Started By
Message
3
Posted on 5/14/13 at 3:58 pm to cyde
The only argument, someone legitimate IMO, against Bama is they shouldnt have had the chance to play for the title in 2011, which would obviously put a huge damper on the dynasty
They have lost at home each of the last 2 years, which is interesting in it's own right
I think they are dynasty material; everyone needs some help once in a while
They have lost at home each of the last 2 years, which is interesting in it's own right
I think they are dynasty material; everyone needs some help once in a while
Posted on 5/14/13 at 3:58 pm to RT1941
quote:
And sighting the ACC/FSU & BigXII/Oklahoma for comparison's sake.
citing
Alabama fans are geniuses
Posted on 5/14/13 at 3:58 pm to EvilVodka
quote:
2 SEC Titles, same as Tennessee in the 90s
You keep saying this as if it means anything
You should probably scurry back to the rant. You can tell them all how you got those dirty Bama fans good. We wont follow you to tell them the truth.
This post was edited on 5/14/13 at 4:00 pm
Posted on 5/14/13 at 4:00 pm to Buckeye06
quote:
against Bama is they shouldnt have had the chance to play for the title in 2011
Why is that?
Posted on 5/14/13 at 4:01 pm to EvilVodka
quote:
And sighting the ACC/FSU & BigXII/Oklahoma for comparison's sake.
quote:
citing
Alabama fans are geniuses
Well, I see you aren't a total retard. Just a troll....
Carry on with your shite then, and see if you get anyone to support your assertions.
Posted on 5/14/13 at 4:01 pm to EvilVodka
quote:
Is Alabama really a dynasty??
No
Posted on 5/14/13 at 4:03 pm to TigerBait2008
Go on...
Posted on 5/14/13 at 4:03 pm to TreyAnastasio
quote:
Why is that?
Well because the other team lost on the road and had a better schedule, and managed to score more than 6 points in every home game I'd guess
The media absolutely gifted Bama the shot to go to that NCG. I've said this before. Bama was the BEST team in 2011, but they didn't deserve to play for the title. They lost at home, didn't win their conference or their division, and ESPN propelled them to the spot
As I said, they were the best team, just not deserving IMO
Posted on 5/14/13 at 4:03 pm to EvilVodka
quote:
Since '09 Bama - 2 SEC titles. Eveyone else - 1 or fewe 4 years is a great barometer...
If you're using conference championships as the indicater, would the first one for a proposed team be a good place to start?
Posted on 5/14/13 at 4:04 pm to Buckeye06
So who should have gotten in over us?
Posted on 5/14/13 at 4:04 pm to TreyAnastasio
quote:
You know you are on the wrong side of an argument about Bama when the Auburn fans disagree with you.
Everyone has their own right to apply a term as they see fit, but if you arent going to back up your application of the term in a debate with legitimate criteria and facts, then refute all opposition, it makes you look childish.
I am just waiting on some actual criteria or comparisons, not just naming who you think is a dynasty without saying why
Posted on 5/14/13 at 4:04 pm to EvilVodka
quote:
I'll consider Alabama a dynasty when they begin to dominate the SEC, similar to Oklahoma in the Big XII over the last decade
Oklahoma (2002-2012) conference record: 73-17 (.811)
Alabama (2008-2012) conference record: 35-5 (.875)
Idiot
Posted on 5/14/13 at 4:04 pm to Buckeye06
quote:
Well because the other team lost on the road and had a better schedule, and managed to score more than 6 points in every home game I'd guess
The media absolutely gifted Bama the shot to go to that NCG. I've said this before. Bama was the BEST team in 2011, but they didn't deserve to play for the title. They lost at home, didn't win their conference or their division, and ESPN propelled them to the spot
As I said, they were the best team, just not deserving IMO
well said
oh and duck
Posted on 5/14/13 at 4:04 pm to EvilVodka
quote:
2 SEC Titles, same as Tennessee in the 90s
But missing a few BCS titles.
Posted on 5/14/13 at 4:04 pm to Buckeye06
quote:
Well because the other team lost on the road and had a better schedule, and managed to score more than 6 points in every home game I'd guess
The media absolutely gifted Bama the shot to go to that NCG. I've said this before. Bama was the BEST team in 2011, but they didn't deserve to play for the title. They lost at home, didn't win their conference or their division, and ESPN propelled them to the spot
As I said, they were the best team, just not deserving IMO
Teams that lose to under 500 teams dont deserve to play for a championship
Posted on 5/14/13 at 4:06 pm to Patton
quote:
So who should have gotten in over us?
You know who should have gotten in over you.
How can Bama fans really argue this? You put their schedules side by side and it isn't even a debate. It's been 2 years, just admit the media got you into the game, and once there, your team took care of business, and has the crystal to prove it
Posted on 5/14/13 at 4:07 pm to TreyAnastasio
NO, the word dynasty doesn't begin to encompass The Tide's greatness.
Posted on 5/14/13 at 4:08 pm to Buckeye06
quote:Agreed. One played an SEC schedule, obliterated 11 teams, and lost to the #1 team in overtime.
You put their schedules side by side and it isn't even a debate.
The other played a shitty Big 12 schedule, had several close games, and lost to a .500 Iowa State team.
No debate whatsoever.
Posted on 5/14/13 at 4:08 pm to genro
Clearly losing to Iowa state is more respectable than losing to LSU.
Page 5 of 34
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News