Started By
Message

re: joe schad tell em!!

Posted on 12/1/10 at 1:26 pm to
Posted by rbWarEagle
Member since Nov 2009
49999 posts
Posted on 12/1/10 at 1:26 pm to
Hopefully. That hackjob sucks at life.
Posted by fontell
Montgomery
Member since Sep 2006
4558 posts
Posted on 12/1/10 at 1:28 pm to
Reporters need something to report. Otherwise....
Posted by STLSU
Hallandale Beach, FL
Member since Dec 2004
14823 posts
Posted on 12/1/10 at 1:28 pm to
The SAR and the COI enforcement committee deal with two different things. student athelete restoration (of eligibility) is the SAR, and the COI is the committee on infractions that deals with institutional sanctions. Whether or not there will be any sanctions of the latter variety against AU, MSU, UT or whomever has not been addressed at all and an official investigation won't be until the spring at the earliest if at all. So obviously a letter of inquiry from the COI can't be done as an official investigation has not even been started against AU.

ETA the other thing to keep in mind is that anything the FBI has on any of this won't be released until the McGregor trial is finished in April, at the earliest.
This post was edited on 12/1/10 at 1:36 pm
Posted by fox4espn
Monroe
Member since Dec 2006
284 posts
Posted on 12/1/10 at 1:41 pm to
Umm unless im reading something wrong Joe Schad was right. Cecil Newton and Kenny Rogers were guilty or pay for play. If anything this vindicates Schad. Now I think he thought the punishment would be alot worse than it was.
Posted by Nortizzle
Posibarner™ Captain
Member since Nov 2006
23294 posts
Posted on 12/1/10 at 1:42 pm to
quote:

ReauxlTide


Posted by HailToTheChiz
Back in Auburn
Member since Aug 2010
53439 posts
Posted on 12/1/10 at 1:43 pm to
that dude is the worst reporter...he's just trying to cover his arse
Posted by RT1941
Member since May 2007
31647 posts
Posted on 12/1/10 at 2:06 pm to
quote:

The SAR and the COI enforcement committee deal with two different things. student athelete restoration (of eligibility) is the SAR, and the COI is the committee on infractions that deals with institutional sanctions. Whether or not there will be any sanctions of the latter variety against AU, MSU, UT or whomever has not been addressed at all and an official investigation won't be until the spring at the earliest if at all. So obviously a letter of inquiry from the COI can't be done as an official investigation has not even been started against AU. ETA the other thing to keep in mind is that anything the FBI has on any of this won't be released until the McGregor trial is finished in April, at the earliest.


What? The Aubs are saying the investigation has been going on for months and the NCAA has found nothing against AU, and therefore they are letting Cam play.

Now you're saying an official investigation has not even began against AU?
Posted by Alahunter
Member since Jan 2008
90742 posts
Posted on 12/1/10 at 2:09 pm to
quote:

How could they possibly get more info damning Cam, though, considering how much has already come out? The water damaged cell phone, the recorded phone conversations, etc. What else could come out?


^^ Me in the Albert Means yrs.
Posted by rbWarEagle
Member since Nov 2009
49999 posts
Posted on 12/1/10 at 2:10 pm to
Fair enough. We'll see, though.
Posted by RMFTBama
Tuscaloosa
Member since Aug 2009
5285 posts
Posted on 12/1/10 at 2:13 pm to
quote:

At least he isn't as bad as Thayer Evans, with his actions it is very likely he could get sued as his reporting was false and wreckless.


Who's gonna sue him? All they'd be doing is wasting time and money.
Posted by molsusports
Member since Jul 2004
37001 posts
Posted on 12/1/10 at 2:15 pm to
what exactly was reckless (wreckless?) about schad's reporting?

Posted by spslayto
Member since Feb 2004
21575 posts
Posted on 12/1/10 at 2:17 pm to
Yes, cause it took the NCAA only a few short weeks to rule on the whole Reggie Bush thing.
Posted by rangers911
Member since Jun 2009
5159 posts
Posted on 12/1/10 at 2:18 pm to
quote:

what exactly was reckless (wreckless?) about schad's reporting?


I'd have to go back and read but if memory is correct Schad implied Auburn was in trouble and used Innuendo a lot in this. He strayed from the facts and was just outright an idiot on air a few minutes ago when he said the NCAA wanted to get this done for the Heisman vote, that's not even close to what happened and tells me how accurate and what he knows about this entire situation.

He's implied several times that Heisman voters should be careful and put a lot of emphasis on that trying to hurt Newton and Auburn when there was no proof Auburn had done anything and Newton just through the assumption he knows what his father did. At least he's not as bad as Evans, I've never seen a reporter be so bad as Thayer Evans and still have a job.
Posted by STLSU
Hallandale Beach, FL
Member since Dec 2004
14823 posts
Posted on 12/1/10 at 2:42 pm to
basically the NCAA doesn't have shite on Cam right now, just some evidence on Cecil shopping his son along with Rogers to MSU. why the FBI is involved is anyone's guess, but anything they have they won't turn over to the NCAA until they're done with it. perhaps after the mcgregor trial is over in april, if they got something on wiretap from the Colonial and Victoryland investigations but that is just people speculating as to why the fbi is even asking questions about newton.
Posted by tiger chaser
Birmingham Ala
Member since Feb 2008
7700 posts
Posted on 12/1/10 at 2:52 pm to
none of us know what the FBI is finding. itsnot like they post daily updates on twitter. NOBODY knows what they are finding.


Those taped conversations with Milton Mcgregor and Trooper Taylor are gonna be the downfall...ITS JUST A MATTER OF WHEN....
Posted by molsusports
Member since Jul 2004
37001 posts
Posted on 12/1/10 at 3:09 pm to
quote:


I'd have to go back and read but if memory is correct Schad implied Auburn was in trouble and used Innuendo a lot in this. He strayed from the facts and was just outright an idiot on air a few minutes ago when he said the NCAA wanted to get this done for the Heisman vote, that's not even close to what happened and tells me how accurate and what he knows about this entire situation.

He's implied several times that Heisman voters should be careful and put a lot of emphasis on that trying to hurt Newton and Auburn when there was no proof Auburn had done anything and Newton just through the assumption he knows what his father did. At least he's not as bad as Evans, I've never seen a reporter be so bad as Thayer Evans and still have a job.



can you give any specific examples of where he was wrong on something?

the investigation is hardly over and many people think that Auburn could end up being in trouble

If he had people telling him stuff like cam said "the money was too good" it's hard to fault him for reporting that either...

JMO but most non-Auburn fans think Cam must have been aware of what his father was doing.
Page 1 2
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter