Started By
Message
re: LSU Should Threaten To Leave The SEC
Posted on 5/24/13 at 3:27 pm to bamagreycoat
Posted on 5/24/13 at 3:27 pm to bamagreycoat
I
I
I
I
V
I
I
I
V
This post was edited on 5/24/13 at 3:29 pm
Posted on 5/24/13 at 3:29 pm to EvilVodka
quote:
still only 2 SEC Championships to show for it... A Colt McCoy injury, mulligan, and Aaron Murray downing the ball away from 0 BCS championships
These are the reasons the butthurt is magnified by 1000.
Posted on 5/24/13 at 3:30 pm to bamagreycoat
why doesn't UF seem to complain as much about having to play LSU as LSU complains about having to play UF?
Things to ponder.
Things to ponder.
Posted on 5/24/13 at 3:30 pm to bamagreycoat
Hey Pawwwwwwwwwwwwwww I didn't know there were other sports than bama football.
Posted on 5/24/13 at 3:31 pm to LukeSidewalker
quote:
Im positive Les will frick it up.
nah...he's done pretty well over there in Tiger Stadium East
quote:
Because yall have more starters returning than us, and yall played more freshmen and sophomores than anyone in the country.
good to see you're finally catching on, Cleetus
Posted on 5/24/13 at 3:33 pm to wadewilson
quote:
Why would Bama want a tougher schedule? They can't even win all of their games now.
Says the fan of the team with a whopping one undefeated season in the last hundred years - and that being in 1958.
Posted on 5/24/13 at 3:33 pm to Choctaw
quote:
good to see you're finally catching on, Cleetus
It took 3 0f 4, but Im finally starting to see who runs this conference.

Posted on 5/24/13 at 3:33 pm to WaveHog
quote:
why doesn't UF seem to complain as much about having to play LSU as LSU complains about having to play UF?
we're not complaining about playing UF?
but i guess if you don't have to worry about playing for SEC or National Championships you don't care how easy bamas schedule is.
This post was edited on 5/24/13 at 3:37 pm
Posted on 5/24/13 at 3:34 pm to Choctaw
quote:
why doesn't UF seem to complain as much about having to play LSU as LSU complains about having to play UF?
Because they play in the East buddy boy....hmmmm, of the last 7 Nattys for the SEC, how many teams in the East have won it? That's right, only one... our permanant east opponent named FL. We get them plus all the beasts in the West(Not the case for the Gators). Time for that to change
This post was edited on 5/24/13 at 3:37 pm
Posted on 5/24/13 at 3:36 pm to bamagreycoat
Why, so Bama can have an even easier schedule?
Posted on 5/24/13 at 3:37 pm to bamagreycoat
No need, herb Vincent going to fix it for us
Posted on 5/24/13 at 3:38 pm to EvilVodka
quote:
A Colt McCoy injury, mulligan, and Aaron Murray downing the ball away from 0 BCS championships
Yeah, they should have done something more to deserve those titles in those seasons.
Something like losing to Kentucky and getting 50 hung on them at home.
Posted on 5/24/13 at 3:39 pm to reedus23
Really, it's not even about LSU. The current format lends itself to wildly unequal schedules. You have teams that can be in the same division and have nothing remotely close to competitively balanced schedules. Add to it that we use both divisional and cross-divisional games to decide the championship representatives, and it really is an insult to all logic. The difference in playing Mizzou and Tennessee vs. Georgia and Florida to decide who is divisional champions? That is HUGE.
If it's not LSU it will be someone else getting hosed in spite being the better team another year. The odds are already incredibly tilted towards the winner of the BAMA-A&M game representing the West before we enter fall camp on schedules alone.
It's just not sound logic and not in the spirit of competitive balance deciding champions.
If it's not LSU it will be someone else getting hosed in spite being the better team another year. The odds are already incredibly tilted towards the winner of the BAMA-A&M game representing the West before we enter fall camp on schedules alone.
It's just not sound logic and not in the spirit of competitive balance deciding champions.
Posted on 5/24/13 at 3:40 pm to Mohican
quote:
Really, it's not even about LSU. The current format lends itself to wildly unequal schedules. You have teams that can be in the same division and have nothing remotely close to competitively balanced schedules. Add to it that we use both divisional and cross-divisional games to decide the championship representatives, and it really is an insult to all logic. The difference in playing Mizzou and Tennessee vs. Georgia and Florida to decide who is divisional champions? That is HUGE.
If it's not LSU it will be someone else getting hosed in spite being the better team another year. The odds are already incredibly tilted towards the winner of the BAMA-A&M game representing the West before we enter fall camp on schedules alone.
It's just not sound logic and not in the spirit of competitive balance deciding champions
I think you are trying to talk rationally to a board full of Alabama dolts
Posted on 5/24/13 at 3:41 pm to Mohican
quote:
The odds are already incredibly tilted towards the winner of the BAMA-A&M game representing the West before we enter fall camp on schedules alone.
Such is the natural order of things
Posted on 5/24/13 at 3:41 pm to LSU Patrick
frick ya'll whine like little bitches.....Please let us play florida every year just so ya'll will STFU!
frickie frick frick frickers.
frickie frick frick frickers.
Posted on 5/24/13 at 3:44 pm to texasaggie08
quote:
Such is the natural order of things
Guess we'll just have to settle with scoreboard.
Posted on 5/24/13 at 3:44 pm to JustGetItRight
They really only have one undefeated season in a hundred years of football?Damn!
Posted on 5/24/13 at 3:45 pm to geauxcoco
In the past 10 years, UGA has been the best team in the east 4 times. Florida 3 times. Tennessee 2 times. SC 1 time. So again tell me, why does LSU bitch about having to play UF more than Aub bitches about having to play UGA? Hell, UT was neck and neck with UF. Y'all act like it's a dramatic difference.
Back to top
