Started By
Message
re: LSU/South Carolina game moved to Baton Rouge | Game tim 2:30pm CDT
Posted on 10/7/15 at 11:03 am to southpawcock
Posted on 10/7/15 at 11:03 am to southpawcock
quote:
All I know is LSU fans are loving this at the expense of others. Makes me sick, not saying people here are a-holes that just makes me mad. Whatever, it's life.
Most of our fans that were travelling are pissed. SEC dropped our return trip to Cola in 2013 in favor of sending us to Athens and it won't be until 2027 before we come back because of this stupid scheduling.
0
Posted on 10/7/15 at 11:03 am to Pettifogger
quote:
What's the alternative?
To not play the game at all.
Posted on 10/7/15 at 11:03 am to WildTchoupitoulas
quote:
What, like they just went through a bunch of shite no one wants to go through?
You're being disingenuous if you're going to act like that's all some of them were doing.
Posted on 10/7/15 at 11:03 am to CNB
quote:
Because I said that no decision had been made and to wait and see?
It was quite more than that CNB but whatever, hope everything gets better in Columbia, as has been said on here 100x, we do understand and feel for ya'll
Posted on 10/7/15 at 11:03 am to Crowknowsbest
They should call off betting on this game. People shouldn't be able to earn a profit for this shite show.
If they do, mandatory goes to flood victims.
If they do, mandatory goes to flood victims.
Posted on 10/7/15 at 11:03 am to BayouBengals03
Would have preferred it go to a neutral site like Atlanta.
Posted on 10/7/15 at 11:04 am to Wolfhound45
Welcome to Williams Valley. Death Brice? We'll have to see which portmanteau wins out.
Posted on 10/7/15 at 11:05 am to southpawcock
Posted on 10/7/15 at 11:07 am to pvilleguru
I honestly wish they'd move it to Charlotte or somewhere nearby, not fair for LSU to gain a glorified home game imo. I know I'm about to get a lot of down votes but that's just how I feel on the situation.
Posted on 10/7/15 at 11:07 am to LNCHBOX
quote:
You're being disingenuous if you're going to act like that's all some of them were doing.
Not really, I followed that thread yesterday and I felt like while the USC fans were being a little over the top, it was understandable. What I don't really care for is Tiger fans holding their feet to the fire. I wish they would just lighten up and show a little more understanding.
Were the Cocks being dicks? Maybe. That doesn't mean the Tigers have to be pussies.
Posted on 10/7/15 at 11:09 am to Fus0623
quote:
honestly wish they'd move it to Charlotte or somewhere nearby
I honestly think they likely considered all options and did not just say, frick it I guess we're going to BR for this one.
Posted on 10/7/15 at 11:10 am to WildTchoupitoulas
quote:
Not really, I followed that thread yesterday and I felt like while the USC fans were being a little over the top, it was understandable. What I don't really care for is Tiger fans holding their feet to the fire. I wish they would just lighten up and show a little more understanding.
Were the Cocks being dicks? Maybe. That doesn't mean the Tigers have to be pussies.
guess we read different threads.
Posted on 10/7/15 at 11:12 am to Jagd Tiger
quote:
all that rain should help w/ the sandstorms yall seem to be experiencing..
Get fricked.
Posted on 10/7/15 at 11:12 am to BayouBengals03
Posted on 10/7/15 at 11:12 am to Fus0623
quote:No way it could have gone to Charlotte (or any venue in North Carolina). That is ACC country. Just being honest bro. Should have been Atlanta.
I honestly wish they'd move it to Charlotte or somewhere nearby...
Posted on 10/7/15 at 11:13 am to Wolfhound45
quote:
Would have preferred it go to a neutral site like Atlanta.
Atlanta, Jacksonville, Charlotte, Nashville. Very, very surprised by this decision and how 'they' derived at this.
Posted on 10/7/15 at 11:14 am to Wolfhound45
Atlanta was not an option because of Georgia State bro
Posted on 10/7/15 at 11:15 am to Rhino5
Posted on 10/7/15 at 11:16 am to Rhino5
quote:
Atlanta, Jacksonville, Charlotte, Nashville. Very, very surprised by this decision and how 'they' derived at this.
ATL and Charlotte were obvious no gos, and USCe probably decided they'd like to make the most money with the least inconvenience. BR was a no brainer once Columbia was ruled out.
Posted on 10/7/15 at 11:16 am to Rhino5
quote:
Atlanta, Jacksonville, Charlotte, Nashville. Very, very surprised by this decision and how 'they' derived at this.
It was South Carolina's decision.
Atlanta and Charlotte weren't options. I think Jacksonville was the only neutral site location that was even possible. But the idea for South Carolina is still to make money. If they can split the gate/concessions for a game in Tiger Stadium, they'll make more than if the game were in Jacksonville.
Page 5 of 11
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News