Started By
Message

re: Do new decades end with a zero or a one?

Posted on 5/15/25 at 12:49 pm to
Posted by southernboisb
Member since Dec 2012
9233 posts
Posted on 5/15/25 at 12:49 pm to
quote:

3 BC 2 BC 1 BC 1 AD 2 AD


This makes this debate even more confusing.
Posted by BigBro
Member since Jul 2021
19489 posts
Posted on 5/15/25 at 12:58 pm to
quote:

This makes this debate even more confusing.

maybe.. maybe not..

1 AD
2 AD
3 AD
4 AD
5 AD
6 AD
7 AD
8 AD
9 AD
10 AD

= 1st decade in the AD time period

Carry that forward and decades begin with a 1.

Posted by AUreo
Member since Jul 2021
2344 posts
Posted on 5/15/25 at 3:29 pm to
UGay football is all they got; it’s near-elite football and the rest is mediocre at best..what a waste of an athletic dep.
Posted by djsdawg
Member since Apr 2015
39281 posts
Posted on 5/15/25 at 3:31 pm to
quote:

UGay football is all they got; it’s near-elite football and the rest is mediocre at best..what a waste of an athletic dep.


Even if this were true, I would not care, but What is the baseball team ranked?
Posted by EulerRules
Member since Dec 2019
1820 posts
Posted on 5/15/25 at 5:18 pm to
quote:

At the start of time, the first 365 days occurred in the 1st year; BUT we don’t acknowledge COMPLETION of the year until the 366th day.

So, that time span, while being IN the 1st year would be called “Year 0”.


Years are measurements of the passage of time. The standard is Year 1 AD STARTED with the birth of Jesus Christ. That year is not considered year 0 by any historian in Western Europe or the Americas. Now many wishing to avoid any connection to Jesus Christ and AD (Anno Domini = Year of Our Lord) designate it 1 CE (Common Era), yet they mark its beginning with the birth of Jesus Christ (major fail on their part).
None of this time discussion matters, because there is no such thing as time. Read the circuitous definitions of "time" and "indefinite". Each term is used to define the other. The same circuitous logic is found in the definitions of "time" and of "progress". That is because no one can accurately describe "time", and that is because it doesn't exist. It was created in the imagination of human beings. It is a dimensionless parameter. Once you realize time is a figment of man's imagination, then it's easy to understand how God (if you are a theist or deist) and the Universe "always" existed. "Always" is a redundant, meaningless adverb in this context; existence is the only objective reality with regards to God and to the Universe..
Posted by Foots51
Salem. Al
Member since Sep 2022
293 posts
Posted on 5/23/25 at 7:00 pm to
It's not really logic. It's math unless the 1st decade after the birth of our Lord only had 9 years.
Decade------ 10.
Posted by Lonnie Utah
Utah!
Member since Jul 2012
31568 posts
Posted on 5/23/25 at 7:06 pm to
quote:

Are you really trying to say that the number twenty is not in the twenties, but the number thirty is?



Shhhhh. He's a UGA fan.....
Posted by Foots51
Salem. Al
Member since Sep 2022
293 posts
Posted on 5/23/25 at 7:21 pm to
A decade could actually refer to any 10-year period. But, as far as the calendar is concerned, the year starting with the birth of our Lord, was year 1. The first decade from that point would be years 1-10, unless of course, the first decade AD only had 9 years,
Posted by UFFan
Planet earth, Milky Way Galaxy
Member since Aug 2016
2543 posts
Posted on 5/23/25 at 7:24 pm to
Centuries and decades really start in years ending with a 1, due to the fact that there was never a year 0. The first decade AD was the years 1-10, the second decade was AD 11-20, etc.

But most people incorrectly believe that decades start in the year ending with 0.
Page 1 2 3 4
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 4Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter