Started By
Message
re: Les Miles on schedule disadvantage
Posted on 7/18/13 at 10:05 am to TigersRuleTheEarth
Posted on 7/18/13 at 10:05 am to TigersRuleTheEarth
quote:
, but the fact that it will take 12 years for some of the teams in the east to rotate back onto our schedule is a disgrace to the league
The current setup since 92' is the only time rotation has come into play in the SEC. Some teams like LSU dipped and dogged teams like UGA for 20+ years, yet now its an issue. since 92' there has been more equal distribution of schedules in all of SEC history
This post was edited on 7/18/13 at 10:06 am
Posted on 7/18/13 at 10:05 am to tigerfan in bamaland
quote:
read that again, I cant find where it says LSU doesnt want to play Florida?
or Where Les said he didnt want to play Florida.
Are you really this dumb?
LSU has repeatedly stated they want permanent rivals dropped. In other words, they don't want to play UF every year.
Posted on 7/18/13 at 10:05 am to Alahunter
quote:
with all the bragging about how great Lsu is to play those schedules, and considering Lsu has lost more than twice as many games the last 5 yrs, yes..
babble on flamer. I know you hate LSU. It's cool.
Posted on 7/18/13 at 10:06 am to PortCityTiger82
There is nothing alabama can do about 6-1-1, we value our rivalry with UT. We will not vote against our values and traditions to make another fanbase happy.
I know saban has argued for 9 games. I assume that means we voted for it although i do not know for sure.
What else would you like us to do?
I know saban has argued for 9 games. I assume that means we voted for it although i do not know for sure.
What else would you like us to do?
Posted on 7/18/13 at 10:06 am to Alahunter
oh ok. I guess since you had two years with a tough opponent its time to take a few years off
This post was edited on 7/18/13 at 10:07 am
Posted on 7/18/13 at 10:07 am to MetryTyger
quote:
That's N O T H I N G........ What about Saban being allowed to lobby for Alabama to play in the 2012 BCSNCG in the SECCG broadcast booth ??? Was Gundy afforded that chance ??????? Noooooooo. That played a part in Bama given a do-over mulligan, despite already LOSING AT HOME to the #1 team.... While Michigan was """""" N O T """""" afforded the same do-over chance vs Ohio State in the 2007 BCSCG.
Posted on 7/18/13 at 10:07 am to PortCityTiger82
quote:
Only reason people complain about "whining" is because they love the easy schedule and having an easier shot at a championship
That is complete bullshite. We complain about the whining because we know just a few short years ago LSU had the easy east teams on their schedule and there wasn't a peep about it because Bama had just finished series with UF/USC
Then after 1-9; then this past year when LSU thought UF was an easy win after they had been predicted to finish no better than 3rd in the east.
Not once has the east record mattered for LSU if they Beat Bama then LSU has always gone to the SECcG over Bama.
Posted on 7/18/13 at 10:08 am to NYCAuburn
quote:
Some teams like LSU dipped and dogged teams like UGA for 20+ years,
Hyperbole sounds great on a messageboard but doesn't really further your point.
quote:
since 92' there has been more equal distribution of schedules in all of SEC history
This does not address my point. The fact that some teams in the same league will not play each other in over a decade is pretty pathetic.
Posted on 7/18/13 at 10:08 am to bona fide
quote:
Are you really this dumb?
Not as dumb as you, tard.
Posted on 7/18/13 at 10:08 am to TigersRuleTheEarth
So then lets go to 9 games.
Posted on 7/18/13 at 10:09 am to CheeseburgerEddie
There have been proposed ways to keep the rivalries and even out the schedule but for some reason they won't do it. Thats what makes it look biased. Plus, its a "bridge" schedule so they could've changed the other cross division opponents this year but they chose not to
Posted on 7/18/13 at 10:09 am to bona fide
quote:
bona fide
Les Miles on schedule disadvantage
quote:
read that again, I cant find where it says LSU doesnt want to play Florida?
or Where Les said he didnt want to play Florida.
Are you really this dumb?
LSU has repeatedly stated they want permanent rivals dropped. In other words, they don't want to play UF every year.
Are YOU really this dumb? Where in the everloving HELL do you get that from? Link ????
Since when are YOUUUUUUUUU a spokesman for LSU. ??? And WTF should you care ????????
Posted on 7/18/13 at 10:09 am to TigersRuleTheEarth
quote:What hyperbole?
Hyperbole sounds great on a messageboard but doesn't really further your point.
LSU didn't play UGA from 53-78.
Posted on 7/18/13 at 10:11 am to CheeseburgerEddie
quote:
So then lets go to 9 games.
Honestly, I wouldn't mind it. It would allow for better games instead of shitty OOC opponents.
OR we could just ditch the permanent East opponents because nobody else in the nation gives a flying frick about the Bama/UT,Auburn/UGA "rivalry".
Posted on 7/18/13 at 10:11 am to TigersRuleTheEarth
quote:
This does not address my point. The fact that some teams in the same league will not play each other in over a decade is pretty pathetic.
pathetic despite it actually accomplishing something that didn't happen in the prior 90+ years. yall want rotation, then bitch about it when the rotation doesn't suit you and favors bama.
Posted on 7/18/13 at 10:11 am to PortCityTiger82
I won't argue over a single year or conspiracy theories about the SEC office. This is how the schedule worked out this year. It is following a pattern, it seems to me we traded UGA for Missouri (who was considered to be the better of the two teams entering the conference) and each new entry got a high profile cross division game.
Who won't do it. As far as I know the 9 game thing is the only thing that has been brought to a vote.
Who won't do it. As far as I know the 9 game thing is the only thing that has been brought to a vote.
Posted on 7/18/13 at 10:11 am to joeyb147
quote:
What hyperbole?
"dipped and dodged" is hyperbole.
Posted on 7/18/13 at 10:11 am to spacewrangler
Then what problem do y'all have with making a schedule that is balanced year in and year out. It seems like this would be something that everyone would want yet some just want to turn a blind eye to it and complain about "whining"
Posted on 7/18/13 at 10:12 am to TigersRuleTheEarth
As I said before Alabama will vote for what they think is right for our values and tradition. That means we think 9 games is better than giving up our rivalry.
Posted on 7/18/13 at 10:13 am to NYCAuburn
quote:
the rotation doesn't suit you and favors bama.
So you finally admit it? The current rotation favors Bama?
Popular
Back to top



1



