Started By
Message
0
Posted on 10/9/12 at 7:30 pm to CNB
quote:
English motherfricker
I actually had trouble reading it.
This post was edited on 10/9/12 at 7:31 pm
Posted on 10/9/12 at 7:38 pm to TT9
Well, I see every flame I had has been covered. Carry on.
Posted on 10/9/12 at 7:41 pm to Porter Osborne Jr
35-7. Now it has been covered for the SC guys.
Posted on 10/9/12 at 7:41 pm to redfish99
quote:
How pathetic is the dawgs schedule
Schedule is pathetic.
Schedule are pathetic.
OP was right besides leaving off the possessive apostrophe in "dawgs". Bunch of dumb in this thread.
This post was edited on 10/9/12 at 7:44 pm
Posted on 10/9/12 at 7:41 pm to Porter Osborne Jr
Right now we can lose one game....then we'll have the head-to-head tiebreaker with them. Can't lose 2, unless UGA falls to UF or perhaps to Ole Miss or AU, somehow....
Oh, and of course that loss can't be to UF...we need to beat UF more than we need to beat LSU, to be honest. But while we're at it, why not beat them both?
Oh, and of course that loss can't be to UF...we need to beat UF more than we need to beat LSU, to be honest. But while we're at it, why not beat them both?
This post was edited on 10/9/12 at 7:49 pm
Posted on 10/9/12 at 7:43 pm to ConwayGamecock
With the stupid way they run the rules, we need to not lose a single game...
UGA did not deserve the SECCG berth they got last year...
UGA did not deserve the SECCG berth they got last year...
Posted on 10/9/12 at 7:44 pm to redfish99
quote:Just as pathetic as LSU's Offense.
How pathetic is the dawgs
Posted on 10/9/12 at 7:44 pm to putergod
Not our fault SC couldn't beat a bad Auburn team.
Posted on 10/9/12 at 7:47 pm to dawg4lyfe
We had the same overall record.
We beat you.
It's simple.
We beat you.
It's simple.
Posted on 10/9/12 at 7:49 pm to putergod
quote:
overall
No, you had an inferior SEC record.
Posted on 10/9/12 at 7:49 pm to putergod
quote:
We had the same overall record.
We beat you.
It's simple.
Doesn't matter, you guys would have been blown out in the SECCG.
Posted on 10/9/12 at 7:50 pm to GCTiger11
quote:
OP was right besides leaving off the possessive apostrophe in "dawgs". Bunch of dumb in this thread.
Did you read the rest of the OP?
Posted on 10/9/12 at 7:51 pm to redfish99
quote:
How pathetic is the dawgs
Post less.
Posted on 10/9/12 at 7:52 pm to CNB
Yeah the rest is derp, but the subject-verb agreement on the first sentence is right.
Posted on 10/9/12 at 7:54 pm to GCTiger11
he was right, it's just the way he titled his thread
Posted on 10/9/12 at 7:55 pm to Dandy Lion
quote:
quote:overall No, you had an inferior SEC record.
Apparently reading comprehension > you
Posted on 10/9/12 at 7:56 pm to TT9
Bama is the same way. They miss the three best teams in the East. Is what it is.
Posted on 10/9/12 at 7:56 pm to dawg4lyfe
quote:
Doesn't matter, you guys would have been blown out in the SECCG.
Most likely, yes... still deserved the chance though.
Posted on 10/9/12 at 7:57 pm to GCTiger11
quote:
Yeah the rest is derp, but the subject-verb agreement on the first sentence is right.
I gave that the benefit of the doubt, since the thread title runs off into the subject. Most people probably see "How pathetic is the dawgs" and immediately respond without reading.
Page 2 of 3
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News