Started By
Message
re: Kirby Needs a Rest
Posted on 12/9/24 at 10:46 pm to djsdawg
Posted on 12/9/24 at 10:46 pm to djsdawg
quote:
The burden is on you to do so. You said you already did it, but you just admitted to not doing it.
Why? I think you know they aren’t comparable.
There is no burden on me at all. You aren't important.
I'm not going to reply anymore. If you want to debunk every year from 2005-2020, be my guest. 2015 however is already more difficult.
This post was edited on 12/9/24 at 10:47 pm
1
Posted on 12/9/24 at 10:52 pm to 3down10
quote:
2015 however is already more difficult.
AP ranks for bama 2015:
16,22
AP ranks for uga 2024:
4,7,11,16
Much more difficult for uga 2024. Not even close.
Posted on 12/9/24 at 11:05 pm to djsdawg
Do
And you didn't even mention our OOC neutral field game against preseason #14 Clemson, who is now in the playoff.
quote:
Schedules were hand picked. This is how you design a schedule to trip up a challenger:
1. Give a single team #4,5,6 ranked teams.
2. Make all 3 of those games away.
3. Add in a 4th high quality team in #15 Tennessee.
It ended up being #3,7,11,14 ranked teams.
Is that a normal slate for bama, lsu?
A good team could conceivably go 0-4 vs that slate. Thankfully we were good enough to split those and win the sec
And you didn't even mention our OOC neutral field game against preseason #14 Clemson, who is now in the playoff.
Posted on 12/9/24 at 11:10 pm to Miznoz
quote:
Missouri played just as tough as schedule on the road, maybe tougher, and you don't hear Drink out there whining
It's not Kirby saying we had the most difficult schedule. Hell, it's not even us fans saying we had the toughest schedule.
It's ESPN's strength of schedule ranking. UGA #1 hardest schedule in the country.
Missouri's "just as tough maybe tougher schedule" had them at #27.
Sort by SOS - ESPN
Posted on 12/9/24 at 11:12 pm to djsdawg
quote:
AP ranks for bama 2015:
16,22
Wrong
Posted on 12/9/24 at 11:16 pm to 3down10
quote:
Wrong
I knew that you already know the comparison doesn’t work. Why can’t you admit it? It’s Not even close.
The ranks I used to compare were pre bowl game FYI.
Posted on 12/10/24 at 12:18 am to Crowknowsbest
Let’s see how it ends. Although Dawg fans already have their excuses queued up in case they get bumped. It just won’t be our players didn’t want to be there or our best players sat. Or will it?
Posted on 12/10/24 at 12:50 am to PDXHorn
quote:
Let’s see how it ends. Although Dawg fans already have their excuses queued up in case they get bumped. It just won’t be our players didn’t want to be there or our best players sat. Or will it?
It’s probably not good for any team to lose 4 players at the end of the season, but we are tough to beat. Proud of the team for overcoming adversity in addition to the schedule.
Posted on 12/10/24 at 6:37 am to Miznoz
quote:
Missouri played just as tough as schedule on the road, maybe tougher, and you don't hear Drink out there whining.
Hilarious suggestion here. We both played at #11 bama, so let’s compare the other ranked opponents:
Uga played #3, 7, and 14.
Mizzou played #15.
Not even close AGAIN.
Posted on 12/10/24 at 7:25 am to mmmmmbeeer
quote:
nd you didn't even mention our OOC neutral field game against preseason #14 Clemson, who is now in the playoff.
That is because it's not a game the SEC gave us.
Posted on 12/10/24 at 7:49 am to djsdawg
But UGA has been getting by in recent years with a weak SEC East coupled with a putrid OOC schedule while Bama would have to fight their way through the West to get to Atlanta.Indeed there were years that the first test UGA faced WAS the SECCG.
Finally you play someone and predictably whining ensues
Finally you play someone and predictably whining ensues
This post was edited on 12/10/24 at 7:50 am
Posted on 12/10/24 at 7:52 am to antibarner
quote:
Bama would have to fight their way through the West
Not once from 2011-2023 did bama play 4 ranked sec opponents in the regular season. No doubt you would whine about it if bama did.
Posted on 12/10/24 at 7:53 am to antibarner
quote:
But UGA has been getting by in recent years with a weak SEC East coupled with a putrid OOC schedule
The putrid OOC part is nonsensical, but even ignoring that part, UGA has never had a schedule like what Texas was blessed with this season. Even the much criticized 2023 schedule had 3 relatively highly ranked teams on it.
Posted on 12/10/24 at 8:32 am to antibarner
quote:
But UGA has been getting by in recent years with a weak SEC East coupled with a putrid OOC schedule while Bama would have to fight their way through the West to get to Atlanta
Never go full retard.
Posted on 12/10/24 at 8:33 am to Tenntig
He learned from Saban. Even when there is nothing to bitch about, find something.
Posted on 12/10/24 at 9:20 am to Taurus 357
quote:
It means you didn’t “demolish” everyone you played like your arrogant bitch arse fanbase thinks
It means you suck at reading and understanding words.
Posted on 12/10/24 at 9:49 am to Tenntig
UGA ended up playing 6 teams ranked in the top 16 this year.
One of those games was at home.
So... kinda a tough road.
One of those games was at home.
So... kinda a tough road.
Posted on 12/10/24 at 9:54 am to Tenntig
quote:
Tenntig
Posted on 12/10/24 at 10:48 am to Porter Osborne Jr
quote:
Never go full retard.
You shouldnt because I'm right.
Posted on 12/10/24 at 10:54 am to antibarner
quote:
because I'm right.
quote:
coupled with a putrid OOC schedule
Try again.
Page 4 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News