Started By
Message

re: LSU now suing in federal court

Posted on 4/3/15 at 7:18 am to
Posted by tmc94
Member since Sep 2012
11559 posts
Posted on 4/3/15 at 7:18 am to
quote:

Even you can understand that just because you are on vacation, that doesn't mean you can do what you like without repercussions. That dog won't hunt...

he took another job. People do it every day. And when you do, you are entitled to your vacation and you continue to get paid through your vacation days. I've double dipped twice in my life exactly like this. It's not at all uncommon. And there are no repercussions to it other than when your previous employer turns all bitter BSC because you left
quote:

Chavis was less than honorable. A&M was less than honorable.

Um, how so? Are you suggesting it's not honorable to hire a coach when he's employed elsewhere? Are you saying it's not honorable to look for a job while employed? Y'alls morel values are myopic to say the least
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
92912 posts
Posted on 4/3/15 at 7:23 am to
quote:

tmc94


Just stop
Posted by chilge1
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2009
12139 posts
Posted on 4/3/15 at 7:24 am to
quote:

Y'alls morel values are myopic to say the least


Aggy gonna Aggy
Posted by RealityTiger
Geismar, LA
Member since Jan 2010
20543 posts
Posted on 4/3/15 at 7:32 am to
You weren't under contract though.

And that is exactly the point of the suit. Chavis and A&M says he wasn't, LSU says he was. A judge will determine who is right.
Posted by spslayto
Member since Feb 2004
21576 posts
Posted on 4/3/15 at 7:33 am to
No. LSU is seeking to move Chavis's suit he filed in state court in Texas to federal court. LSU filed it's suit months ago in state court in Louisiana. Your thread title is wrong.
Posted by Cooter Davenport
Austin, TX
Member since Apr 2012
9006 posts
Posted on 4/3/15 at 7:35 am to
quote:

he took another job. People do it every day. And when you do, you are entitled to your vacation and you continue to get paid through your vacation days. I've double dipped twice in my life exactly like this. It's not at all uncommon. And there are no repercussions to it other than when your previous employer turns all bitter BSC because you left


Exactly.

I don't think these Louisiana frickwits have jobs.

Anyone who has been employed in a legitimate professional capacity knows
1) People change jobs constantly. It's not petsonal.
2) When you do, you get to take your accrued vacation and are still paid until it is up, OR they will just let you go immediately, pay you for two more weeks as if you were still coming to work and then cash you out your vacation days.

I've done it several times. That's the way it works.
Posted by Suck Out West
Phoenix, AZ
Member since Dec 2006
5932 posts
Posted on 4/3/15 at 7:35 am to
Posted by chilge1
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2009
12139 posts
Posted on 4/3/15 at 7:36 am to
There is a huge difference between a contract employee and an at-will employee.

Aggy gonna Aggy
Posted by DBU
Member since Mar 2014
19059 posts
Posted on 4/3/15 at 7:37 am to
Posted by spslayto
Member since Feb 2004
21576 posts
Posted on 4/3/15 at 7:38 am to
quote:


I don't think these Louisiana frickwits have jobs.

Whoa. That's a little out of line.
Posted by Alt26
Member since Mar 2010
33943 posts
Posted on 4/3/15 at 7:40 am to
quote:


It's hilarious how uninformed LSU fans are about the actual situation.

Let me clue you in cupcake. Chavis sued LSU and Texas A&M. He wants the courts to figure out if anything is actually owed. Of course we will pay it. A&M is saying that we don't owe the buyout. LSU is saying that Chavis does. Now, because Chavis's lawyers filed suit before LSU could get their shite together, LSU is pissed because it is not in an LSU friendly jurisdiction, so they file federally.

Get your head out of your arse an actually read something other than a fan blog and you might learn something jizztrap.



What's even more hilarious is the people who clearly have zero legal education spouting off nonsense as if they do.

The lawsuit at issue is the one Chavis filed in Texas state court. LSU is asserting that Texas does not have jurisdiction over the suit because it the subject matter of the lawsuit is a contract that was entered into in Louisiana. That issue has not been decided by the courts as of yet. Nonetheless, LSU as an out of state diverse defendant has removed the lawsuit to Federal Court, as is their option to do. The reasoning is to get the case out what would likely be a plaintiff's friendly venue. I would almost guarantee that A&M would to the exact same thing as a diverse defendant in Louisiana.
This post was edited on 4/3/15 at 7:41 am
Posted by tmc94
Member since Sep 2012
11559 posts
Posted on 4/3/15 at 7:40 am to
quote:

You weren't under contract though.

actually I was. Employment contracts are pretty standard. Being under contract doesn't prohibit anything. It simply defines the terms
Posted by RealityTiger
Geismar, LA
Member since Jan 2010
20543 posts
Posted on 4/3/15 at 7:41 am to


We're not talking about a guy walking away from a 50k job to accept a 60k job down the street.

Contract. Contract. Contract.

There, said it 3 times. Maybe that will get it in your heads.
Posted by RealityTiger
Geismar, LA
Member since Jan 2010
20543 posts
Posted on 4/3/15 at 7:43 am to
Your contract was nothing like his. Did not have nearly the amount of terms to meet.
Posted by spslayto
Member since Feb 2004
21576 posts
Posted on 4/3/15 at 7:43 am to
Exactly. LSU is not the plaintiff. They are trying to move Chavis's suit to federal court. But don't let facts get in the way.
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
92912 posts
Posted on 4/3/15 at 7:47 am to
quote:

actually I was


Actually you're an idiot
Im sure your McDonald's employee contract was as detailed as a major college football coach
Posted by thelawnwranglers
Member since Sep 2007
41810 posts
Posted on 4/3/15 at 7:47 am to
quote:

He was making a pre-emptive strike. Didn't want to wait until 3rd down.


lol

Posted by Alt26
Member since Mar 2010
33943 posts
Posted on 4/3/15 at 7:48 am to
quote:

Exactly. LSU is not the plaintiff. They are trying to move Chavis's suit to federal court. But don't let facts get in the way.


They're not trying to. It is removed to Federal court. A&M can seek to have it remanded back to state court. The federal judge will decide whether to keep the lawsuit or remand
Posted by RealityTiger
Geismar, LA
Member since Jan 2010
20543 posts
Posted on 4/3/15 at 7:50 am to
How cheap and/or trashy does A&M look that it all comes down to this in the first place? If I'm Chavis, I am insulted big time.
Posted by thelawnwranglers
Member since Sep 2007
41810 posts
Posted on 4/3/15 at 7:51 am to
quote:

Exactly. I don't think these Louisiana frickwits have jobs. Anyone who has been employed in a legitimate professional capacity knows 1) People change jobs constantly. It's not petsonal. 2) When you do, you get to take your accrued vacation and are still paid until it is up, OR they will just let you go immediately, pay you for two more weeks as if you were still coming to work and then cash you out your vacation days. I've done it several times. That's the way it works.

lol at comparing your career to this situation
Jump to page
Page First 5 6 7 8 9 ... 21
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 7 of 21Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter