Started By
Message
re: Dr. Ed Feng's Preseason Power Rankings
Posted on 6/27/16 at 4:03 pm to WG_Dawg
Posted on 6/27/16 at 4:03 pm to WG_Dawg
quote:
sucker. I subscribe to dr feng so I get all the latest feng-takes hot off the presses. I'll never be feng-less again like some pleb.
How much? I'd be willing to pay some serious cash for something like that.
0
Posted on 6/27/16 at 4:06 pm to Serraneaux
A&M too high 
Posted on 6/27/16 at 4:12 pm to Serraneaux
quote:
1. Bama
2. FSU
3. LSU
4. Clemson
5. Oklahoma
6. Stanford
7. Tennessee
I mean Stanford has been a really good program for several years but I just don't see how anyone can rank this team in any preseason list. They literally lost the entire team minus McCaffrey. To me this is a 7-5, 8-4 team at max.
Posted on 6/27/16 at 5:48 pm to Herman Frisco
quote:
I thought LSU had the #1 team in the world.
Posted on 6/27/16 at 6:18 pm to Serraneaux
Thanks for leaving out
8. Mississippi
and
10. Aggie
Nobody cares about them anyway
Also pretty good list, except LSU didn't play in the 2013 BCS title game
8. Mississippi
and
10. Aggie
Nobody cares about them anyway
Also pretty good list, except LSU didn't play in the 2013 BCS title game
Posted on 6/27/16 at 6:34 pm to Serraneaux
Love me some Dr. Feng but he's a bit conservative on VOLS imo
Posted on 6/27/16 at 7:02 pm to cbi8
Aggy at 10 
Posted on 6/27/16 at 7:05 pm to CrimsonBoz
quote:consider the source.
List is shite
Posted on 6/27/16 at 8:50 pm to TT9
Just wasted 2 or 3 minutes of my life scrolling through "Dr. Feng's" 15 through 50 looking for fricking Arkansas. Had them at 12. You can't rank Arkansas at 12. Our D will be nasty. You've been told. But there are waaaay to many unknowns on offense.
Arkansas at 12? I'm out.
frick you Feng!
frick YOU! lol.
Arkansas at 12? I'm out.
frick you Feng!
frick YOU! lol.
This post was edited on 6/27/16 at 8:51 pm
Posted on 6/27/16 at 8:51 pm to Serraneaux
The VOLS will make history.
Posted on 6/27/16 at 10:38 pm to cbi8
Kentucky too high.
Posted on 6/28/16 at 6:48 am to TouchdownTony
It's really difficult to rank a program without a returning QB highly IMO. Alabama is the only program that I've seen that can turn that position over and have the position coached up and perform at a high enough level to compete for titles, which they have done multiple times now with McElroy, McCarron, Simms and Coker.
Anyone else there-regardless of how well they performed last year or what they have returning this year-needs to be a little lower until they prove what they have under center.
I don't personally feel as if superior QB play is a necessity to compete and play for national titles. But I do feel as if having a question mark there limits a truly objective attempt to project how a team will do on the field.
Anyone else there-regardless of how well they performed last year or what they have returning this year-needs to be a little lower until they prove what they have under center.
I don't personally feel as if superior QB play is a necessity to compete and play for national titles. But I do feel as if having a question mark there limits a truly objective attempt to project how a team will do on the field.
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News