Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

Does kicking LSU out negate SEC’s TV contracts?

Posted on 9/8/26 at 9:33 pm
Posted by Tigerholic
Member since Sep 2006
2518 posts
Posted on 9/8/26 at 9:33 pm
NM
Posted by Crimson Wraith
Member since Jan 2014
30718 posts
Posted on 9/8/26 at 9:34 pm to
Negative.
Posted by MrWalkingMan
Republic of West Florida
Member since Aug 2010
8699 posts
Posted on 9/8/26 at 9:38 pm to
It would be renegotiated. But outside of the tv deal, you have advertisers, stadium sponsors, ticket holders, NIL agreements, and many other deals that all lose value by going from a 9-game to an 8-game conference schedule. Not to mention schedules, travel, and institutional and private investment in sports other than football. It would all have to be re-worked.

The downstream effects would be a colossal shite show, and the SEC would be opening themselves up to litigation from everyone with even a fraction of a stake
This post was edited on 9/8/26 at 9:40 pm
Posted by gumbeaux
Member since Jun 2004
5551 posts
Posted on 9/8/26 at 9:41 pm to
And this isn’t just about football. It transcends to all sports.
Posted by howieshoodlums
Member since Dec 2016
1010 posts
Posted on 9/8/26 at 9:41 pm to
No when ESPN tries to renegotiate and brings up losing LSU then the SEC says oh yeah and we also added Texas and Oklahoma so we think you owe us a little more money.
Posted by joshnorris14
Florida
Member since Jan 2009
47509 posts
Posted on 9/8/26 at 9:44 pm to
The answer to this question is "no".
Posted by pankReb
Defending National Champs Fan
Member since Mar 2009
73589 posts
Posted on 9/8/26 at 9:44 pm to
quote:

No when ESPN tries to renegotiate and brings up losing LSU then the SEC says oh yeah and we also added Texas and Oklahoma so we think you owe us a little more money.


Really kills the LSU argument about the current TV exposure. They already added a lot more than what would be lost.
Posted by hoojy
In the fridge with my hot sauce.
Member since Nov 2013
12011 posts
Posted on 9/8/26 at 9:45 pm to
Not with the pro-rata I wouldn't think. We're not being paid more with UT and OU in our conference atm.
Posted by Tigerholic
Member since Sep 2006
2518 posts
Posted on 9/8/26 at 9:46 pm to
ESPN added $ when Texas and Oklahoma were added so they can push to take it away.
Posted by geauxbrown
Louisiana
Member since Oct 2006
29290 posts
Posted on 9/8/26 at 9:47 pm to
quote:

LSU then the SEC says oh yeah and we also added Texas and Oklahoma


Were they not already in the conference when the present contract was signed?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter