Started By
Message
re: Does anyone really believe Auburn isn't dirty?
Posted on 1/23/11 at 6:35 pm to Draconian Sanctions
Posted on 1/23/11 at 6:35 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
Nobody tried to bring us down
It says on your little avatar thing that you are an SMU fan...is this true or do you just admire their cheating?
0
Posted on 1/23/11 at 6:35 pm to arwicklu
quote:
I think most of the major programs are dirty. Auburn looks like they are dirtier than most but I know guys at University of Houston that were getting money and they aren't even a big program. If UH players are getting the hundred dollar handshakes, then who knows what goes on elsewhere. It is really hard to stop boosters.
Again I would point to the 60 in a 55 vs 90 in a 55 analogy
Posted on 1/23/11 at 6:37 pm to nativetiger
The fact that you are having to use the word "believe" shows that this is very much in the eye of the beholder...that there isn't evidence to tell anyone anything definitively. We Auburn folks believe what we like and haters will believe what they like. If evidence never surfaces, haters gonna hate and they'll keep right on hating. The only way we all get on the same page is if evidence does comes to light that proves Auburn paid for Cam.
I don't believe it and I don't think it happened but it IS feasible that the type of booster Cecil was looking for at state, was found by him at Auburn. There isn't any evidence to support this but it is feasible.
What is NOT feasible at all is that Auburn is a dirty program that has been buying players for years. I'm sorry...we can agree to disagree on the feasible but anyone who honestly thinks that Auburn has been paying players for years without being caught or even investigated for 20 years, is either an idiot or completely delusional.
I honestly think that the Blue Tuna premise and entire thread probably looks a lot like threads discussing the holocaust and 9/11 being hoaxes. If you present opinions and leading sub-circumstantial evidence to support a hypothesis without presenting mitigating opinions and evidence, you can make a case for ANYTHING.
Try me. I will make a case for anything in this manner...that when unopposed and unmitigated will seem compelling. Mickey Mouse is actually our lord and savior. Sound ridiculous? Pitch it the way Blue Tuna pitched Auburn's grand conspiracy of evil and I'm telling you, a case can be made.
I don't believe it and I don't think it happened but it IS feasible that the type of booster Cecil was looking for at state, was found by him at Auburn. There isn't any evidence to support this but it is feasible.
What is NOT feasible at all is that Auburn is a dirty program that has been buying players for years. I'm sorry...we can agree to disagree on the feasible but anyone who honestly thinks that Auburn has been paying players for years without being caught or even investigated for 20 years, is either an idiot or completely delusional.
I honestly think that the Blue Tuna premise and entire thread probably looks a lot like threads discussing the holocaust and 9/11 being hoaxes. If you present opinions and leading sub-circumstantial evidence to support a hypothesis without presenting mitigating opinions and evidence, you can make a case for ANYTHING.
Try me. I will make a case for anything in this manner...that when unopposed and unmitigated will seem compelling. Mickey Mouse is actually our lord and savior. Sound ridiculous? Pitch it the way Blue Tuna pitched Auburn's grand conspiracy of evil and I'm telling you, a case can be made.
Posted on 1/23/11 at 6:37 pm to nativetiger
quote:
there are a lot of people who really had nothing against auburn who think the whole cam newton mess looks dirty
certainly the means case at alabama was evidence of them significantly cheating - but that's a deflection argument IMO
So you admit that I'm right? Thanks...
if by right you mean alabama cheated with means and auburn probably cheated with cam?
then we agree completely on those points
Posted on 1/23/11 at 6:42 pm to molsusports
quote:
if by right you mean alabama cheated with means and auburn probably cheated with cam?
then we agree completely on those points
Think versus know.....distinction noted...
Posted on 1/23/11 at 6:44 pm to molsusports
quote:
1. alabama didn't have the Greatest Player In The History of College Football playing for them
Did cam give you some of that money to suck on his cock so hard, really dude, you need to let go of cams nuts..
Posted on 1/23/11 at 6:44 pm to DaBike
quote:
There is a lot of smoke. More than you see coming from anywhere else……
This means nothing.
I dont think any program is clean, including AU.
Posted on 1/23/11 at 6:46 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
Nobody tried to bring us down
Kentucky and Arkansas did it on the field
Posted on 1/23/11 at 6:47 pm to tkane311
quote:
The fact that you are having to use the word "believe" shows that this is very much in the eye of the beholder...that there isn't evidence to tell anyone anything definitively
Posted on 1/23/11 at 6:48 pm to The Nino
quote:
Kentucky and Arkansas did it on the field
is that the best you got?
Posted on 1/23/11 at 6:49 pm to The Nino
I'm all for Auburn being innocent until proven guilty, but I hear Auburn fans saying that all this dirty talk is because they won the NC and Cam was the best player. Alabama had Mark Ingram and nothing like this occurred and Texas had Vince Young and nothing like this happened.
Posted on 1/23/11 at 6:50 pm to The Nino
You are all fricking stupid. Auburn going from worse to first is a red flag for dirt being done...but who cares. They will be insignificant next year.
Trooper Taylor better hope his lawsuit against AU School systems works out because he along with Chizik, and one-hit wonder Gus will be looking for new jobs within 3 years
Trooper Taylor better hope his lawsuit against AU School systems works out because he along with Chizik, and one-hit wonder Gus will be looking for new jobs within 3 years
Posted on 1/23/11 at 6:50 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
Kentucky and Arkansas did it on the fieldquote:
is that the best you got?
That's what everyone was asking LSU
Posted on 1/23/11 at 6:51 pm to BayouBengalBoi
All teams are dirty, Au is fricking corrupt. There's a difference.
Posted on 1/23/11 at 6:52 pm to Draconian Sanctions
Thanks OP for bring out the cockroaches..
Posted on 1/23/11 at 6:52 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
Draconian Sanctions
Ah...how very quippy and witty you are. See if you can be witty enough to produce some evidence? No?
Hey...at least you are entertaining.
Posted on 1/23/11 at 6:52 pm to BayouBengalBoi
quote:
You are all fricking stupid. Auburn going from worse to first is a red flag for dirt being done..
Isnt' that what LSU did when Saban got there? I don't remember you guys being shite before he came to town....
Posted on 1/23/11 at 6:54 pm to BayouBengalBoi
quote:
You are all fricking stupid. Auburn going from worse to first is a red flag for dirt being done
Alabama 2007 7-6 (5th West)
Alabama 2008 12-2 (1st West)
Posted on 1/23/11 at 6:55 pm to tkane311
quote:
Ah...how very quippy and witty you are. See if you can be witty enough to produce some evidence? No?
Posted on 1/23/11 at 6:55 pm to Robin Masters
quote:
All teams are dirty, Au is fricking corrupt. There's a difference.
True...if you buy into the Blue Tuna theory...which of course makes you some combination of beyond stupid, or delusional. If you tell me which, I will agree with you if it keeps you from beating your wife or lighting your trailer on fire.
Page 3 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News