Started By
Message
re: Mike Slive wants you to know that Gene Chizik is right
Posted on 7/20/11 at 9:55 am to Thracken13
Posted on 7/20/11 at 9:55 am to Thracken13
Mother of God, you people just can't read, even when it's spoon fed to you in three sentences with the important parts highlighted.
Perhaps you missed the very next sentence.
No one has said the investigation was over, just that Auburn is not at the center of it, and as of right now, Auburn has not been even accused of any alleged wrongdoing by the NCAA.
Are you even paying attention?
It should be obvious what he's talking about, but since you refuse to acknowledge the obvious, Chizik was slammed by the media for basically telling Loch to hurry the frick up with the investigations already. Slive is echoing the exact same sentiment. He even goes on to specify the Cam Newton and Tennessee investigations specifically. By the way, Dooley was the one that brought this up to Loch, Chizik just seconded his inquiry, yet somehow (I know how, Pete Thamel has priapism for Auburn) it became about Chizik.
I forgot Slive was "Auburn".
So in your warped minds, Slive is going to straight up lie and say one of his teams has not received a LOI? Why would that be necessary, even if he was trying to save face, but in the same sentence mention that Tennessee is under investigation. Either way, Slive is not the Auburn Athletic department, so your comments make zero sense.
quote:
I thought that was over? You guys told me it was over!!!
Perhaps you missed the very next sentence.
quote:
Auburn has not received an official letter of inquiry.
No one has said the investigation was over, just that Auburn is not at the center of it, and as of right now, Auburn has not been even accused of any alleged wrongdoing by the NCAA.
quote:
Not even close to what he said.
Are you even paying attention?
quote:
Slive says he and other college and league administrators "feel like change is important," including having investigations "handled in a timely way."
It should be obvious what he's talking about, but since you refuse to acknowledge the obvious, Chizik was slammed by the media for basically telling Loch to hurry the frick up with the investigations already. Slive is echoing the exact same sentiment. He even goes on to specify the Cam Newton and Tennessee investigations specifically. By the way, Dooley was the one that brought this up to Loch, Chizik just seconded his inquiry, yet somehow (I know how, Pete Thamel has priapism for Auburn) it became about Chizik.
quote:
Fair enough...but if you look at my posts, I am saying that auburn is not going to admit to receiving a LOI because it is not good publicity for them to do so.
Same as Ga Tech did and the same as Alabama did during the textbook investigation.
I really don't think auburn has that much to gain by saying they have a LOI, therefore I don't think they will alert to media to anything.
As far as the FOI request for secondaries, that was in response to a post about what auburn was hiding. I personally don't think that is a big issue. Again, Alabama is still not releasing secondary violations from Saban's 1st year.
I forgot Slive was "Auburn".
So in your warped minds, Slive is going to straight up lie and say one of his teams has not received a LOI? Why would that be necessary, even if he was trying to save face, but in the same sentence mention that Tennessee is under investigation. Either way, Slive is not the Auburn Athletic department, so your comments make zero sense.
Posted on 7/20/11 at 9:56 am to stapuffmarshy
quote:
I thought it was a race between Arky and Aubie on who has the dumbest most ignorant fans
you have helped Aubie pull miles in front of the piggers
LSU already beat both of us.
Posted on 7/20/11 at 10:00 am to Camp Randall
quote:
Correct. This also allows the head in the sand morons to cling to the hope that there is no ongoing investigation. Then they run to messageboards and post crap about it.
It's not a big deal either way IMO.
Whatever you say, major violations LSU.
Posted on 7/20/11 at 10:03 am to joeyb147
Yes , you flame the only school that committed major violations and was praised for how well they handled it. Not only praised, but rewarded scholarships back.
Posted on 7/20/11 at 10:05 am to memphisplaya
quote:
Yes , you flame the only school that committed major violations and was praised for how well they handled it. Not only praised, but rewarded scholarships back.
Please tell me what I posted that wasn't true.
Yes, you are still stalking me. Cool bro. Sorry I called your arse out for posting the same garbage about trees. Get the frick over it.
Posted on 7/20/11 at 10:10 am to joeyb147
Stalking? I have like less than ten reponses to you in my post history. the frick are you talking about
Posted on 7/20/11 at 10:17 am to joeyb147
quote:
Whatever you say, major violations LSU.
Jesus, there are some dimwitted fricks up in this thread. I'm embarrassed to have participated.
Posted on 7/20/11 at 10:25 am to Camp Randall
quote:You have to ignore the poster that you replied to
Jesus, there are some dimwitted fricks up in this thread. I'm embarrassed to have participated.
Posted on 7/20/11 at 10:26 am to NOLA Aub
quote:
I forgot Slive was "Auburn".
So in your warped minds, Slive is going to straight up lie and say one of his teams has not received a LOI? Why would that be necessary, even if he was trying to save face, but in the same sentence mention that Tennessee is under investigation. Either way, Slive is not the Auburn Athletic department, so your comments make zero sense.
Once again....the OP was not quoting Slive when referring to auburn receiving a LOI. It was a media member stating that as a fact...when that media member doesn't know that for a fact.
What is so hard to understand about that? Quit trying to twist my words. I've written it in an earlier post at a 5th grade level? Need I go down to 4K?
Posted on 7/20/11 at 10:34 am to Camp Randall
quote:
Jesus, there are some dimwitted fricks up in this thread. I'm embarrassed to have participated.
Did LSU not commit major violations, dimwitted frick?
quote:
You have to ignore the poster that you replied to
Posted on 7/20/11 at 10:49 am to NOLA Aub
[quote]I forgot Slive was "Auburn".
So in your warped minds, Slive is going to straight up lie and say one of his teams has not received a LOI? Why would that be necessary, even if he was trying to save face, but in the same sentence mention that Tennessee is under investigation. Either way, Slive is not the Auburn Athletic department, so your comments make zero sense.[/quote
No, Slive is going to protect the school that is the face of the conference because it just won the national championship.
So in your warped minds, Slive is going to straight up lie and say one of his teams has not received a LOI? Why would that be necessary, even if he was trying to save face, but in the same sentence mention that Tennessee is under investigation. Either way, Slive is not the Auburn Athletic department, so your comments make zero sense.[/quote
No, Slive is going to protect the school that is the face of the conference because it just won the national championship.
Posted on 7/20/11 at 1:15 pm to memphisplaya
quote:
Yes , you flame the only school that committed major violations and was praised for how well they handled it. Not only praised, but rewarded scholarships back.
My snotty little brother always used to "tell" Mom and Pop all the things he did wrong and they would pat him on the head. I caught hell because I always tried to hide it.
When Mom and Pop closed the door, I always beat the crap out of little bro.
Popular
Back to top

2





