Started By
Message

re: Does the SEC need to address how it determines division winners?

Posted on 12/3/12 at 4:44 pm to
Posted by volfan30
Member since Jun 2010
41180 posts
Posted on 12/3/12 at 4:44 pm to
quote:

Tennessee won't see another SEC Title for 20 years or longer.


Posted by therick711
South
Member since Jan 2008
25931 posts
Posted on 12/3/12 at 4:45 pm to
quote:

Since the expansion and division split, Alabama is 10-10-1 against Tennessee



Since expansion Bama had to vacate roughly 3 million wins. Is that on the field?
Posted by Tiger n Miami AU83
Miami
Member since Oct 2007
45656 posts
Posted on 12/3/12 at 4:49 pm to
quote:

Alabama may have been the best team in the SEC West, but I am not 100% sure.


Agree. Bama was potentially the 3rd best team in the West this year. LSU was just as good, and by the 2nd half of the season, A&M was better.

quote:

Thoughts? In this scenario, how would you feel about Team A going to the SECCG over Team B?


Hard to put a team with 2 SEC losses over a team with 1 SEC loss even under your scenario.

Scheduling inequality was a real problem this year. Like Spurrier said, the two teams with the easiest schedule in the SEC this year were the two teams in Atl.

Does not mean they were the best.
Posted by Bluefin
The Banana Stand
Member since Apr 2011
13392 posts
Posted on 12/3/12 at 4:56 pm to
It is simple to determine division winners by awarding points for division and OOD games. Division wins are 1 point, OOD wins are .5 points.

The OOD still mean something, but obviously not as much as division games. Most points at the end of conference play goes to SECCG.

For this year:

West
Alabama - 6 points
LSU - 5.5 points
Texas A&M - 5.5 points

East
Florida - 6 points
Georgia - 6 points
South Carolina - 5.5 points

Alabama and UGA go to SECCG.

I know it doesn't change anything if Team A has a harder OOD draw than Team B but it's just another way of looking at how winners could be determined. Of course I'm bias towards this system because SC would've gone to Atlanta last year so that may be why.
Posted by TigerBait2008
Boulder,CO
Member since Jun 2008
35529 posts
Posted on 12/3/12 at 4:59 pm to
quote:

As for the topic, I like the way things are decided now.


quote:

Alabama Fan




I'm sure you do..
Posted by attheua
Tuscaloosa
Member since Apr 2008
5442 posts
Posted on 12/3/12 at 5:08 pm to
I think we should just let LSU play UK 12 times a year, the bitching will not stop until that point anyhow.
Posted by Tammany Tom
Mandeville
Member since Jun 2004
4257 posts
Posted on 12/3/12 at 5:25 pm to
quote:

I think we should just let LSU play UK 12 times a year, the bitching will not stop until that point anyhow.


Well, here in the real world they just get dropped from our schedule (2012) and get added to yours (2013). Kinda like UGA gets dropped from yours (2012) and gets added to ours (2013).
Page 1 2 3 4
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 4Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter