote:
Lol take a look at the post I responded to. Context clues are helpful.
English burn, nice.
Now address/counter why I think A&M will beat LSU next year.
I'm all ears.
Posted on 4/4/15 at 9:01 pm to SoberAg
That was more of a reading comprehension burn.
And I already gave my reason. Don't think your defense is going to be good enough in year 1 under Chavis to stop us.
And I already gave my reason. Don't think your defense is going to be good enough in year 1 under Chavis to stop us.
Posted on 4/4/15 at 9:03 pm to craigbiggio
quote:
That was more of a reading comprehension burn.
2-2 lol
quote:
Don't think your defense is going to be good enough in year 1 under Chavis to stop us.
And I don't think your offense will have a pulse and your defense will be worse.
Posted on 4/4/15 at 9:04 pm to SoberAg
Agree to disagree friend.
Go stros
Go stros
Posted on 4/4/15 at 9:07 pm to craigbiggio
quote:
Agree to disagree friend.
Dude, you are GOAT LSU poster.
Go 'stros.
Posted on 4/5/15 at 12:31 am to hogfan870
I wanted to upvote this thread, but realized I already have.
darn
darn
Posted on 4/5/15 at 1:21 am to SoberAg
(no message)
This post was edited on 10/20/21 at 1:33 pm
Posted on 4/5/15 at 1:23 am to SoberAg
(no message)
This post was edited on 10/20/21 at 1:33 pm
Posted on 4/5/15 at 1:33 am to SoberAg
dude. you said aTm is lsus daddy. then, u get put in your place with legit and undeniable facts as to why you arent, like a fricking dna test no doubt...then you change the subject and babble on making a fool of yourself. maury says "aTm...you are NOT the father". jackass
This post was edited on 4/5/15 at 2:08 am
Posted on 4/5/15 at 1:56 am to hogfan870
Well, Mizzou is 3-0 against teams with .500 conference records....and if it hadn't been for Mizzou winning those three games, each of those teams *would* have been "teams with winning records." So that totally counts as 3 more wins on Mizzou's part.
Also, tacking on our losses in two SEC championship games as you did seems a bit excessive. I get that you're trying to build the case that we and Aggy suck, but seeing as the framework of whether or not a team finished with a "winning conference record" is pretty universally accepted to mean their regular season record, your approach is pretty slanted.
TL,DR: tFlagship sux.
Also, tacking on our losses in two SEC championship games as you did seems a bit excessive. I get that you're trying to build the case that we and Aggy suck, but seeing as the framework of whether or not a team finished with a "winning conference record" is pretty universally accepted to mean their regular season record, your approach is pretty slanted.
TL,DR: tFlagship sux.
Posted on 4/5/15 at 6:30 am to hogfan870
SEC team records against SEC teams with a winning conference record:
LINK
Of course, that's a really lame way to look at things, considering that if you win, you might knock your opponent from the "winning record" category. It's better to exclude the head to head game when looking at these things:
LINK
LINK
Of course, that's a really lame way to look at things, considering that if you win, you might knock your opponent from the "winning record" category. It's better to exclude the head to head game when looking at these things:
LINK
This post was edited on 4/8/15 at 9:42 am
Posted on 4/5/15 at 6:55 am to Mizzou Fan in Da ATX
Yep, conference championship games don't count, it's all about getting there.....
Posted on 4/7/15 at 11:07 pm to lefty08
I <3 this thread
Page 8 of 9
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News