Started By
Message
re: How many true dynasties have SEC teams had?
Posted on 5/28/13 at 12:12 am to CtotheVrzrbck
Posted on 5/28/13 at 12:12 am to CtotheVrzrbck
How about a definition of dynasty. Minimum of what...3? 50% of the NC's in a given amount of time?
1
Posted on 5/28/13 at 12:13 am to Wild Thang
101
This post was edited on 5/28/13 at 12:14 am
Posted on 5/28/13 at 12:14 am to POCKET
Sparta had 3 of those.
============
never mind
============
never mind
This post was edited on 5/28/13 at 12:15 am
Posted on 5/28/13 at 12:14 am to dbt_Geaux_Tigers_196
quote:
How about a definition of dynasty. Minimum of what...3? 50% of the NC's in a given amount of time?
He wont specify, but it was an obvious troll against programs that have had a lot of success in the big three.
Posted on 5/28/13 at 12:15 am to CatFan81
quote:X 1,000
He wont specify, but it was an obvious troll against programs that have had a lot of success in the big three.
Posted on 5/28/13 at 12:17 am to CatFan81
quote:
the big three.
UA - football, UK - hoops, LSU - baseball
Posted on 5/28/13 at 12:17 am to dbt_Geaux_Tigers_196
quote:
UA - football, UK - hoops, LSU - baseball
Correct.
Posted on 5/28/13 at 12:19 am to harmonics
the order also I think
Posted on 5/28/13 at 12:19 am to dbt_Geaux_Tigers_196
I wouldn't classify UK BBall as a dynasty. A power house for sure.
Not enough titles in a short timeframe, plus they cheated like hell.
Not enough titles in a short timeframe, plus they cheated like hell.
Posted on 5/28/13 at 12:21 am to Wild Thang
Let me guess, the only true dynasty in college basketball is UCLA? 
Posted on 5/28/13 at 12:22 am to Wild Thang
Well, they've won over half the SEC titles so I'll give a little leeway.
My question is, who might have the best chance of a dynasty in two of those sports, with the traditional 'at least 3 in 6 years' definition.
My question is, who might have the best chance of a dynasty in two of those sports, with the traditional 'at least 3 in 6 years' definition.
Posted on 5/28/13 at 12:25 am to CatFan81
quote:
Let me guess, the only true dynasty in college basketball is UCLA?
I'd say their title streak is a dynasty, yes. They cheated like hell too, but they won.
What period of UK ball makes them a dynasty? I am not downplaying UK, just stating facts ma'am.
ETA: UCLA won like 10 titles in a row. UK has 7 total. Which would be the dynasty?
This post was edited on 5/28/13 at 12:27 am
Posted on 5/28/13 at 12:27 am to dbt_Geaux_Tigers_196
quote:
My question is, who might have the best chance of a dynasty in two of those sports, with the traditional 'at least 3 in 6 years' definition.
On second thought, baby steps. An NC in all three? UF maybe?
This post was edited on 5/28/13 at 12:28 am
Posted on 5/28/13 at 12:28 am to Wild Thang
quote:
They cheated like hell
Dude..... Come on.... Welcome to reality. This applies to any dynasty to one extend or another.
Posted on 5/28/13 at 12:29 am to Wild Thang
So there is no other dynasty, other than UCLA? Just making sure that you're not putting Duke or UNC up there and leaving Kentucky out, because other than UCLA... Kentucky is the closest you can get to a dynasty in NCAA basketball.
Kentucky Championships: 1948, 1949, 1951, 1958, 1978, 1996, 1998, 2012
Duke Championships: 1991, 1992, 2001, 2010
UNC Championships: 1957, 1982, 1993, 2005, 2009
Kentucky Championships: 1948, 1949, 1951, 1958, 1978, 1996, 1998, 2012
Duke Championships: 1991, 1992, 2001, 2010
UNC Championships: 1957, 1982, 1993, 2005, 2009
This post was edited on 5/28/13 at 12:30 am
Posted on 5/28/13 at 12:31 am to CatFan81
quote:
Kentucky Championships: 1948, 1949, 1951,
Isn't that a dynasty?
Posted on 5/28/13 at 12:31 am to harmonics
quote:
Dude..... Come on.... Welcome to reality. This applies to any dynasty to one extend or another.
I'll grant that, and you know that applies to bama football as well.
But again regarding UK ball, 7 or 8 titles spread out over a 100 years is not a dynasty.
Posted on 5/28/13 at 12:32 am to Wild Thang
quote:
UK has 7 total.
Eight total.
quote:
UCLA won like 10 titles in a row
Out of their eleven total. And they weren't all back to back. 1964, 1965, 1967, 1968, 1969, 1970, 1971, 1972, 1973, 1975, 1995
Posted on 5/28/13 at 12:32 am to CatFan81
quote:
1948, 1949, 1951, 1958
That is a dynasty.
Posted on 5/28/13 at 12:34 am to Wild Thang
quote:
I'll grant that, and you know that applies to bama football as well.
Anyone who tries to play the "they cheated" card needs to be slapped in the face. Of course. And, it's not just dynasties to which it applies to. so, you know...yeah..
Page 6 of 9
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News