Started By
Message
re: If I were a Tennessee fan I would be hating too....
Posted on 9/5/11 at 4:25 pm to NBamaAlum
Posted on 9/5/11 at 4:25 pm to NBamaAlum
quote:
But if they're still this close, would Saban abandon the system without a clear advantage for one over the other?
By the time LSU rolls around, UA will have played Penn State, Arkansas, and FL...with two of those on the road. Things will sort themselves out accordingly.
True. I certainly don't expect week 1 to be indicative of week 2 or week 10. Just noting that we have a very solid secondary, and if these guys continue to show a propensity to make bad decisions due to their inexperience, it could be a problem. But they won't be inexperienced by the LSU game and they'll have the opportunity to play in front of the home crowd. That will be a big factor.
I still believe LSU's year is 2012.
1
Posted on 9/5/11 at 4:28 pm to Tiger Authority
quote:
Just noting that we have a very solid secondary, and if these guys continue to show a propensity to make bad decisions due to their inexperience, it could be a problem
I will lose my shite if the "Gmac" plan isn't in play. Dump passes and screens ftw against LSU.
quote:
But they won't be inexperienced by the LSU game and they'll have the opportunity to play in front of the home crowd. That will be a big factor.
I thank the Good Lord every night that it is in Tuscaloosa.
quote:
I still believe LSU's year is 2012.
Keep Mett out of bars.
Posted on 9/5/11 at 4:33 pm to volfan30
quote:
Tennessee has more SEC titles, more national titles, domination head to head, more overall wins, and a better winning percentage.
Yes, you guys are miles ahead of us.
OK OK OK OK....Tennessee and Minnesota and UCLA and Army have better football programs than we do...there you go "happy historian"
Posted on 9/5/11 at 4:39 pm to Xanadu
I figured I might be dealing with one of the football began in 2003 people.
Posted on 9/5/11 at 4:42 pm to Analyze That
quote:
Keep the marines away too
I like how Mett went from Capt. Rapehair to clean shaven...
Posted on 9/5/11 at 4:42 pm to volfan30
quote:
I figured I might be dealing with one of the football began in 2003 people.
Yes Michigan is the best program ever because they've manged a half a title in the last 60 years. I love titles in 1940, they're so important to the current landscape of college football bickering over the ability of fanbases to act superior based on what a bunch of guys did when facemasks didn't exist.
Posted on 9/5/11 at 4:45 pm to Tiger Authority
So 2003 is the cut off date of importance, then?
Posted on 9/5/11 at 4:46 pm to volfan30
quote:
So 2003 is the cut off date of importance, then?
Only person in this thread to say that is you bro. Seems like you want that to be the date.
Posted on 9/5/11 at 4:48 pm to GeauxWarTigers
Just wondering when it is. I've already learned that the 40s are meaningless? I'd just like to know when the results became meaningful. That's all.
Posted on 9/5/11 at 4:49 pm to volfan30
quote:
So 2003 is the cut off date of importance, then?
Of course not, don't be obtuse. But I am realistic in understanding that your title pre-1960 doesn't mean dick. Neither does ours. Well, except for those times when you say "we won this many titles."
At the end of the day, your ability to have more all-times wins and titles is meaningless in the current landscape. You're a good program, we're a good program, and I live in that world.
Posted on 9/5/11 at 5:29 pm to Alahunter
2010 - 325 yds 21 pts
2009 - 452 yds 24 pts
2008 - 366 yds 29 pts
2007 - 510 yds 41 pts
I'm ok with yall having him.
How bout putting wins and losses by those figures...it'd be more accurate...sometimes numbers don't mean shite... 
2009 - 452 yds 24 pts
2008 - 366 yds 29 pts
2007 - 510 yds 41 pts
I'm ok with yall having him.
How bout putting wins and losses by those figures...it'd be more accurate...sometimes numbers don't mean shite...
Posted on 9/5/11 at 5:30 pm to Alahunter
Had 2 injured RB's, erratic line play and the secondary(Lsu's) was tore up with arguably the 2nd best pass defense in the nation. Chavis is good, no doubt. But he's got weaknesses and Bama seems to be able to exploit them.
Yep, we saw that last year didn't we....
Yep, we saw that last year didn't we....
Posted on 9/5/11 at 5:30 pm to tiger chaser
I think it goes W, W, W, L with those dates.
Posted on 9/5/11 at 6:03 pm to NBamaAlum
quote:
I think it goes W, W, W, L with those dates.
Really? You have no teeth...I am confident of this.
Posted on 9/5/11 at 6:04 pm to Xanadu
quote:
Really? You have no teeth...I am confident of this.
Que?
The dates listed were '07, '08, '09, and '10. When did Chavis leave UT?
Posted on 9/5/11 at 6:04 pm to volfan30
quote:
Just wondering when it is. I've already learned that the 40s are meaningless? I'd just like to know when the results became meaningful. That's all.
what year did UT quit bothering with results?
Posted on 9/5/11 at 6:05 pm to Maximus
08. Well, 05 really, but Cutcliffe bailed him out in 06 and 07.
Posted on 9/5/11 at 6:13 pm to volfan30
quote:
So 2003 is the cut off date of importance, then?
Nah Id have to go with 2001....Lets start there...
Posted on 9/5/11 at 6:45 pm to chilld28
quote:
Does noticing that Lee's passing yards (98) equal the number of shoes the police took from JJ as evidence the same thing as Pattern recognition?
They took 49 I believe.
Page 3 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News