Started By
Message
re: If a and m went through their season again
Posted on 11/17/12 at 12:25 pm to Draconian Sanctions
Posted on 11/17/12 at 12:25 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
I really don't give a damn about you being on sportscenter or not. I know it's a new experience for you but settle the frick down.
so stupid. good ol' l$u the all time team...oh wait. you guys were shite for a very long time. no matter what you have deluded yourselves into believing , you are not bama.
4
Posted on 11/17/12 at 12:28 pm to SECTXAg06
And you're the new Arkansas
Congrats
Call us when you got crystal in the trophy case
Congrats
Call us when you got crystal in the trophy case
Posted on 11/17/12 at 12:29 pm to Gradual_Stroke
quote:
and the poor tsips are going to shrink while the Texas Aggies are going to grow.
Do you guys have to bring up UT in every thread?
Posted on 11/17/12 at 12:30 pm to SECTXAg06
quote:
oh wait. you guys were shite for a very long time
We were 12th all time in wins when Saban was hired. We're now 11th. quote:
you are not bama.
Few programs can match them, but we're still a traditional power and top 10 all-time program.
I can also spell out, in excruciating detail, how we are far superior to Texas A&M in each and every way if that's what you want.
Posted on 11/17/12 at 12:30 pm to RobNation
:stilllittlebrother:
Posted on 11/17/12 at 12:32 pm to SECTXAg06
quote:
oh wait. you guys were shite for a very long time.
And somehow we are still 28-20-3 against TAMU
Posted on 11/17/12 at 12:33 pm to cas4t
cas4t, do you consider the winning of a crystal football to be the sole indicator variable as to whether or not a team ought to be characterized as "successful?" Genuinely curious what you think.
Posted on 11/17/12 at 12:34 pm to EKG
trophy case= success
Posted on 11/17/12 at 12:35 pm to RobNation
quote:
Do you guys have to bring up UT in every thread?
I rarely see Ags on this website bring up the horns. I think you're perpetuating a manufactured talking point. That being said, we've got a ridiculously long & rich history with 'em; so they'll probably come up in conversation from time to time.
Posted on 11/17/12 at 12:35 pm to tiger perry
Absolutely, tiger. But that wasn't my question.
Posted on 11/17/12 at 12:36 pm to EKG
quote:
cas4t, do you consider the winning of a crystal football to be the sole indicator variable as to whether or not a team ought to be characterized as "successful?" Genuinely curious what you think.
If you want to be a true first tier program than eventually you're going to have to hoist one up.
Retroclaiming 1913 and 1920-whatever also makes you look pretty bad and like a wannabe.
Posted on 11/17/12 at 12:36 pm to EKG
quote:
That being said, we've got a ridiculously long & rich history with 'em; so they'll probably come up in conversation from time to time.
nobody here cares
Posted on 11/17/12 at 12:37 pm to EKG
That's the highest honor. But success could be winning your conference too.
For instance, Arky hasn't done either (at least in a very long time) yet they've beaten some good teams over the last 5-10 years and had good bowl games.
But Arky =/= successful
For instance, Arky hasn't done either (at least in a very long time) yet they've beaten some good teams over the last 5-10 years and had good bowl games.
But Arky =/= successful
Posted on 11/17/12 at 12:41 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
nobody here cares
That may indeed be the case; though I've found "nobody," "everybody," "always," "never," and "classy," to be the most overused words on the Interweb.
I don't think Ags care whether you care or not; but on a football message board, it's not unheard of for a fan of a school to occasionally reference a team they've faced for 100+ years.
This post was edited on 11/17/12 at 12:42 pm
Posted on 11/17/12 at 12:42 pm to EKG
quote:
do you consider the winning of a crystal football to be the sole indicator variable as to whether or not a team ought to be characterized as "successful?" Genuinely curious what you think.
I can answer that. Before the start of this season, TAMU has 31 losses since 2007 and 0 conf champ.
LSU has 14 losses, 2 conf titles and 1 nat champ
Bama has 11 losses, 1 conf title and 2 nat champ.
Tell me the "successful" programs out of these 3.
It's great that Sumlin and JFF have turned the corner for your program, but until beating teams like Bama actually count for something other than finishing 3rd in the SEC West you should probably lay off the maroon kool-aid.
Posted on 11/17/12 at 12:43 pm to RobNation
I don't disagree at all, Rob. Just asking the question.
Posted on 11/17/12 at 12:44 pm to EKG
Posted on 11/17/12 at 12:46 pm to mrnegative
you can say that about every team. Perhaps LSU beats UF and Bama but loses to aTm. Or aTm loses to tech. Maybe Bama doesnt come out flat and beats you. Hindsight is 20-20. pointless thread.
Posted on 11/17/12 at 12:47 pm to EKG
Successful to me is being competitive for West invite to ATL on a consistent basis. By competitive I mean one of the favorites, not 'well, if the stars align". If this is true, other things fall into place...good bowl invites, 10/11 win season, etc.
Posted on 11/17/12 at 12:50 pm to SECTXAg06
And you are not LSU. think we've proven that the last 2 times we played you. Welcome to 3rd place in the west troll.
Page 4 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News