Started By
Message
re: Danny Sheridan has the info
Posted on 8/17/11 at 6:22 pm to AlxTgr
Posted on 8/17/11 at 6:22 pm to AlxTgr
quote:
OK, here's why that does not work for me. I cannot imagine why anyone would think Cam should have been ruled ineligible. That event has nothing to do with what the NCAA might have known. It was a decision made based soley upon information provided by Auburn. That's how those items work. Compliance is not involved or consulted.
While true, a party with an axe to grind isn't always logical..
0
Posted on 8/17/11 at 6:23 pm to AlxTgr
quote:
It was a decision made based soley upon information provided by Auburn.
And Mississippi State. They had already turned over their info by then as well.
Posted on 8/17/11 at 6:25 pm to DonAUfan
quote:OK, but to whom? Eligibility or compliance?
And Mississippi State. They had already turned over their info by then as well.
Posted on 8/17/11 at 6:30 pm to AlxTgr
quote:
OK, but to whom? Eligibility or compliance?
They said they turned over all info they had to the NCAA. I am sure they would use all info they had to make the decision. It may be 2 different departments but they are all still the NCAA and I doubt they would withhold info from each other.
Posted on 8/17/11 at 6:33 pm to DonAUfan
quote:As crazy and messed up as the NCAA is, they had begun their own investigation and would not have declared Cam eligible if they had verifiable information at that time that he had been paid. It doesn't matter which department of the NCAA was in possession of the info. I get the dichotomy of the roles between enforcement and eligibility, but they aren't going to withhold information from each other. Also, the NCAA isn't going to ignore information hey already have and solely rely on the information provided by the school.
They said they turned over all info they had to the NCAA. I am sure they would use all info they had to make the decision. It may be 2 different departments but they are all still the NCAA and I doubt they would withhold info from each other.
This post was edited on 8/17/11 at 6:37 pm
Posted on 8/17/11 at 6:35 pm to DonAUfan
quote:
@Matt_HayesSN
Matt Hayes
Danny Sheridan claims he saw Bigfoot!. Sheridan attorney: "You don't have to answer that."
Posted on 8/17/11 at 6:36 pm to WDE24
quote:
solely rely on the information provided by the school.
They wouldn't clear a kid, let him take and pass classes, and then declare him ineligble, thus forcing him to jr college either. Oh, wait.. sorry Alfy, they would.
Posted on 8/17/11 at 6:37 pm to Alahunter
Posted on 8/17/11 at 6:37 pm to 12
I'm stealing that, but don't worry, I won't reveal my source.
This post was edited on 8/17/11 at 6:38 pm
Posted on 8/17/11 at 6:38 pm to 12
Posted on 8/17/11 at 6:38 pm to 12
That's great.
Posted on 8/17/11 at 6:41 pm to Alahunter
I come up with something once a year. That was it.
Posted on 8/17/11 at 6:45 pm to 1999
A YouTube reply to Danny Sheridan:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5hfYJsQAhl0
A YouTube reply to Bama and other schools fans that were waiting on ol' Danny to drop the bomb:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&v=M5QGkOGZubQ
And, finally, a YouTube summation (in 6 seconds) of le affaire de Sheridan:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ytCEuuW2_A
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5hfYJsQAhl0
A YouTube reply to Bama and other schools fans that were waiting on ol' Danny to drop the bomb:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&v=M5QGkOGZubQ
And, finally, a YouTube summation (in 6 seconds) of le affaire de Sheridan:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ytCEuuW2_A
Posted on 8/17/11 at 6:48 pm to WDE24
quote:
It may be 2 different departments but they are all still the NCAA and I doubt they would withhold info from each other.
It's not that it's withheld. They do not communicate, at all. Nothing is shared.
quote:
As crazy and messed up as the NCAA is, they had begun their own investigation and would not have declared Cam eligible if they had verifiable information at that time that he had been paid. It doesn't matter which department of the NCAA was in possession of the info. I get the dichotomy of the roles between enforcement and eligibility, but they aren't going to withhold information from each other. Also, the NCAA isn't going to ignore information hey already have and solely rely on the information provided by the school.
This just isn't how it works. They might as well be on different continents speaking different languages.
Posted on 8/17/11 at 6:48 pm to blzr
quote:
DanWetzel Dan Wetzel
Danny Sheridan should apologize to Cam Newton. This is absurd and it's not fair to the player
One of the Yahoo Angels of Death demanding an apology on behalf of Cam Newton!
Posted on 8/17/11 at 6:51 pm to beatbammer
quote:
Dan Wetzel
quote:
Cam Newton does everything fast. This scandal even got here ahead of schedule. Expect the same old head-in-the-sand, blame-game excuses from the suits to follow just as quickly.
Posted on 8/17/11 at 6:54 pm to AlxTgr
quote:You need to let Emmert know that.
This just isn't how it works.
Posted on 8/17/11 at 6:56 pm to WDE24
Or you could provide a link showing where Emmert has said compliance and the investigative part of the NCAA work hand in hand when determining eligibility of athletes when schools give compliance the info of their investigations.
Posted on 8/17/11 at 6:58 pm to Alahunter
quote:
Cam Newton does everything fast. This scandal even got here ahead of schedule. Expect the same old head-in-the-sand, blame-game excuses from the suits to follow just as quickly
Link?
Posted on 8/17/11 at 7:00 pm to AlxTgr
quote:
It's not that it's withheld. They do not communicate, at all. Nothing is shared.
quote:
This just isn't how it works. They might as well be on different continents speaking different languages.
Q: What’s the difference between the enforcement process and student-athlete reinstatement process?
A: They run independently of each other. The reinstatement process is dealing with the individual student-athlete and his or her eligibility. The enforcement process focuses on institutional involvement or culpability. At times, the student-athlete eligibility issues become ripe within the context of an enforcement investigation. When this occurs, the school and the enforcement staff agree upon facts that are then presented to the reinstatement staff specific to the student-athlete’s eligibility.
Read more here
Page 66 of 72
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News