Started By
Message
re: Lunardi's Latest Bracketology
Posted on 2/20/12 at 10:12 am to ShreveportHog94
Posted on 2/20/12 at 10:12 am to ShreveportHog94
quote:
Hahaha no they don't. They mean jack shite unless you're sitting in the damn room discussing them. Have you been in this room I speak of and heard them talk? No you haven't so STFU. All you have proven is you can't beat any good teams, you can only hang around for a bit. Not saying Bams doesn't make it in either but they have work to do.
IF winning is all that matters, then 'Bama wouldn't have gotten snubbed last year.
Resumes are more about impressive wins.
1
Posted on 2/20/12 at 10:14 am to UASports23
In which you have 0 impressive wins. I think Bama may be getting an extra look based on that snubbing from last year.
Posted on 2/20/12 at 10:15 am to ShreveportHog94
LSU shouldnt be in the tourney. I really think we would just embarrass ourselves. At least we are taking advantage of the rest of the shitty teams in the conference
Posted on 2/20/12 at 10:15 am to ShreveportHog94
How is a win over a number 5 seed in the tourney not impressive?
If we can't count a top 5 seed win impressive, than your michigan win is useless.
If we can't count a top 5 seed win impressive, than your michigan win is useless.
Posted on 2/20/12 at 10:16 am to ShreveportHog94
quote:
Hahaha no they don't. They mean jack shite unless you're sitting in the damn room discussing them.
RPI is a huge tool used in the selection of the teams. This has been stated many times by the selection committees over the years. SOS is a major part of the RPI. SOS is the same whether a team wins or loses the game. Understand?
quote:
Have you been in this room I speak of and heard them talk
quote:
? No you haven't so STFU
Why so angry?
Posted on 2/20/12 at 10:16 am to ShreveportHog94
How does Alabama have zero impressive wins? Also, when you lose to good teams your RPI gets a boost from having that team on the schedule. That's a part of the reason Alabama has such a good RPI. If you beat a couple of them then it's that much better and that's why Alabama is in good shape as of now. It's not like all the teams on the bubble behind Alabama have 4-5 great wins. If they did, they wouldn't be on the bubble.
Posted on 2/20/12 at 10:17 am to bigpapamac
Is he putting Washington and Arizona in just because they are in the P-12 a "major" conference or does Lunardi not realize how terrible that conference is this year? Only Cal deserves to be in right now, that's it.
Posted on 2/20/12 at 10:19 am to crankbait
quote:
LSU shouldnt be in the tourney. I really think we would just embarrass ourselves. At least we are taking advantage of the rest of the shitty teams in the conference
I would say we could do some damage in the N.I.T. but I still think we'd drop 1st or 2nd round there. Just have no confidence in this team under TJ.
Posted on 2/20/12 at 10:19 am to 1991UW
Where will Arkansas be in the tourney you ask? Probably the same place as Bama, which is sitting on the coach and watching it from home. One things Arkansas has done that Bama needs is proof that they can beat a good team. Wins over Mich and Vandy are just light years ahead of anything Bama has done thus far this season.
And why would I care where Arkansas is this season? MA has taken a team that wouldn't win 10 games with 90% of the coaches out there. I am more than satisfied with the job he's done.
And why would I care where Arkansas is this season? MA has taken a team that wouldn't win 10 games with 90% of the coaches out there. I am more than satisfied with the job he's done.
Posted on 2/20/12 at 10:20 am to 1991UW
Where will Arkansas be in the tourney you ask? Probably the same place as Bama, which is sitting on the coach and watching it from home. One things Arkansas has done that Bama needs is proof that they can beat a good team. Wins over Mich and Vandy are just light years ahead of anything Bama has done thus far this season.
And why would I care where Arkansas is this season? MA has taken a team that wouldn't win 10 games with 90% of the coaches out there. I am more than satisfied with the job he's done.
And why would I care where Arkansas is this season? MA has taken a team that wouldn't win 10 games with 90% of the coaches out there. I am more than satisfied with the job he's done.
Posted on 2/20/12 at 10:20 am to thunderbird1100
quote:
Is he putting Washington and Arizona in just because they are in the P-12 a "major" conference or does Lunardi not realize how terrible that conference is this year? Only Cal deserves to be in right now, that's it.
I agree it's absolutely terrible and he's (as well as others) have discussed the possibility of that league being a one-bid league throughout the course of the season. When you look at the bottom of the at-large field though at the last teams in and those right at the cut line, you realize how weak the at-large pool is this year.
This post was edited on 2/20/12 at 10:21 am
Posted on 2/20/12 at 10:22 am to thunderbird1100
quote:
Is he putting Washington and Arizona in just because they are in the P-12 a "major" conference or does Lunardi not realize how terrible that conference is this year? Only Cal deserves to be in right now, that's it.
Washington will make it further in the tourney that every SEC team besides Kentucky... maybe even further than Kentucky.
Posted on 2/20/12 at 10:22 am to 1991UW
quote:
maybe even further than Kentucky.
da frick?
Posted on 2/20/12 at 10:23 am to ShreveportHog94
quote:
Wins over Mich and Vandy are just light years ahead of anything Bama has done thus far this season.
Michigan is one whole spot ahead of Witchita St in the RPI and Vandy is a little ways behind both. And Alabama's win over Witchita came on a neutral site, not at home like Arky over Michigan. Brilliant. Should we talk bad losses and overall strength of schedule?
This post was edited on 2/20/12 at 10:25 am
Posted on 2/20/12 at 10:24 am to thunderbird1100
quote:
I would say we could do some damage in the N.I.T. but I still think we'd drop 1st or 2nd round there. Just have no confidence in this team under TJ.
i agree. its depressing.
Posted on 2/20/12 at 10:25 am to bigpapamac
quote:
da frick?
Tony Wroten and Terrence Ross say hi... 1st round NBA picks
Posted on 2/20/12 at 10:26 am to ShreveportHog94
Wichita State are you kidding me? They are not a tourney team in a the SEC or Big 12. They are a cinderella story that writers love to inflate in the off chance that they might be the next Butler.
Posted on 2/20/12 at 10:27 am to 1991UW
quote:
Washington will make it further in the tourney that every SEC team besides Kentucky... maybe even further than Kentucky.
No bias here
UW shouldn't even be in it.
Posted on 2/20/12 at 10:27 am to bigpapamac
Just to show how we fared against NCAA tourney "IN" teams:
@Kentucky(1 seed) closest any SEC team has came to beating them. Came down to the last minute.
Georgetown (3 seed) had to have buzzer beater 3 to beat 'Bama
Florida (4 seed) played without 2 of our best players. Not saying we would have won.
Wichita St (5 seed) beat them on neutral court
Vanderbilt (7 seed) No excuses. Lost. Out played.
Kansas St (9 seed) we got reamed on neutral court in Kansas.
@Miss St (9 seed) they needed a late second score to win.
Purdue (10 seed) We beat them on a neutral court.
@Kentucky(1 seed) closest any SEC team has came to beating them. Came down to the last minute.
Georgetown (3 seed) had to have buzzer beater 3 to beat 'Bama
Florida (4 seed) played without 2 of our best players. Not saying we would have won.
Wichita St (5 seed) beat them on neutral court
Vanderbilt (7 seed) No excuses. Lost. Out played.
Kansas St (9 seed) we got reamed on neutral court in Kansas.
@Miss St (9 seed) they needed a late second score to win.
Purdue (10 seed) We beat them on a neutral court.
Posted on 2/20/12 at 10:29 am to thunderbird1100
quote:
No bias here
UW shouldn't even be in it.
Glad you are on the selection committee... when we were a 11 seed 2 years ago we "shouldn't even have been in" but made it to the Sweet 16 beating Marquette and New Mexico.
Page 3 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News