Started By
Message
0
Posted on 4/26/12 at 8:45 am to NYCAuburn
quote:
it was a cheap shot,
no it wasnt.
quote:
Bear didnt care though, but dodd dwelled on it rather than moving on.
not accurate at all.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted on 4/26/12 at 8:45 am to WG_Dawg
quote:
I think GT regrets it because it would bring more prestige to their wretched, pathetic program. However, for a school as craptastic as theirs,
Tech's all-time record and bowl record is pretty similar to UGA's and Tech's won more National Titles and won one more recently.
Posted on 4/26/12 at 8:46 am to genro
quote:
Tech's all-time record and bowl record is pretty similar to UGA's and Tech's
No its not
Posted on 4/26/12 at 8:46 am to secfan123
quote:
no it wasnt.
Oh I didnt know you were taught to tackle with your elbow to the face. Interdasting
Posted on 4/26/12 at 8:47 am to parkjas2001
Yes it is.
ETA: Tech 690 wins, UGA 748 wins. 58 more wins over a 120-year period is not that much. Tech 42 bowl appearances, UGA 45.
And as I said, Tech has more NC's and more recently won one.
ETA: Tech 690 wins, UGA 748 wins. 58 more wins over a 120-year period is not that much. Tech 42 bowl appearances, UGA 45.
And as I said, Tech has more NC's and more recently won one.
This post was edited on 4/26/12 at 8:51 am
Posted on 4/26/12 at 8:47 am to NYCAuburn
quote:
Oh I didnt know you were taught to tackle with your elbow to the face. Interdasting
If you're going to spout stuff, you should probably at least know what you're talking about. He wasnt tackling graning.
Posted on 4/26/12 at 8:48 am to genro
quote:
Yes it is.
Do you know what GT all-time record is? Its barely above .500. UGA is in the Top 12.
Posted on 4/26/12 at 8:50 am to genro
quote:
Tech's all-time record and bowl record is pretty similar to UGA's
Is it? Tech isn't really close to us in wins, and they DAMN sure aren't close to us in the all time series.
quote:
Tech's won more National Titles
We've won 5, I don't know how many they've won. And most of theirs were like pre 30s I believe.
quote:
won one more recently
They had a split title in 1990, big deal. That doesn't change the fact that they're largely irrelevant in college football.
Posted on 4/26/12 at 8:52 am to secfan123
I thought Dodd was pissed about the Bear blatantly cheating and everyone turning a blind eye to it.
Posted on 4/26/12 at 8:53 am to WG_Dawg
quote:
That doesn't change the fact that they're largely irrelevant in college football.
You just described your team for the past 3 seasons.
Posted on 4/26/12 at 8:53 am to WG_Dawg
quote:
We've won 5,
Your school claims 2. This says you've won 2. And it's generally pretty liberal - it gives Bama 13.
LINK
quote:
parkjas
quote:No, it's a LOT closer to UGA's percentage than it is to .500
Its barely above .500
This post was edited on 4/26/12 at 8:55 am
Posted on 4/26/12 at 8:53 am to secfan123
quote:
If you're going to spout stuff, you should probably at least know what you're talking about. He wasnt tackling graning.
Blocking him, whatever, you still dont elbow or forearm to the face, it's cheap. It was how some football was played then, trying to punish the other team by hurting them. Alabama, along with other teams, did it more than most. It was how the bear played ball
Posted on 4/26/12 at 8:54 am to WDE24
quote:
I thought Dodd was pissed about the Bear blatantly cheating and everyone turning a blind eye to it.
no. he caught bear fricking his wife and bear winked at him as he strolled out.
Posted on 4/26/12 at 8:55 am to NYCAuburn
quote:
Blocking him, whatever, you still dont elbow or forearm to the face, it's cheap. It was how some football was played then, trying to punish the other team by hurting them. Alabama, along with other teams, did it more than most. It was how the bear played ball
like i said, figure out what you're talking about first, then come back.
btw, bear won a libel case when they tried to print that he taught dirty tactics.
Posted on 4/26/12 at 8:56 am to secfan123
quote:
like i said, figure out what you're talking about first, then come back.
Please gve me the bama spin on this then
Posted on 4/26/12 at 8:56 am to genro
I didn't bother clicking the link but I'm sure I know what it'll say.
We claim 2 'concensus' titles, in 42 and 80.
Then the site is wrong. If bama has won 13, then we've won 5 going by the same standards. If you count bama's legit ones (which would still be very high, what is it 8?) then we would count 2. You can't do it both ways at the same time though.
quote:
Your school claims 2
We claim 2 'concensus' titles, in 42 and 80.
quote:
it gives Bama 13
Then the site is wrong. If bama has won 13, then we've won 5 going by the same standards. If you count bama's legit ones (which would still be very high, what is it 8?) then we would count 2. You can't do it both ways at the same time though.
Posted on 4/26/12 at 8:57 am to Broski
quote:
You just described your team for the past 3 seasons
And I described tech's program since the last world war.
And I would hardly count winning the east and being 30 minutes from an SEC title as irrelevant.
Posted on 4/26/12 at 8:59 am to WG_Dawg
You missed the point. It counts ALL of them. It doesn't do it both ways.
Page 2 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News