Started By
Message

re: Finebaum said Committee may leave out Bama, Ole Miss and USCe and just avoid the drama.

Posted on 12/1/24 at 8:45 pm to
Posted by SquarePizzaRebel
Atlanta, GA
Member since Nov 2013
3106 posts
Posted on 12/1/24 at 8:45 pm to
quote:

I expect Alabama to get in over SC and Ole Miss. Everyone wants to see Milroe and the 17 year old phenom, Ryan Williams. Ole Miss isn't deserving having lost to lousy teams. South Carolina will be blocked because they are way to good and no one else would have a chance. Texas, UGA and the Vols are already in the field.


OM has some argument with having dominated USCe, and well… you know.
Posted by countrytiger60
Larose
Member since Sep 2018
4171 posts
Posted on 12/1/24 at 9:06 pm to
LSU is not mad. they beat both teams that Bama lost to.
Posted by navy
Parts Unknown, LA
Member since Sep 2010
31347 posts
Posted on 12/1/24 at 9:08 pm to
Most serious Gumps would likely agree.
Posted by TMRebel
Oxford, MS
Member since Feb 2013
7101 posts
Posted on 12/1/24 at 9:09 pm to
They need to do this and put State in everyone’s place. WILD CARD BITCHES!
Posted by Dallaswho
Texas
Member since Dec 2023
3373 posts
Posted on 12/1/24 at 9:10 pm to
Why on earth would the committee want to avoid drama? Have you ever watched ESPN?
Posted by JamalMurry27
Tennessee Titans
Member since May 2023
7562 posts
Posted on 12/1/24 at 9:10 pm to
They want drama
Posted by BZ504
Texas
Member since Oct 2005
12741 posts
Posted on 12/1/24 at 9:43 pm to
I’ll have respect for the committee if they leave Alabama out. They let them in last year when Florida State should have been there. Last year Bama probably deserved it because they won the SEC. This year, not so much. Losing to Vandy and Oklahomo should knock you out.
Posted by FoTownBam
Foley Al
Member since Oct 2023
3899 posts
Posted on 12/1/24 at 9:45 pm to
quote:

Bama bias is dead as is their program.

LSU lost 42-13 to a dead program, lol
Posted by Clames
Member since Oct 2010
18829 posts
Posted on 12/1/24 at 9:53 pm to
quote:

What he means is the committee wants to avoid a flood of LSU tears.



With a flood of gump tears?
Posted by RogerTempleton
Austin
Member since Nov 2014
3294 posts
Posted on 12/1/24 at 10:01 pm to
why would SMU still get in?
Posted by SECdragonmaster
Order of the Dragons
Member since Dec 2013
17312 posts
Posted on 12/1/24 at 10:02 pm to
Bammers have argued for two years that expanding the playoffs was a pointless exercise.

Now they switched to begging for a 3 loss team to have a chance to play for the title.

Have some dignity and just pipe down.
Posted by Diego Ricardo
Alabama
Member since Dec 2020
11234 posts
Posted on 12/1/24 at 10:04 pm to
quote:

Finebaum said Committee may leave out Bama, Ole Miss and USCe and just avoid the drama.


That's not going to happen. There is no controversy. Alabama has a head to head over South Carolina and a better resume than Ole Miss. The ACC, Big-12, and MWC are all 1-bid conferences now after the results yesterday. The media and coaches both have Alabama at 11th; I expect Alabama to be no worse than 11th in the CFP rankings. The Big Ten and SEC will be 4-bid conferences (Oregon, Penn State, Ohio State, Indiana, Texas, Georgia, Tennessee, Alabama). Notre Dame gets in as an independent at-large.

If the committee wanted to bury Alabama, they would've done it after the loss to OU but they kept them in position where 2 teams in at-large position with weak records lose and they're narrowly back in the bracket. And guess what happened yesterday?
This post was edited on 12/1/24 at 10:08 pm
Posted by Dirk Dawgler
Georgia
Member since Nov 2011
3875 posts
Posted on 12/1/24 at 10:06 pm to
UGA is in win or lose. They will justify by saying the extra game (conference championship) was not a factor. They will have three 2 loss SEC teams or two 2 loss and one 1 loss SEC team. Everyone else waits on their lower tier bowl destinations.

The only way SEC gets a 4th is if UGA wins. If they lose, PF’s scenario happens.
Posted by Diego Ricardo
Alabama
Member since Dec 2020
11234 posts
Posted on 12/1/24 at 10:10 pm to
quote:

UGA is in win or lose. They will justify by saying the extra game (conference championship) was not a factor. They will have three 2 loss SEC teams or two 2 loss and one 1 loss SEC team. Everyone else waits on their lower tier bowl destinations.

The only way SEC gets a 4th is if UGA wins. If they lose, PF’s scenario happens.


Miami is not going to be ranked in the top 12 on Tuesday considering how much they fell the last time they lost a game. They have a weak resume and the winning alone kept their position.

Clemson v. SMU largely doesn't matter. Hell, Clemson winning probably pushes Alabama up in seeding. ACC is a 1-bid league after Clemson and Miami lost yesterday.

Georgia will not be punished for the 3rd loss in a 13th game. Nor will Texas losing change the math at all either because Texas would likely just fall a few spots and host a home first round game while Georgia gets the first round bye.
This post was edited on 12/1/24 at 10:12 pm
Posted by Don Quixote
Member since May 2023
4088 posts
Posted on 12/1/24 at 10:18 pm to
finebaum is 1000% about saying contentious crap just to stir the pot and get callers riled up for rating.

In short: he's a hack, always has been
Posted by TripleBarrelBluff1
Sin City
Member since Aug 2024
2430 posts
Posted on 12/1/24 at 10:25 pm to
quote:

I guess I'll give you credit that you've stuck to your guns even after reality basically pantsed you in front of the entire world.


Ain't no strategy like the doubling down on stupid strategy.
Posted by TrueLefty
St. Louis County
Member since Oct 2017
18296 posts
Posted on 12/1/24 at 10:33 pm to
quote:

Bammers have argued for two years that expanding the playoffs was a pointless exercise.

Now they switched to begging for a 3 loss team to have a chance to play for the title.

Have some dignity and just pipe down.

Is Freeze going to turn the Auburn football team around to get to at least 6 wins next year?
Posted by TX Tiger
at home
Member since Jan 2004
37613 posts
Posted on 12/1/24 at 10:36 pm to
quote:

Clemson beating SMU makes it easy for them.

Clemson and SMU would both get in then.
True, and then if UNLV beats Boise? Would the committee keep their promise not to punish a team for losing in a conference championship game?

If so, both UNLV and Boise St would also make the playoffs, completing the field. That would not only knock out Bama's chances, but also push out another team that didn't play for a conference championship.

Who would that be? Indiana (one loss), Ohio State (two losses) or Tennessee (two losses)?
Posted by AbSnopes
Birmingham
Member since Dec 2020
1117 posts
Posted on 12/1/24 at 10:40 pm to
Bama bias is dead as is their program.

This from an LSU fan. How bad did Bama destroy LSU this year?
Posted by TrueLefty
St. Louis County
Member since Oct 2017
18296 posts
Posted on 12/1/24 at 10:43 pm to
quote:

Clemson beating SMU makes it easy for them.

Clemson and SMU would both get in then.
True, and then if UNLV beats Boise? Would the committee keep their promise not to punish a team for losing in a conference championship game?

If so, both UNLV and Boise St would also make the playoffs, completing the field. That would not only knock out Bama's chances, but also push out another team that didn't play for a conference championship.

Who would that be? Indiana (one loss), Ohio State (two losses) or Tennessee (two losses)?

Do you realize that UNLV and Boise St. are in a lesser conference and don't have a top 25 roster ranking? Those types of teams usually get blown out in Bowl games against teams with top 25 roster ranking.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter