Started By
Message
Posted on 9/21/15 at 5:26 pm to Bench McElroy
quote:
turnover margin? I say no. An elite national championship caliber team would have won by a much bigger margin.
Your tears are delicious
Posted on 9/21/15 at 5:29 pm to Tornado Alley
I know it was tipped forward, but I thought the announcers said it had to be intentionally batted. I don't actually know the rule, but I couldn't tell that it was an "intentional bat".
Posted on 9/21/15 at 5:31 pm to Tuskkman
quote:
He is asking the obvious looking forward. You can't seem to take the question for what it is. Ole Miss has never proved they are a great team, and that is with them getting Vandy on the schedule every year, they have never made the SECCG.
I understand the Giants bat a 19-0 New England, and eing a Giants fan I was happy, but if they played again he next week, I still wold favor the 19-0 Patriots. You guys look at the obvious and make out like 5 turnovers will be given to Ole Miss every week, and that hey can throw a ball that should be a pick 6 and get a lucky bounce every week, or have a lineman 6 yards down field on a TD.
The question is what it is, considering Ole Miss got every break, and gave up 500 yards are they a contender, I say no. The are a pretender. Don't act like the question is out in left field.
Do I think Ole Miss goes to the championship game? Probably not but they looked better than Bama on the field. So, why talk shite?
Also, send this email to coach Flood for some grammar and punctuation help.
Besides, what NCG champion didn't need some luck on their side at some point?
This post was edited on 9/21/15 at 5:34 pm
Posted on 9/21/15 at 5:31 pm to melrose
Well, you're a fricking moron so good thing we don't give a frick what you think.
This post was edited on 9/21/15 at 5:36 pm
Posted on 9/21/15 at 5:33 pm to Tornado Alley
Has to intentionally tipped forward, and I got your bitch....... On this dick !!!
Posted on 9/21/15 at 5:37 pm to My Daddy
He clearly intentionally tipped the onside kick.
I'm not going to discuss intent with a non-attorney lay person.
I'm not going to discuss intent with a non-attorney lay person.
This post was edited on 9/21/15 at 5:38 pm
Posted on 9/21/15 at 5:42 pm to Tornado Alley
Seems a little harsh, but okay. I'll get back to studying the rule book?
Posted on 9/21/15 at 5:43 pm to melrose
I'm victory melting. Sorry, brah.
Posted on 9/21/15 at 5:47 pm to Tornado Alley
No worries! I don't blame anyone after this near-perfect weekend. LSU embarrasses Auburn, Ole Miss embarrasses Bama, and Texas and USC both lose.
Posted on 9/21/15 at 8:24 pm to Tornado Alley
How can you prove his intent? Because it clearly looks like he just reaches for the ball, and it bounces off of his hand.
Posted on 9/21/15 at 8:30 pm to My Daddy
I see him clearly attempting to push the ball forward, taking advantage of the inherent advantage the kicking team has in an onside kick situation - the receiving team is generally stationary and the kicking team is not.
Again, I will not discuss intent with a lay person.
Get a J.D. and we'll chat.
Again, I will not discuss intent with a lay person.
Get a J.D. and we'll chat.
Posted on 9/21/15 at 8:35 pm to Tornado Alley
Your dumb arse don't know the intent in his mind, and there is no way to prove it. So LAY that... Get some common sense and we can chat.
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News