Started By
Message
locked post

Is it really true that 10 of Bamas 13 claimed NC are split titles?

Posted on 12/6/11 at 6:26 am
Posted by StPeteLSU
St Petersburg, FL
Member since Oct 2011
1938 posts
Posted on 12/6/11 at 6:26 am
That is what a writer in the Birmingham News stated. I knew there were some bogus ones like where Bama was ranked 20th in one poll but NC in another. But I didnt know they had only half of 10 of the 13 they claim. Interesting.
Posted by Smash Mouth Tider
Member since Sep 2011
2466 posts
Posted on 12/6/11 at 6:27 am to
No
Posted by DennyChimes10
21-0
Member since Mar 2010
1913 posts
Posted on 12/6/11 at 6:28 am to
You're obsessed. And no.
Posted by genro
Member since Nov 2011
61788 posts
Posted on 12/6/11 at 6:30 am to
This post was edited on 12/6/11 at 6:32 am
Posted by Tha Truth
Kenner
Member since Apr 2008
417 posts
Posted on 12/6/11 at 6:32 am to
There's a bunch... 10 seems high but could be right. I'm pretty sure that none of their pre Bryant championships were unanimous. And off top of my head I also know that their 73' and 78' titles are also split. Ironically, they lost to the other title winner in both of those seasons.
Posted by MsGulfCoastTigerFan
Ocean Springs,Ms.
Member since Dec 2007
2450 posts
Posted on 12/6/11 at 6:34 am to
No denying that Bama's history is second to none, but their fans use of 13 is laughable. Credit where credit is due, they have 6 to 8 very credible NC. I say 6 if you want to really be prickish about it, but 8 is the number if you ask me. That alone is pretty damn sweet.
Posted by StPeteLSU
St Petersburg, FL
Member since Oct 2011
1938 posts
Posted on 12/6/11 at 6:34 am to
Ok, I was just referencing the Writer in the following link

LINK
Posted by genro
Member since Nov 2011
61788 posts
Posted on 12/6/11 at 6:38 am to
quote:

No denying that Bama's history is second to none, but their fans use of 13 is laughable. Credit where credit is due, they have 6 to 8 very credible NC. I say 6 if you want to really be prickish about it, but 8 is the number if you ask me. That alone is pretty damn sweet.

There's only one ridiculous one to me: 1941. But that makes up for 1966 when we got totally shafted.

And don't blame us: ask college football warehouse LINK
Posted by Tayday
Lake Charles. LA
Member since Mar 2011
5520 posts
Posted on 12/6/11 at 6:40 am to
Yah you're probably right.. it's the same thing like someone else claiming the NC some of the years they won it.. more than 3 of their NC's are legit but some other stupid school probably claimed some of the years that Bama won outright, just like they did for a few of their questionable ones.
Posted by Jalbow3
Trussville
Member since Oct 2008
4070 posts
Posted on 12/6/11 at 6:42 am to
When you go back to the days before the AP and UPI, you have several teams claiming titles for the same season. I don't think it matters in the whole scheme of things. It was a long time ago.
Posted by bona fide
Burma
Member since Jun 2010
8972 posts
Posted on 12/6/11 at 6:43 am to
It is not correct. I'm sure he considers all the pre-AP era as split. No problem with that.
'09,'92,'78,'64,'61 , were all unanimous.
Using his criteria, all of LSU's titles are considered split.

I personally have no problem with any or all of Bama's titles being split. I'll take split for the next five years in a row, no problem.
This post was edited on 12/6/11 at 6:44 am
Posted by Frankie Knuckles
Member since Jul 2010
2807 posts
Posted on 12/6/11 at 6:46 am to
Yes its true.
Posted by taylormade
Tumbleton
Member since Jan 2011
9802 posts
Posted on 12/6/11 at 6:53 am to
Can we get a Bama NC Board..

Posted by fek101
Member since Apr 2011
283 posts
Posted on 12/6/11 at 6:54 am to
I'm still new to this site but I bet I've seen this crap thread 75 times!
Posted by TigerJeff
the Emerald Coast
Member since Oct 2006
16356 posts
Posted on 12/6/11 at 6:55 am to
yea it's pathetic
Posted by StPeteLSU
St Petersburg, FL
Member since Oct 2011
1938 posts
Posted on 12/6/11 at 6:58 am to
75 times total over the past few years or recently? I just read an article so I posted it. I looked back over a few days and didnt see a thread. But it looks like you have been on here way longer than me. My apologies. Just catching up on some recent articles.
Posted by fek101
Member since Apr 2011
283 posts
Posted on 12/6/11 at 7:01 am to
I read that article also and its probably accurate.
Posted by NYCAuburn
TD Platinum Membership/SECr Sheriff
Member since Feb 2011
57002 posts
Posted on 12/6/11 at 7:04 am to
quote:

And don't blame us: ask college football warehouse LINK
so bama's AD in 83' -84' didn't decide to claim five extra titles because it shed a better light on Alabama football?
Posted by TheCheshireHog
Cashew Chicken Country
Member since Oct 2010
40883 posts
Posted on 12/6/11 at 7:06 am to
quote:

'09,'92,'78,'64,'61 , were all unanimous.

The '64 title wasn't unanimous and the only people that think it was are Bama fans.
Posted by Schwaaz
Member since Sep 2009
7375 posts
Posted on 12/6/11 at 7:08 am to
Why don't you list them with data? If not then find a sharp stick and poke yourself in the eye.
Page 1 2 3 4 5 6
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter