re: How many true dynasties have SEC teams had?

Claiming 1964 is automatic DQ from the conversation. Hell they changed the rules because of how ridiculous it was to have a team lose their bowl game and be the champion over an undefeated better team.


3 titles in 30 years is not a Dynasty, Bama thanks for playing go back to finger fricking your assholes. You can apply again in 5 years.

Not really. 64 is a hot button.


If you can't admit that changing the entire process to awarding titles was admitting it was flawed and they had it all kinds of screwed up.

If the same system was in place in 65 we'd have won that one.

I claim 4 titles for Arkansas. 1909, '64, '65, and a share of '77. There's some room for discussion but Bama claims at least 10 titles that there is no strong argument for them being the champ.

I do admit that Alabama had very very good teams, and Bryant was one of the best in the biz. Until you guys can hone up to what you actually won and didn't win, you can't be taken serious as a Dynasty or anything other than a false idol for the tree killer and teabaggers of the world.