Started By
Message
re: Mateer vs Ole Miss defense
Posted on 10/23/25 at 12:30 pm to CharlotteSooner
Posted on 10/23/25 at 12:30 pm to CharlotteSooner
quote:
You left this part out. I was clearly talking about P4 opponents we've played, obviously not Temple. Keep up.....
I already addressed this in both the post you originally responded to as well as the following one. Keep up......
I even gave the benefit of the doubt in not including the Texas game. He was arse but apparently still playing with an injured thumb for whatever idiotic reason.
And if you look even more into the context of the post you originally responded to....you would notice the post is referring to Mateer. Not sure if you're aware, but he didn't play for Oklahoma last season. So....just hear me out for a bit.....I might not ONLY be talking about Oklahoma.
Hope you're able to keep up.....
Posted on 10/23/25 at 12:37 pm to pankReb
What does Mateer not playing for Oklahoma last year have to do with anything?
Posted on 10/23/25 at 12:39 pm to CharlotteSooner
quote:
What does Mateer not playing for Oklahoma last year have to do with anything?
as I stated......it all goes back to my post you originally commented to. It's a pretty big context clue. Reading it is incredibly fundamental. I suggest you take your own advice and fully read the entire post.
Hell....Even the thread title is a massive clue. Just ask yourself.....does the thread title mention Oklahoma? I know this is difficult for you....but I have faith.
Posted on 10/23/25 at 12:44 pm to pankReb
Your post I commented to has been edited and just yammers about my defense comment which you took out of context to include non P4 teams we've faced, as if I'd talk them up as good defenses in the first place.
Mateer didn't play at Oklahoma last year. True.
This thread is about Mateer vs. Ole Miss. Also true. So what?
Mateer didn't play at Oklahoma last year. True.
This thread is about Mateer vs. Ole Miss. Also true. So what?
Posted on 10/23/25 at 12:48 pm to CharlotteSooner
quote:
Your post I commented to has been edited and just yammers about my defense comment which you took out of context to include non P4 teams we've faced, as if I'd talk them up as good defenses in the first place.
*obnoxious wrong answer buzzer noise*
This is the original post of mine that you commented to...
quote:
I haven’t watched him this year but so many people on this site post as if he’s an elite quarterback and has just been injured for a few games.
Their SOS is pretty bad so is this just a product of going up against awful defenses?
I'm talking about Mateer....you idiot.
Posted on 10/23/25 at 12:53 pm to pankReb
quote:
I'm talking about Mateer....you idiot.
I know that, dipshit.
quote:
Their SOS is pretty bad so is this just a product of going up against awful defenses?
I was responding to this nonsensical statement.......you idiot.
Posted on 10/23/25 at 12:58 pm to CharlotteSooner
quote:
I know that, dipshit.
quote:
Apparently not as you've been under the assumption that I've been talking specifically about Oklahoma as a team.
quote:
I was responding to this nonsensical statement.......you idiot.
It's only nonsensical because you lack common sense. Has he performed at a level against P4 defenses that makes him worthy of being hyped up as much as some are doing.....not really. Where is the hype coming from? Is it the awful defenses that you said he didn't play against before having to specify not talking about the already mentioned P4 teams? Is the hype coming from his time before Oklahoma? Maybe he is a great QB. I'm just trying to figure out where the hype is coming from.
It's absolutely insane that I had to break this down for you to near pre-school levels. Go find a pill to calm down your menopause and then come back and discuss this like a fully-functioning adult.
Posted on 10/23/25 at 1:15 pm to pankReb
quote:
Apparently not as you've been under the assumption that I've been talking specifically about Oklahoma as a team.
Now you're just talking like a woman.
quote:
It's only nonsensical because you lack common sense. Has he performed at a level against P4 defenses that makes him worthy of being hyped up as much as some are doing.....not really.
No he has not, and nobody is still hyping him.
quote:
Where is the hype coming from? Is it the awful defenses that you said he didn't play against before having to specify not talking about the already mentioned P4 teams? Is the hype coming from his time before Oklahoma? Maybe he is a great QB. I'm just trying to figure out where the hype is coming from.
There is no hype coming out on him. There was during the pre-season and especially after Manning tanked in his debut, and not so much since then. And to answer your question above, the "hype" was coming from media clowns who spent the off-season trying to shove Arch-Mania up everybody's asses and then they pivoted to Mateer to cover for their foolishness.
quote:
It's absolutely insane that I had to break this down for you to near pre-school levels. Go find a pill to calm down your menopause and then come back and discuss this like a fully-functioning adult.
You were fighting a battle against a non-existent thing, like a woman. Now pull over and put your eyeliner on in a parking lot before you kill somebody.
This post was edited on 10/23/25 at 1:17 pm
Posted on 10/23/25 at 1:21 pm to CharlotteSooner
quote:
There is no hype coming out on him. There was during the pre-season and especially after Manning tanked in his debut, and not so much since then.
This is all you had to say. Just as simple as that. There have been people on this board talking him up today and yesterday and that is what I was asking about.
All of the dumb shite you've posted so far has been for nothing. You spent an entire page throwing a piss-fit and vomit all over your keyboard only to end up answering my original question.
quote:
There is no hype coming out on him. There was during the pre-season and especially after Manning tanked in his debut, and not so much since then.
That's all you had to say. But instead you couldn't control your emotions.
Posted on 10/23/25 at 1:23 pm to pankReb
Well that was quick. You must be at a stoplight.
Do I need to say there's no bigfoot too?
Do I need to say there's no bigfoot too?
This post was edited on 10/23/25 at 1:24 pm
Posted on 10/23/25 at 1:24 pm to CharlotteSooner
quote:
Well that was quick. You must be at a stoplight.
are you making a comment that I was quick to respond?
Posted on 10/23/25 at 1:30 pm to pankReb
Yes. That's what the comment says.
It doesn't say anything about you gaining weight or how big your arse looks in your jeans so keep it on the road, okay?
It doesn't say anything about you gaining weight or how big your arse looks in your jeans so keep it on the road, okay?
Posted on 10/23/25 at 1:37 pm to CharlotteSooner
quote:
Yes. That's what the comment says.
Then the hilarity of my comment being 6 minutes after your post and then your comment being 2 minutes after mine wasn't missed. I was just wanting to confirm as I'm not sure even you know what you're talking about from one minute to the next.
Posted on 10/23/25 at 1:38 pm to pankReb
6 minutes is pretty fast in terms of eyeliner application. That's why I thought you must've been at a stoplight.
Posted on 10/23/25 at 1:39 pm to CharlotteSooner
You keep digging yourself deeper. Please....continue. It's a fantastic look for you.
Posted on 10/23/25 at 1:51 pm to CharlotteSooner
So… Charlotte Sooner and Pank Reb- give us your predictions for this game. One of the top shelf matchups of the weekend
Posted on 10/23/25 at 2:00 pm to pankReb
I'm sitting at a desk, not putting eyeliner on in my car while swerving into the center median. Of course I can reply faster.
Girl, you better concentrate on the road and stop arguing with me before you pop a titty.
Girl, you better concentrate on the road and stop arguing with me before you pop a titty.
Posted on 10/23/25 at 2:07 pm to Taurus 357
quote:He has problems catching and holding on to the ball in perfect conditions. Concerned with him in the rain.
Sategna gonna feast
Posted on 10/23/25 at 2:10 pm to Taurus 357
That shite got out of hand really quickly....
Posted on 10/23/25 at 2:42 pm to CharlotteSooner
quote:
It's not like our defense sucked last year, and it's all the same guys with upgrades at the CB positions.
I've seen that argument before, usually before a season starts. You have no idea if the players are "upgrades" or not until they face legitimate threats at opposing WR positions.
quote:
To act like they haven't been tested before is laughable.
In 2025, they have not.
quote:
They're a veteran unit from front to back and faced these same teams last year.
You just claimed you have "upgrades" at CB but also faced the same teams last year.
Also, last year you were 6-6 and finished 29th in scoring defense. That's good, but it's not elite. Returning starters from that defense doesn't immediately translate to elite status.
Popular
Back to top



1





