Started By
Message
Posted on 6/22/12 at 8:54 am to FightinTiga
quote:
As much as I would like to think so I really can't say with confidence that LSU would have.
With all due respect, I think this is a knee jerk response from some LSU fans angry about the rematch. There's no logical basis to think LSU doesn't get a rematch under the exact same circumstances. You have a team (LSU) with BY FAR the most impressive out of conference results of any team in the country. LSU, like Alabama, also blew out every team on their schedule with their lone loss coming to the #1 ranked team on the road in OT. There is NO WAY that LSU doesn't get a rematch ahead of Okie State under those circumstances.
Posted on 6/22/12 at 8:59 am to Riseupfromtherubble
I would actually rather have LSU's resume. In 20 -30 years people will look back and see LSU went 13-1 beat Bama at home, won the west and sec and that Bama went 12-1. Sorry but it will happen. Just like some of bama's questioned titles.
Posted on 6/22/12 at 9:00 am to Rickdaddy4188
quote:
I would actually rather have LSU's resume. In 20 -30 years people will look back and see LSU went 13-1 beat Bama at home, won the west and sec and that Bama went 12-1. Sorry but it will happen. Just like some of bama's questioned titles
amazing.
Posted on 6/22/12 at 9:02 am to Govt Tide
You an I both know that ha it been Texas or Oklahoma in Oklahoma ST's position, Bama is sitting at home.
Which team has a writer resume;
Team a: beat 5 ranked teams and 6 with winning records.
Team b: beat 2 ranked teams and 3 with winning record.
You can't sit there and honestly say team b deserved it over team a. Teams also lost to te opponent at home.
Which team has a writer resume;
Team a: beat 5 ranked teams and 6 with winning records.
Team b: beat 2 ranked teams and 3 with winning record.
You can't sit there and honestly say team b deserved it over team a. Teams also lost to te opponent at home.
Posted on 6/22/12 at 9:02 am to Rickdaddy4188
quote:
I would actually rather have LSU's resume. In 20 -30 years people will look back and see LSU went 13-1 beat Bama at home, won the west and sec and that Bama went 12-1. Sorry but it will happen. Just like some of bama's questioned titles.
OK, you are now one of the biggest morons on this forum bro.

Posted on 6/22/12 at 9:04 am to Rickdaddy4188
quote:
I would actually rather have LSU's resume. In 20 -30 years people will look back and see LSU went 13-1 beat Bama at home, won the west and sec and that Bama went 12-1. Sorry but it will happen. Just like some of bama's questioned titles.
please tell me this is a troll attempt.
Posted on 6/22/12 at 9:05 am to Rickdaddy4188
quote:
You an I both know that ha it been Texas or Oklahoma in Oklahoma ST's position, Bama is sitting at home.
Which team has a writer resume;
Team a: beat 5 ranked teams and 6 with winning records.
Team b: beat 2 ranked teams and 3 with winning record.
You can't sit there and honestly say team b deserved it over team a. Teams also lost to te opponent at home.
lololol
Posted on 6/22/12 at 9:07 am to reel_gator8
quote:
reel_gator8
quote:
Teams lose to other teams sometimes due to the other team wanting it more than them....its called an upset and if there were no upsets, then Vegas wouldnt exist.
so your saying, if people didn't get up set, then they wouldn't gamble? got it.
Posted on 6/22/12 at 9:08 am to Rickdaddy4188
quote:
Rickdaddy4188
ahahahah I love when this pussy comes on the board....he should get one of those awards yall are chalking up....


Posted on 6/22/12 at 9:10 am to thatdude1985
LSU had a far better resume than Bama the last two years. Bama doesn't even have a west title. They were gifted a shot at LSU. Sorry. It's true. Bama had all of the 2011 defense in 2010 plus Julio ,, and a senior qb and lost 3 games. Also LSU is 2-1 the last two years against Bama. Why would I want bama's resume. Travel to other conference boards and you'll see bama's title isn't respected.
Posted on 6/22/12 at 9:13 am to Rickdaddy4188
quote:
Travel to other conference boards and you'll see bama's title isn't respected.

Posted on 6/22/12 at 9:14 am to thatdude1985
Yes I'm a 5'10 220 pound pussy. That's me.
Nothing change the fact that Oklahoma
State had a better resume than Bama. Sorry. I also think Bama was the best team in the country as had the best defense I've ever seen in college. That doesn't mean they deserves to be there.
Nothing change the fact that Oklahoma
State had a better resume than Bama. Sorry. I also think Bama was the best team in the country as had the best defense I've ever seen in college. That doesn't mean they deserves to be there.
Posted on 6/22/12 at 9:14 am to Rickdaddy4188
Hey Ricky, just go back 1 more year and you can add a west title and a NC...i see what your doing here is being super biased and pick at what you type, good job man, I applaud you all the way from the great state of Alabama. or the 50 yard line, Who gives a frick if the title isn't respected...THE TEAM STILL HAS IT...just because a bunch of computer warriors don't like it doesn't mean the shite just disappears...DWI.
Posted on 6/22/12 at 9:16 am to thatdude1985
So your saying the team that lost to IOWA frickING STATE deserved to be there....wait I bet if LSU managed to actually beat Bama on 1/9 you would have a completely different output right? go back to your fricking dungeon.
Posted on 6/22/12 at 9:17 am to Master of Sinanju
IT isn't. Every other conference thinks Bama got an undeserved shot. Sorry it's true. Doesn't mean Bama wasn't the best team. Just means they lost the one hard game they had all year.
Posted on 6/22/12 at 9:18 am to thatdude1985
No you said since 2008. Bottom line you Bama fans have this since of being a better program than LSU and it couldn't be further from the truth. Bama has 4 sec titles since 83. You aren't te Bama team from the 70's.that was the argument. That LSU wasn't on Bama's level.
Posted on 6/22/12 at 9:19 am to Rickdaddy4188
quote:so you're fat and dumb,got it..
5'10 220 pound
Back to top
