Started By
Message
re: If UTx loses to UGA & A&M…
Posted on 11/11/25 at 10:05 am to BamaBravesPackers
Posted on 11/11/25 at 10:05 am to BamaBravesPackers
We aren’t on top. In fact I still have us ranked fourth in the SEC.
Posted on 11/11/25 at 10:08 am to Old Sarge
quote:
We aren’t on top. In fact I still have us ranked fourth in the SEC.
I’m sure that won’t go over well with some of your younger fans. They’ll be here to call you names in 3…2….1…
Btw, thanks to you and all those who have served our country! Grateful to all who’ve paid a price for our freedom, especially including their families!
Posted on 11/11/25 at 10:12 am to BamaBravesPackers
Old Sarge is our school mascot
I appreciate your sentiment, but I have not had the honor of serving my country in my lifetime.
Like you, I have a tremendous amount of gratitude and respect for those that have

I appreciate your sentiment, but I have not had the honor of serving my country in my lifetime.
Like you, I have a tremendous amount of gratitude and respect for those that have
Posted on 11/11/25 at 10:34 am to Mars United
quote:
And yet some of you continue to post on here complaining about our schedule.
We have beaten every team we’ve played, y’all didn’t.
It's just a fact A&M has the weakest schedule in the SEC. Cry more.
Posted on 11/11/25 at 10:36 am to FootballFrenzy
quote:
So angry.
Angry about what?
Posted on 11/11/25 at 10:37 am to 3down10
You’re definitely melting
Posted on 11/11/25 at 10:38 am to 3down10
quote:
Angry about what?
To be honest, I’m not entirely sure, but it’s pretty obvious given your tone that you’re riled about something.
Posted on 11/11/25 at 10:41 am to BamaBravesPackers
All you can play are the teams on your schedule for that year. You have no control over how they perform in other games.
FWIW, I think A&M has looked quite impressive this year, from what I have seen of them.
FWIW, I think A&M has looked quite impressive this year, from what I have seen of them.
Posted on 11/11/25 at 10:41 am to FootballFrenzy
He’s definitely going through the stages of grief
Posted on 11/11/25 at 10:44 am to FootballFrenzy
quote:
To be honest, I’m not entirely sure, but it’s pretty obvious given your tone that you’re riled about something.
I'm just talking about the general philosophy about strength of schedule and so forth when it comes to deciding who is playoff worthy.
As I've said repeatedly, it's not even an issue here really because A&M's schedule isn't at all disqualifying or anything. Yet, A&M fans just can't deal with it and have to make bullshite excuses for it anyway.
You have the weakest schedule in the SEC. Deal with it.
Posted on 11/11/25 at 10:44 am to Old Sarge
quote:
Sorry for beating the crap out of everyone?
aTm will shite the bed in the playoffs. They do it at some point every year.
Posted on 11/11/25 at 10:45 am to 3down10
quote:
You have the weakest schedule in the SEC. Deal with it.
We have been this whole time. It’s other fan bases that are struggling with the concept, for some reason.
Posted on 11/11/25 at 10:46 am to 3down10
According to Grok, Vanderbilt may have been the closest to A&M’s schedule this year and they faced 6 of 8 SEC opponents that ended with 4 losses in 2012 (SEC east…
). Although Grok had slightly flawed logic if UGA does their job this weekend, A&M is on track to shatter this historic record of the softest SEC schedule in the history of the league. With 9 conference games, no one will ever be able to take this title away from them. The softest schedule in SEC history will likely forever belong to our friends from College Station. That’s nothing to be ashamed of since it isn’t their fault, but the reaction of many of their fans to those facts is bringing plenty of shame.
From Grok:
“No, no SEC football team has ever played all conference opponents that finished the regular season with at least 4 losses.
The SEC has never had a season where every team finished with 4 or more losses, which would be required for the condition to even be possible (as a team only plays SEC opponents, not the full conference slate). The closest came in 1990, when the league’s 12 teams combined for a 59-56 overall record (.513 winning percentage), averaging just under 5 losses per team—but four teams (Tennessee, Auburn, Alabama, and Florida) finished with 3 losses each, preventing any one team from facing only the 8 teams with 4+ losses.
In the rare seasons with 8+ teams at 4+ losses (e.g., 2012 with 8 such teams), no SEC team played all of them due to the 8-game conference schedule limiting matchups. For instance, that year, Vanderbilt (which went 5-3 in SEC play) faced only 6 of the 8 teams with 4+ losses, missing two due to scheduling rotations. Similar gaps occurred in other high-loss years like 1999 (9 teams at 4+ losses) and 2000 (8 teams), where no team drew a slate exclusively from those groups.
SEC scheduling has historically emphasized rivalries and rotations over aligning with end-of-season outcomes, making this feat structurally unlikely even in down years for the league.”
From Grok:
“No, no SEC football team has ever played all conference opponents that finished the regular season with at least 4 losses.
The SEC has never had a season where every team finished with 4 or more losses, which would be required for the condition to even be possible (as a team only plays SEC opponents, not the full conference slate). The closest came in 1990, when the league’s 12 teams combined for a 59-56 overall record (.513 winning percentage), averaging just under 5 losses per team—but four teams (Tennessee, Auburn, Alabama, and Florida) finished with 3 losses each, preventing any one team from facing only the 8 teams with 4+ losses.
In the rare seasons with 8+ teams at 4+ losses (e.g., 2012 with 8 such teams), no SEC team played all of them due to the 8-game conference schedule limiting matchups. For instance, that year, Vanderbilt (which went 5-3 in SEC play) faced only 6 of the 8 teams with 4+ losses, missing two due to scheduling rotations. Similar gaps occurred in other high-loss years like 1999 (9 teams at 4+ losses) and 2000 (8 teams), where no team drew a slate exclusively from those groups.
SEC scheduling has historically emphasized rivalries and rotations over aligning with end-of-season outcomes, making this feat structurally unlikely even in down years for the league.”
Posted on 11/11/25 at 10:46 am to 3down10
Before the season started, it was considered one of the strongest
But we can’t control that schedule we can control out of conference
We scheduled and beat a top 10 national title contender
How did your Florida State cupcake game go?
But we can’t control that schedule we can control out of conference
We scheduled and beat a top 10 national title contender
How did your Florida State cupcake game go?
Posted on 11/11/25 at 10:48 am to bunkerhill
quote:
All you can play are the teams on your schedule for that year. You have no control over how they perform in other games. FWIW, I think A&M has looked quite impressive this year, from what I have seen of them.
Literally no one is arguing against this. I’m not trying to be mean, but I’m not sure what your point is? Are you saying we shouldn’t talk about a historic moment in the conference because it isn’t Aggie’s fault?
Posted on 11/11/25 at 10:48 am to Old Sarge
quote:
Before the season started, it was considered one of the strongest
Doesn't matter.
quote:
But we can’t control that schedule we can control out of conference
Doesn't matter.
quote:
We scheduled and beat a top 10 national title contender
Your schedule would probably be ranked in the 60s if you hadn't.
quote:
How did your Florida State cupcake game go?
Doesn't matter.
These are the same excuses G5 teams make when they pretend they belong.
This post was edited on 11/11/25 at 10:49 am
Posted on 11/11/25 at 10:48 am to BamaBravesPackers
quote:
but most of the A&M fans are acting like Tenn fans when they have a moment of success. Not a good look at all
What is the worst look, is you and people like you posting this same thread over and over. I have not seen one Aggie start a thread saying we played a difficult schedule. I have only seen Aggies saying we played the schedule we were given.
And before playing any games this season we were seen as a middle of the pack team.
So quit posting the same f-ing thread over and over
Posted on 11/11/25 at 10:49 am to FootballFrenzy
quote:
We have been this whole time. It’s other fan bases that are struggling with the concept, for some reason.
Posted on 11/11/25 at 10:49 am to BamaBravesPackers
But each of those teams has an additional loss because
Drumroll please
Texas A&M beat that arse
Drumroll please
Texas A&M beat that arse
Posted on 11/11/25 at 10:50 am to geoag58
quote:
What is the worst look, is you and people like you posting this same thread over and over. I have not seen one Aggie start a thread saying we played a difficult schedule. I have only seen Aggies saying we played the schedule we were given.
And before playing any games this season we were seen as a middle of the pack team.
So quit posting the same f-ing thread over and over
A&M fans sounds like the fans of G5 teams when they try to tell everyone they belong.
And again, it's not even needed.
Popular
Back to top



1




