Started By
Message
re: It's starting...Cam is Losing the Heismen!
Posted on 11/23/10 at 10:20 am to m2pro
Posted on 11/23/10 at 10:20 am to m2pro
That wasn't even an insult. It's part of being human.
If the media puts your life under a microscope and puts a negative tone to everything then your perception becomes that of the worst person to ever breath a breath of air.
If the media puts your life under a microscope and puts a negative tone to everything then your perception becomes that of the worst person to ever breath a breath of air.
Posted on 11/23/10 at 10:42 am to Herman Frisco
The media didn't put his life under the microscope, they gave him fellatio.
Posted on 11/23/10 at 11:31 am to Ross
quote:
That wasn't even an insult.
ok... now i get where you're going with that.
and no, if my life was under a microscope, i guarantee you i'd come off looking like a saint by comparison to Newton.
for example, look at Tebow.. why did we all get SICK of hearing about Tebow? (we all liked him) but we got sick of hearing about him because he's kickass... he's the real deal.
maybe everyone would look a LITTLE worse under the right perspective of a microscope... but my question to YOU is this: Why does the microscope seem to follow Newton around? it follows him around because he makes an arse of himself regularly. it's nothing to defend or feel bad about. we have courtney fricking upshaw on our team... i'm just saying, let's call a spade a spade and stop defending him like he's worth your energy. in all truthfulness, you should be more pissed at him than anyone. his family might end up having screwed YOUR program -way- up.
Posted on 11/23/10 at 11:33 am to m2pro
quote:
'm just saying, let's call a spade a spade and stop defending him like he's worth your energy.
If he's not worth the energy to defend, he's definitely not worth the energy of being attacked ad nauseum by you. Give it a rest. We get it.
This post was edited on 11/23/10 at 11:34 am
Posted on 11/23/10 at 12:19 pm to Squid
Posted on 11/23/10 at 2:58 pm to HailToTheChiz
ITT, barners trying to hide the fact they're pissed that nobody thinks they can win anything legitimately
Posted on 11/23/10 at 4:43 pm to partsman103
quote:
Correction.
There are two other facts...
1 he signed a paper that wasn't his
2 he purchased a paper online and was caught.
NOT Facts! Cannot and will not be substantiated, doing so would violate fed privacy laws. Some moron said something to some dumbass reporter, the reporter figured it passed his "credibility check" and printed it. It will never be anything but noise to this situation.
Posted on 11/23/10 at 4:46 pm to slacker130
quote:
Cannot and will not be substantiated, doing so would violate fed privacy laws.
Only if a teacher or school released or verified this. If it was privy to a 3rd party, such as Cam telling another student, they could talk about it all day long if they wanted to. The only true fact about this allegation, is that Cam and Co. did NOT deny it and gave it factual validity by saying federal law was violated, giving credence that the report was accurate and true.
Posted on 11/23/10 at 4:52 pm to m2pro
quote:
character has GOT to count for something and cam is a fricking selfish child.
Your boy HEISMAN WINNER Ingram showed a hell of a lot of class after Spurrier and his boys whipped your asses.BTW Ingram didnt deserve the HEISMAN. And thats the bottom line Mr.Butt Hurts.
Posted on 11/23/10 at 4:59 pm to AU1960
DR > Cam... dude's got a games worth more offensive production and doesn't have 7th yr senior, cutblock specialists to run behind.
Posted on 11/23/10 at 5:04 pm to Alahunter
quote:
DR > Cam... dude's got a games worth more offensive production and doesn't have 7th yr senior, cutblock specialists to run behind.
Confused...
Not sure if serious...
Posted on 11/23/10 at 8:07 pm to BamaScoop
quote:
The only thing Cam has said is No Comment and the only thing Chizik has said is This is Garbage. Cam nor the Chiz has said they did nothing wrong.
Actually, what he said was, "I'm standing up here on a very important week trying to defend something that's garbage." He was defending Newton!
A freudian slip/misstatement? It would seem he will have mistakenly got it right!
Popular
Back to top


2






