Started By
Message
Posted on 9/5/14 at 3:41 pm to fullOshot
No
Heisman = overrated anyway
Heisman = overrated anyway
Posted on 9/5/14 at 4:06 pm to fullOshot
Yes. If Colt didn't get pushed around by Nebraska, I'd have said he deserved it.
Ingram beat Tebow, Tebow didn't look great against Bama.
No defensive player deserve the Heisman if DT didn't win it.
Gerhart played weaker teams.
To me, it was Ingram or Colt. If Colt had lit up Nebraska, I'd call Ingram's Heisman a sham.
Ingram beat Tebow, Tebow didn't look great against Bama.
No defensive player deserve the Heisman if DT didn't win it.
Gerhart played weaker teams.
To me, it was Ingram or Colt. If Colt had lit up Nebraska, I'd call Ingram's Heisman a sham.
Posted on 9/5/14 at 4:09 pm to fullOshot
No. Rolando was our best player. Should have gone to him.
Posted on 9/5/14 at 4:11 pm to Irons Puppet
quote:
5 games with less than 100 yards rushing is not Heisman worthy
This is not even worthy of all conference, usually, but he has two stiff arm trophies.
1972 159 867 5.5 3
1973 247 1,577 6.4 7
1974 256 1,695 6.6 12
1975 262 1,450 5.5 4[5]
Posted on 9/5/14 at 4:27 pm to StopRobot
StopRobot
What exactly are you implying, the vast majority of posters on this thread and apparently you,have all seemed to have taken the topic the wrong way. I have not yet voiced my opinion on the topic at hand, but somehow the low IQ of some posters have apparently been trying to prove my opinion wrong
What exactly are you implying, the vast majority of posters on this thread and apparently you,have all seemed to have taken the topic the wrong way. I have not yet voiced my opinion on the topic at hand, but somehow the low IQ of some posters have apparently been trying to prove my opinion wrong
Posted on 9/5/14 at 4:33 pm to AllBamaDoesIsWin
This guy gets it.
Tebow and Suh were never going to win it. Colt threw his chances away during the Big 12 title game against Nebraska.
The late push went to TG. Stats were the battle cry. People should look at the voting.
Of the 6 zones Ingram won 4. TG won 1(PAC). The fact it was close was a joke.
Tebow and Suh were never going to win it. Colt threw his chances away during the Big 12 title game against Nebraska.
The late push went to TG. Stats were the battle cry. People should look at the voting.
Of the 6 zones Ingram won 4. TG won 1(PAC). The fact it was close was a joke.
Posted on 9/5/14 at 4:44 pm to fullOshot
Ingram fumbled the game away against Tennessee
Posted on 9/5/14 at 4:50 pm to fullOshot
Oklahoma St. should have won it.
Posted on 9/5/14 at 4:53 pm to fullOshot
Preciate your interest in our Heisman winner.
Posted on 9/5/14 at 5:28 pm to fullOshot
quote:
Do you think Mark Ingram was the best choice for the Heisman in 2009
Yep
quote:
1. Closest vote in history by 28 points
So. Still won.
quote:
2. Runner up (Toby Gerhart) had 1871 rushing yards and 28 TDs for season vs Ingram's 1678 rushing and 17 TDs for season
Ingram also had 32 rec 334 and 3 TDs. That put his total over 2000 yards and 20 TDs. Gerhart still had about equal total yards and more TDs, but he was on a 5 loss team.
Ingram was the driving force on that offense to an undefeated season. McElroy was a game manager, and Richardson was a firmly placed backup. There was really no one else legit enough to win it.
Posted on 9/5/14 at 5:29 pm to SwaggerCopter
quote:
Toby got screwed. Stanford had a special year that was less expected than Alabama's year.
Stanford lost 5 games and Bama was undefeated with Ingram and the defense as the driving force.
Posted on 9/5/14 at 5:33 pm to camdonspicolli
quote:
I mean Toby Gerhart was the better choice stat wise but ingram was on a nation championship team and that tends to swing voters
You cant look at it just stat wise, if you did, the guy from Northern Illinois would have won at least once the past two years. What I hate, is that Winston and Manziel came along at the worst time for that kid. I mean, he was the whole offense on that shitty arse team.
Back to top
