Started By
Message

re: I don't guess Glen Dorsey was enough...........

Posted on 12/1/08 at 5:24 pm to
Posted by BamaInHsv
Huntsville
Member since Nov 2008
17889 posts
Posted on 12/1/08 at 5:24 pm to
quote:

You do not know because your the typical BAMMER


You're right. I should follow all things Auburn. Except I don't care to. And btw... if it shows my "join date" to this board, read it. I wasn't here when that happened last season. This is the first board I've ever been on that wasn't a "Bama" board.

Hey WarEagle24.... Saturday stung a little bit, huh?
Posted by WarEagleTwentyFour
Member since Jan 2008
2179 posts
Posted on 12/1/08 at 5:30 pm to
After the game CTT says"Alabama is a good team,Saban is a good coach,they beat our arse and AUBURN will get things fixed.

I believe Auburn fans feel the same.There willnot be a bunch of belly aching & excuses,like we've heard the lasy 6 years
Posted by BamaInHsv
Huntsville
Member since Nov 2008
17889 posts
Posted on 12/1/08 at 5:31 pm to
Not from TT, I know. From guys like you? Sure :)
Posted by WarEagleTwentyFour
Member since Jan 2008
2179 posts
Posted on 12/1/08 at 5:36 pm to
I am a college football fan and I do not despise the bama football team.I think yall will put the smackdown on the gators.Anyway post often
Posted by JB Bama
Tuscaloosa, AL
Member since Sep 2008
2670 posts
Posted on 12/1/08 at 6:19 pm to
Talked to a friend who's inside reffing and got this response from the SEC Coordinator of officiating (off the record)

"Pretty easy to see how it was missed U had a bunch of big uglees blocking his look, H had already released, R was chasing the QB, L had trips he had to help with. Tough situation for them to be in."

It should have been called clipping and the player ejected.
Posted by PJinAtl
Atlanta
Member since Nov 2007
13997 posts
Posted on 12/1/08 at 6:24 pm to
quote:

It should have been called clipping and the player ejected.


When did a clip become grounds for an ejection?
Posted by arlo
Member since Oct 2007
12376 posts
Posted on 12/1/08 at 6:25 pm to
quote:

It should have been called clipping and the player ejected.


I'd think differently about it if Pugh had just hit him above the waist. Hitting from behind below the knee can blow out a knee or ankle. It's just cheap anyway you look at it.
Posted by JB Bama
Tuscaloosa, AL
Member since Sep 2008
2670 posts
Posted on 12/1/08 at 6:27 pm to
edit: Got a response

"If I had seen everything as I am able to in this video, I would say flagrant. This is different than the normal interior line blocking that we see and expect. This would be a foul even if it had happened in close line play as it is below the knee. Might not call it flagrant here as it seemed to have little effect on the blockee. Also depends on what else may have transpired during the game involving that player."
This post was edited on 12/1/08 at 6:30 pm
Posted by Tigergrl26
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Nov 2006
1158 posts
Posted on 12/1/08 at 9:08 pm to
Nice to see you bastards paying attention to the dirty playing down in Auburn now.

I tuned into the Opening Drive this morning to hear Barker griping about it and all I could think was "where were you buttholes at last year?".
Posted by Ponchy Tiger
Ponchatoula
Member since Aug 2004
48794 posts
Posted on 12/1/08 at 9:32 pm to
Wow, I am glad he wasn't hurt. This shite is unbelieveable. What more proof does the SEC need?
Posted by TTC
SEC
Member since Oct 2008
52 posts
Posted on 12/1/08 at 9:34 pm to
This ain't Pughs first rodeo

CLICK HERE
Posted by Squid
Goodlettsville
Member since Sep 2006
1342 posts
Posted on 12/1/08 at 10:18 pm to


Do we have an emoticon featuring the grassy knoll? I'd like to request one.
This post was edited on 12/1/08 at 10:19 pm
Page 1 2 3
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter