Started By
Message
0
Posted on 3/24/25 at 9:51 pm to TrueLefty
quote:
Which team(s) are you talking about? please tell me. Losing to South Carolina at South Carolina the talent level is pretty much being equal.
quote:
but he hasn't blown games when talents are equal or close to equal in the last few years
Incredible.
Posted on 3/24/25 at 9:52 pm to WilliamTaylor21
quote:
talent level is pretty much being equal.
Oof
But South Carolina was favored in that game and was at South Carolina. Mizzou was never favored.
I was wrong about South Carolina has equal talents. They have the edge in talents. Go check that out.
This post was edited on 3/24/25 at 10:51 pm
Posted on 3/24/25 at 9:54 pm to TrueLefty
cOoL
Lost bigly
Lost bigly
Posted on 3/24/25 at 10:16 pm to TrueLefty
quote:
But South Carolina was favored in that game and was at South Carolina. Mizzou was never favored
So now you've moved the goalposts from talents to whether Mizzou was favored or not.
What is your excuse for them losing to Kansas State and Wake Forest in 2022?
Posted on 3/24/25 at 10:27 pm to SidewalkTiger
quote:Mizzou did not have better talents! Those were far back and Drinkwitz wasn't an experienced HC back then. That is why I used the last two year for NIL and the new transfer portal rule changes. You got to be kidding me when you have BK that has coached for a very long time couldn't get it done all those years. Drinkwitz is getting better as a HC. BK? Still hasn't won a championship at the D1 level.
So now you've moved the goalposts from talents to whether Mizzou was favored or not.
What is your excuse for them losing to Kansas State and Wake Forest in 2022?
Posted on 3/24/25 at 10:32 pm to WilliamTaylor21
quote:
cOoL
Lost bigly
Go check in the last 2 years which game was Mizzou favored and lost the game? Zero. BK on the other hand lost I am not sure how many games LSU was favored and lost.
Posted on 3/24/25 at 10:42 pm to SidewalkTiger
quote:
Which team(s) are you talking about? please tell me. Losing to South Carolina at South Carolina the talent level is pretty much being equal.
quote:
but he hasn't blown games when talents are equal or close to equal in the last few years
If you check the talents back then South Carolina had a slight edge. Plus being at South Carolina and the quarterback was by far much better. The quarterback won the game for South Carolina. What am I missing? The spread was I think 8 for South Carolina. Mizzou lost the game by 4 points. Why is this Drinkwitz/Mizzou fault for losing the game against South Carolina? Go check the roster talents for South Carolina and Mizzou. South Carolina has the edge. So I am right once again.
Posted on 3/24/25 at 10:47 pm to TrueLefty
quote:
Which team(s) are you talking about? please tell me. Losing to South Carolina at South Carolina the talent level is pretty much being equal.
I am wrong about this one. South Carolina has the edge.
Posted on 3/24/25 at 10:59 pm to TrueLefty
quote:
Mizzou did not have better talents!
Another lie.
You need to change your name to FalseLefty.
quote:
Those were far back and Drinkwitz wasn't an experienced HC back then.
It was his third season.
Posted on 3/25/25 at 12:26 am to SidewalkTiger
quote:
Mizzou did not have better talents!
Another lie.
You need to change your name to FalseLefty.
quote:
Those were far back and Drinkwitz wasn't an experienced HC back then.
It was his third season.
South Carolina has the better quarterback that was the key to their win over Mizzou last year. Why is South Carolina being pre ranked very high for this coming season? If you look at some key guys it was South Carolina having the better players at some key position. That is why they beat Mizzou. It is really close to being equal. But South Carolina did have the better quarterback last season. I am still going with my statement saying South Carolina has the advantage of some key starting players. The experts correctly picked South Carolina to win the game. The line was a touchdown favorite for South Carolina. And the game was at South Carolina. I was wrong about the talent being in South Carolina favor. But if you look at the key position it is the quarterback. South Carolina was by far better than what Mizzou had with Cook.
This post was edited on 3/25/25 at 12:57 am
Posted on 3/25/25 at 12:32 am to TrueLefty
quote:
This came from the article
So, one of three possible people and no one has set themselves apart yet. But he's ready to claim, in March, that this team without a known starting quarterback - the most impactful position - is the best he's ever had.
It's OK for him to just not say stupid shite like that.
Posted on 3/25/25 at 1:18 am to SidewalkTiger
quote:
Mizzou did not have better talents!
Another lie.
You need to change your name to FalseLefty.
quote:
Those were far back and Drinkwitz wasn't an experienced HC back then.
It was his third season.
I was wrong but I still go by the starting position at quarterback and some other key position that help beat Mizzou. Odds was in Carolina favor at home. Also the experts picked Carolina to win the game.
Drinkwitz was in his third season with a roster with 1 5* and few 4* HS players. Then Losing DC and DL coach set the team back a little. Yet he got the team to be ranked higher than LSU in the last 2 years in the final poll. Did you not forget the COVID year that didn't really help him without a Spring game and had limited practice? The evaluation of the players was bad that time because the COVID year made it look good but it was false hope. He went to Mizzou with a below average SEC roster. I am happy so far with what he has done at Mizzou and shall get the football program better each year from now on.
Posted on 3/25/25 at 5:43 am to TrueLefty
I didn’t think much about him when he was hired. I thought he was a guy who’d be there 3 years and the go be a coordinator somewhere after he was fired. But I gotta tip the cap. Drink can coach. It’s hard to win at Mizzou consistently and he has done it.
Posted on 3/25/25 at 5:58 am to TrueLefty
quote:
Which team(s) are you talking about? please tell me. Losing to South Carolina at South Carolina the talent level is pretty much being equal.
Yes I was wrong about equal if you look at the starters from South Carolina and the starter from Mizzou. Key postion player is quarterback. That one goes to South Carolina and he was the one won the game for his team. LSU should be ashamed to have BK blowing a chance to win a championship with that quarterback. Now he has one of the top roster to compete for a championship this year. I doubt he will win a championship at LSU.
Posted on 3/25/25 at 7:49 am to TrueLefty
quote:
I was wrong about South Carolina has equal talents. They have the edge in talents.
Posted on 3/25/25 at 7:59 am to Mizz-SEC
Not only that, but they then try to spin the whole thing into their dipshit fan boi Lonn trolling Mizzou with his retardation, which makes them look even more retarded than Lonn, the original retard in all of that.
Posted on 3/25/25 at 8:03 am to VagueMessage
quote:
But he's ready to claim, in March, that this team without a known starting quarterback - the most impactful position - is the best he's ever had.
Except, he never said that.
Posted on 3/25/25 at 9:42 am to Faurot fodder
All I know is that Mizzou has talents. And Drink says we have good talents. I am telling you we have good talents and Drink is needing a little more time to beat many teams. I am telling you that.
Posted on 3/25/25 at 10:45 am to SidewalkTiger
Um, LSWho poached and made him the highest paid in college...
Page 5 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News