If you could pick one team in the SEC to replace

Kentucky out, Texas in.

Mizzou, they don't fit. Texas.

Vanderbilt. Replace it with a public school. frick having inter-conference communication protected from FOIA.

I would get rid of the Huggies scary people and the Missouri toothless tigers. They are detrimental to our fabulous conference. In their place I would take Texas and Clemson. Oklahoma is not going to go anywhere without Oklahoma State and that presents a problem.

I just don't think Missouri fits or ever will fit. I feel like the only people who showed up the day we voted on Missouri were people from Arkansas.

I'm not even really insulting them, it's just that the huge swath of the conference has no ties/interests whatsoever to the state, and that doesn't apply in the same way to other considered states (Texas, NC, etc.).

Zou out UNC in

One of the Mississippi schools out.
Virginia Tech in.

What does tech bring to the table now (serious)? Their football team sucks and has a ton of people transferring out. Basketball is good, for now, but they will return to mediocrity. Their last big championships were the 95 NIT, and 2006 bass fishing.

Atleast that’s all I can remember

What is the rationale for Texas in the SEC? Money?

Personally, I think the most important metric is geography. If the school isn't located in the southeast, it's not a possibility. Austin, Texas is not southeastern at all, and the people from there would agree unanimously. College Station is a push, but East Texas is a slightly better fit.

SEC schools pull TX talent on their own

Great academics, decent athletic program, but they should be better in the big three sports considering how much money they have IMO