Started By
Message
re: Les Miles on schedule disadvantage
Posted on 7/18/13 at 12:28 pm to NATidefan
Posted on 7/18/13 at 12:28 pm to NATidefan
quote:
Coming up, we will draw Georgia and USC over 2014 and 2015 while y'all will draw Mizzou Vandy or Kentucky.
Link? Yall still have vandy to go to when times get tough....Also this all important old rotation says UGA should be nowhere near yalls schedule.
1
Posted on 7/18/13 at 12:30 pm to NATidefan
quote:
Coming up, we will draw Georgia and USC over 2014 and 2015
Alabama will not play Georgia in the regular season in either 2014 or 2015, unless the bottom falls out for Georgia this year. It's ridiculous to think otherwise.
Posted on 7/18/13 at 12:30 pm to frankenfish
quote:
SEC:
Florida
Georgia
Kentucky
South Carolina
Tennessee
Alabama
Auburn
Big 12:
Arkansas
Vanderbilt
LSU
MS State
Ole Miss
TX A&M
Missouri
Vanderbilt
FIFY
Posted on 7/18/13 at 12:31 pm to Adam Banks
No link, but I'll bump this thread to prove to you I was right when the schedule comes out. The rotation they are using is based off the old rotation. It's not that hard to figure out.
Posted on 7/18/13 at 12:31 pm to Monticello
This thread gave me cancer
Posted on 7/18/13 at 12:31 pm to Adam Banks
quote:Do you want to revisit the embarrassing losses from Miles NC year as well?
In our NC season saban got beat by a 8-5 UF team at home by a Zook coached team with a true freshman qb.
quote:The worst score in there is the 2001 game. Unless you expected Saban to turn around a team that won just 7 games the previous 2 years combined and hang with Spurrier's dominating of the 90s (you know, winning 10+ games 9/11 years).
By the other scores I think you can understand why we say UF owned Saban at LSU.
Posted on 7/18/13 at 12:33 pm to joeyb147
quote:
stretching it back to 2011
Such a LOOOOOONNGGGG time ago.
There was a bridge schedule in 2011? Or are you just intentionally ignoring the point?
Posted on 7/18/13 at 12:34 pm to Nuts4LSU
quote:
your annual cakewalk with Tennessee,
Bama is 10-10-1 against UT since they became our cross division opponent. That game has hurt us just as often as it has helped.
Posted on 7/18/13 at 12:34 pm to NATidefan
quote:
The rotation they are using is based off the old rotation. It's not that hard to figure out
Then which is it? Old rotation says UGA this year and gone next year. You say UGA next year (I assume because they weren't on it the past two years) then that throws it off. Why not play them this year? Either the old rotation is important or its not. The officials say its not so why do we get arbitrarily screwed 2 years in a row while Bama gets it easy two years in a row?
Posted on 7/18/13 at 12:34 pm to Nuts4LSU
quote:Did you actually read the OP? Or just jump into the thread because it said schedule in the title?
There was a bridge schedule in 2011? Or are you just intentionally ignoring the point?
"year after year" has nothing to do with bridge schedules.
This post was edited on 7/18/13 at 12:35 pm
Posted on 7/18/13 at 12:34 pm to PortCityTiger82
quote:
so when is Alabamas turn?
(2011 played UF but they were down)2010-2009-2008 and in the future rotation of 2014-15 etc.
The facts are not EVERY YEAR does LSU get the schedule shaft like you swamp kittens would want everyone to believe.
Posted on 7/18/13 at 12:35 pm to Adam Banks
Go read my bridge schedule isn't random thread. Should find it a few pages back in my post history. I'm not typing all that shite again.
Posted on 7/18/13 at 12:36 pm to NATidefan
quote:
21 years isn't the long run yet?
Pretty sure UT, SC, and Georgia have been pretty good in that time frame as well
Are you seriously trying to compare any of those teams to Florida over the divisional play era? Really? Please tell me the Alabama school system has not failed THAT badly.
Posted on 7/18/13 at 12:38 pm to Nuts4LSU
quote:
Either tradition is most important, or fairness is. You sacrifice fairness (in your favor) for tradition to keep your annual cakewalk with Tennessee, but when another proposal does the same (but to your disadvantage in the fairness department), you suddenly think it's ridiculous.
This is the issue. Very well stated. I will add that we certainly don't give a shite about Alabama-Tennessee or Auburn-Georgia. We want fair scheduling.
This post was edited on 7/18/13 at 12:40 pm
Posted on 7/18/13 at 12:39 pm to Nuts4LSU
I can hear you LSU guys fapping from here in Birmingham
Posted on 7/18/13 at 12:40 pm to NATidefan
quote:
Go read my bridge schedule isn't random thread. Should find it a few pages back in my post history. I'm not typing all that shite again.
No I get what you have said on why they went to UK this year as per trying to keep old rotation. However going by that logic yall shouldnt get UGA for another 5 years. Its one or the other. Rotation matters or it doesnt.
Posted on 7/18/13 at 12:41 pm to Nuts4LSU
Good thing there aren't more Florida fans on here. Y'all would have way too many e-blowjobs to give.
Posted on 7/18/13 at 12:42 pm to Nuts4LSU
quote:Why don't we just use the modern divisional era, like you guys like to do. 2000 and forward.
Are you seriously trying to compare any of those teams to Florida over the divisional play era?
Did you know that UGA has won just as many games as UF in that time frame? 126 to be precise.
Posted on 7/18/13 at 12:43 pm to Nuts4LSU
quote:
Are you seriously trying to compare any of those teams to Florida over the divisional play era? Really? Please tell me the Alabama school system has not failed THAT badly.
Well the SEC did what it intended to do. The two leaders of the SEC the past 15 years-UF and LSU were paired. Teams that are peak and valley-UT and Bama-paired. Good not great (except for the times they get once in a lifetime players) got paired-AU and UGA.
This post was edited on 7/18/13 at 12:44 pm
Posted on 7/18/13 at 12:45 pm to Nuts4LSU
quote:
We played 8 games against the east in those three years, and we had these four "easy" ones (UT twice).
so 4 out of the 8 or half of the games were against those "easy" teams, and florida wasn't great for two years, so 6 out of 8 teams without a pulse 55-46 record
51-51 record for bama's east teams over the same period. I can totally see the travesty of the last three years now
This post was edited on 7/18/13 at 12:49 pm
Page 19 of 30
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News