Started By
Message
0
Posted on 7/24/23 at 11:13 am to GreatPumpkin
quote:
Not really and they’ve been God Awful for the past 5 years
They've played in the SEC title game twice since joining. Y'all haven't even won a share of the East since 2007. So yes really.
Posted on 7/24/23 at 12:16 pm to MetroAtlantaGatorFan
And they were never within shout of winning it. They’ve never been as close to as good as us last year
Posted on 7/24/23 at 12:18 pm to GreatPumpkin
quote:
And they were never within shout of winning it. They’ve never been as close to as good as us last year
You have to make the game to even have a chance of winning it. Tennesee doesn't do that.
2013 Mizzou won 12 games. When was the last time Tennesee won 12 games?
Posted on 7/24/23 at 12:41 pm to MIzzouMark
You played a relatively easy schedule in 2012. You never had to deal with Bama or LSU. The east was extremely down. You lost to Indiana the next year, not very good for your crowning achievement. What’s it been now like 5 in a row?
Posted on 7/24/23 at 12:43 pm to McMillan
Need to check your tape measure, yours is on the top it seems
Posted on 7/24/23 at 12:47 pm to GreatPumpkin
quote:
You played a relatively easy schedule in 2012. You never had to deal with Bama or LSU. The east was extremely down. You lost to Indiana the next year, not very good for your crowning achievement. What’s it been now like 5 in a row?
And you still have a losing record due to your forfeits RIP.
East had florida Georgia USC ranked and even Vandy went bowling that year. Both mizzou and USC finished top 10 in the nation. And both West teams we played were top 25/15. Then beat top 15 OSU in a bowl by 2 scores.
Preach whatever revisionist history you want though.
Posted on 7/24/23 at 12:51 pm to GreatPumpkin
quote:
You played a relatively easy schedule in 2012. You never had to deal with Bama or LSU. The east was extremely down.
1. What does the 2012 schedule have to do with winning the East in 2013?
2. The East was absolutely not down in 2013. This has been objectively proven time and again.
Posted on 7/24/23 at 12:55 pm to MIzzouMark
If you think anyone puts any stock in the NCAA saying a game magically didn’t happen I don’t know what to tell you. AP rankings are mostly a garbage popularity contest
Posted on 7/24/23 at 12:57 pm to RamboMizzou
quote:
RamboMizzou
Oh there’s a surprise.
Another stalker reply from my second-favorite Dstone12-cessed poster.
Posted on 7/24/23 at 1:00 pm to GreatPumpkin
quote:
you think anyone puts any stock in the NCAA saying a game magically didn’t happen I don’t know what to tell you.
Apparently those pesky record keepers do.
quote:
AP rankings are mostly a garbage popularity contest
Agreed that's why I'm using BCS rankings which had more algorithms.
Posted on 7/24/23 at 1:01 pm to GreatPumpkin
quote:
And they were never within shout of winning it. They’ve never been as close to as good as us last year
2013 SEC Championship game.
Watch the highlights on YouTube and come back and tell us you’re sorry for being a retard.
Posted on 7/24/23 at 1:05 pm to RamboMizzou
quote:
Watch the highlights on YouTube and come back and tell us you’re sorry for being a retard.
Leading a game going into the 4th quarter then losing isn't a close game. Many people who looked at the box score but didn't watch the game told me so.
Posted on 7/24/23 at 1:11 pm to MIzzouMark
BCS weighted in the AP poll into their ranking algorithm if I’m not mistaken. Anyway I think you beat one high quality team that year in A&M. Mizzou was good but they were to 15ish good instead of top 5ish. Loosing to Indiana the next year seems to corroborate that. Do those record keepers have time machines? I wasn’t aware of their ability to change reality?
Posted on 7/24/23 at 1:14 pm to GreatPumpkin
quote:
BCS weighted in the AP poll into their ranking algorithm if I’m not mistaken. Anyway I think you beat one high quality team that year in A&M. Mizzou was good but they were to 15ish good instead of top 5ish. Loosing to Indiana the next year seems to corroborate that. Do those record keepers have time machines? I wasn’t aware of their ability to change reality?
What does the 2014 team have to do with the 2013 team I'm talking about? We lost almost all of our production on offense between those years due to graduations and draft.
If any year had the east down it was 2014.
This post was edited on 7/24/23 at 1:15 pm
Posted on 7/24/23 at 1:19 pm to GreatPumpkin
quote:
They’ve never been as close to as good as us last year
Posted on 7/24/23 at 1:23 pm to MIzzouMark
2014 is one SEC title game drubbings that you lot cling to so fiercely. Also sample sizes are so small that is sometimes useful to look across multiple seasons, it can help gauge overall team depth and quality.
Posted on 7/24/23 at 1:28 pm to GreatPumpkin
quote:
Also sample sizes are so small that is sometimes useful to look across multiple seasons, it can help gauge overall team depth and quality.
Yet you're in here pounding your chest over a single 11 win season with no division title while arguing that our 2013 team was overrated because our 2014 team slept its way to a division title and a double digit win season. That is the epitome of stupid.
This post was edited on 7/24/23 at 1:29 pm
Posted on 7/24/23 at 1:35 pm to MIzzouMark
No my main argument is that you had a relatively easy path both seasons and that you never beat an elite team either year. I love how desperate for acknowledgment and respect Missouri. I don’t think it’s ever going to come either
Posted on 7/24/23 at 1:37 pm to GreatPumpkin
quote:
my main argument was retarded and hypocrisy
Ftfy
Page 5 of 6
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News