Started By
Message
re: It’s been 0 years since UGA has won a Natty
Posted on 8/17/22 at 6:46 am to mbogo
Posted on 8/17/22 at 6:46 am to mbogo
quote:
Which was on pace to exceed his numbers in the SECCG.
Explain how zero tds + 65 yards is more than on pace with 1 td + 77 yards.
By my math, that 7 LESS points + 12 LESS yards.
1
Posted on 8/17/22 at 6:56 am to mbogo
quote:
We saw the outcome, a Georgia win in the last minute
the old 15 pt last minute win. classic melt
Posted on 8/17/22 at 7:30 am to DawgCountry
There is a lot of fear in this thread.
I understand why it exists. Unlike teams that rode a star QB to a title (QB's like Trevor Lawrence, Joe Burrow, Cam Newton, Tim Tebow, Deshaun Watson, Vince Young etc), UGA actually built up a roster of talent that was incredibly deep across all positions.
Teams riding a star QB tend to quickly fade when that star QB leaves for the NFL unless they happen to hit the jackpot with two QB's in a row (looking at you Clemson). For UGA that's unlikely to happen... so they're likely to hang around the top of college football for a while. And other teams fear that. They're attacking UGA this much because they know that UGA is unlikely to go anywhere.
It's okay. We welcome your fear.
I understand why it exists. Unlike teams that rode a star QB to a title (QB's like Trevor Lawrence, Joe Burrow, Cam Newton, Tim Tebow, Deshaun Watson, Vince Young etc), UGA actually built up a roster of talent that was incredibly deep across all positions.
Teams riding a star QB tend to quickly fade when that star QB leaves for the NFL unless they happen to hit the jackpot with two QB's in a row (looking at you Clemson). For UGA that's unlikely to happen... so they're likely to hang around the top of college football for a while. And other teams fear that. They're attacking UGA this much because they know that UGA is unlikely to go anywhere.
It's okay. We welcome your fear.
Posted on 8/17/22 at 12:43 pm to DawginSC
quote:
Teams riding a star QB tend to quickly fade when that star QB leaves for the NFL
True
Posted on 8/17/22 at 1:38 pm to djsdawg
quote:
Explain how zero tds + 65 yards is more than on pace with 1 td + 77 yards.
By my math, that 7 LESS points + 12 LESS yards.
See, even when I reply to someone else you feel compelled to respond to me.
Jameson had 7 catches in the SECCG. He had 4 in one quarter of the NC game, early in the 2nd quarter in actual game time. He had 184 yards in the SECCG. If he had 64 yards in one quarter and early 2nd quarter in game time that projects to more than 184 yards.
Posted on 8/17/22 at 1:57 pm to mbogo
quote:
he had 64 yards in one quarter and early 2nd quarter in game time in game 2
He had 100 yards and a TD in one quarter and early 2nd q in game time in game 1.
So again….
How is 100 yards less than 64 yards?
How is 0 points more than 7 points?
This post was edited on 8/17/22 at 3:01 pm
Posted on 8/17/22 at 4:24 pm to djsdawg
quote:
He had 100 yards and a TD in one quarter and early 2nd q in game time in game 1.
So again….
How is 100 yards less than 64 yards?
How is 0 points more than 7 points?
It isn't. But, 64 yards in that time frame is a higher pace than 184 yards in 4 full quarters.
The stat was for yards.
Posted on 8/17/22 at 4:38 pm to mbogo
quote:
isn't. But, 64 yards in that time frame is a higher pace than 184 yards in 4 full quarters. The stat was for yards.
He had 100 yards and a TD in 18 plays/18 minutes in game 1.
He had 64 yards and NO TD in 23 plays/18 minutes in game 2.
So, you were wrong. Way wrong.
Posted on 8/17/22 at 5:29 pm to djsdawg
He’s been wrong since Jan and continues to double down. I fear for his personal safety if we beat Bama again. The excuse bank is empty so he might turn on himself
Posted on 8/17/22 at 5:32 pm to djsdawg
quote:
He had 100 yards and a TD in 18 plays/18 minutes in game 1.
He had 64 yards and NO TD in 23 plays/18 minutes in game 2.
So, you were wrong. Way wrong.
It's simple math. What he had in the entire game was 184 yards. What he had at that point in the NC game was at a greater pace than 184 he had in the SCCG.
TDs are just who scored, not who was most responsible for the score.
Posted on 8/17/22 at 6:48 pm to mbogo
quote:
What he had at that point in the NC game was at a greater pace
I showed you exactly what pace they were on at the same point, which was 18 minutes into each game, and He was not close to his game 1 pace in game 2:
- 64% of his yards
- 0% of his TD’s
Posted on 8/17/22 at 7:37 pm to djsdawg
quote:
I showed you exactly what pace they were on at the same point, which was 18 minutes into each game, and He was not close to his game 1 pace in game 2:
You don't understand what "on pace" means. At the same point in the SECCG JW was on pace to have close to 400 yards. He ended up with 184.
Posted on 8/17/22 at 8:36 pm to mbogo
quote:
You don't understand what "on pace" means. At the same point in the SECCG JW was on pace to have close to 400 yards.
At the same point of the National title game, about how many yards was he on pace to have?
Posted on 8/17/22 at 8:39 pm to djsdawg
LSU handled you last two times...nothing's changed.
Posted on 8/17/22 at 8:56 pm to tiger81
quote:
LSU handled you last two times...nothing's changed.
Besides lsu turning into shite and hiring a coach that can’t beat uga, while uga became a national champion?
This post was edited on 8/17/22 at 9:59 pm
Posted on 8/17/22 at 11:24 pm to djsdawg
quote:
At the same point of the National title game, about how many yards was he on pace to have?
He had 64 in 1.2 quarters. That would extrapolate to 128 in 2.4 quarters, 192 in 3.6 quarters, so 200 plus. He may have had less or he may have had more, but that was the pace he was on in the NC game.
Posted on 8/17/22 at 11:27 pm to Dawg4Life47
Actually if you round up it has been closer to 1 year not 0....... since the nat. champ. was played in january which was 7 months ago.
Posted on 8/18/22 at 7:28 am to mbogo
quote:
He had 64 in 1.2 quarters. That would extrapolate to 128 in 2.4 quarters, 192 in 3.6 quarters, so 200 plus
Ok, now using this same math for game 1…..
100 yards in 1.2
200 yards in 2.4
300 yards in 3.6
So 300 + was the pace he was on in ATL
This post was edited on 8/18/22 at 7:29 am
Posted on 8/18/22 at 3:14 pm to djsdawg
quote:
Ok, now using this same math for game 1…..
100 yards in 1.2
200 yards in 2.4
300 yards in 3.6
So 300 + was the pace he was on in ATL
Yes, I've already said that. It was more like 400. But, a pace is irrelevant when we have the total for the game. We don't have the total for the NC game because he was injured. He was on pace to exceed his SECCG total. He may have had less or more.
Posted on 8/18/22 at 3:23 pm to mbogo
How the times have changed.
Page 9 of 10
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News