Started By
Message
re: Dan Mullen getting unnecessary criticism?
Posted on 10/31/13 at 6:42 pm to Eric Nies Grind Time
Posted on 10/31/13 at 6:42 pm to Eric Nies Grind Time
2
Posted on 10/31/13 at 6:44 pm to darkhorse
quote:
So now you change your point.
What was my first point, and what was my second point? Show me where I changed.
quote:
DL vs DL?? Can we start there?
You're so fricking hung up on recruiting rankings and using that as your evidence for a person's talent. And it's pretty nice how you've conveniently ignored things that don't support your argument.
Yeah, your DL has more stars than theirs. There are other position groups where you can't say the same, though such as at QB and WR.
In a nutshell, your argument is that your team is talented, and Dan Mullen hasn't developed or done enough with that talent. You haven't yet proven that. Great, you have some highly recruited defensive linemen. That, itself, doesn't a talented team make.
(Hint: Mississippi State isn't that talented. Sorry.)
Posted on 10/31/13 at 6:46 pm to darkhorse
quote:
Wish it coulda been minor like the alleged rape of a mentally disabled girl.
Posted on 10/31/13 at 6:52 pm to TheCheshireHog
quote:
Like the SECr tried to tell you two years ago but you wouldn't listen. Your fan base will get the taste of a few bowl games and want more and better bowls. That's whats happening now.
This is true and could be said for almost all programs that have improved from a dismal state, such as Bama in the early 2000's or LSU in the 90's. Human nature to be entitled to more when we should be grateful for what we have.
Posted on 10/31/13 at 6:53 pm to darkhorse
Engie, I think you have him pegged..
This post was edited on 10/31/13 at 6:59 pm
Posted on 10/31/13 at 6:59 pm to DCRebel
quote:
You're so fricking hung up on recruiting rankings and using that as your evidence for a person's talent
Then you and all other Um fans will agree that your top 10 class really didn't mean crap! Glad to know that.
quote:
And it's pretty nice how you've conveniently ignored things that don't support your argument.
I have not ignored a damn thing. I started with DL because that's what you listed first!
quote:
Yeah, your DL has more stars than theirs. There are other position groups where you can't say the same,
Are you sure?
QB:
Franklin.. 4*, Russell 4*..
Shall we continue?
Posted on 10/31/13 at 7:01 pm to darkhorse
I think we shall..
The only thing they actually have higher right now is receivers.
The only thing they actually have higher right now is receivers.
This post was edited on 10/31/13 at 7:06 pm
Posted on 10/31/13 at 7:13 pm to DCRebel
quote:
You're so fricking hung up on recruiting rankings and using that as your evidence for a person's talent.
Wow this coming from an Ole Miss fan? I didn't ever think I would see the day...
Posted on 10/31/13 at 7:14 pm to Hardy_Har
Is DCRebel their Coonass?
Posted on 10/31/13 at 7:14 pm to DynastyDawg
It's only good when you ARE addressing Ole Miss recruiting brah..
Posted on 10/31/13 at 7:30 pm to Hardy_Har
Exactly!!!
The point is valid that we should be winning more games with the talent we have. It is a matter of coaching.
The point is valid that we should be winning more games with the talent we have. It is a matter of coaching.
Posted on 10/31/13 at 8:01 pm to darkhorse
quote:
darkhorse
That is disgusting
Posted on 10/31/13 at 8:02 pm to DynastyDawg
quote:I don't think so. DC is a pseudo-intellectual and Coonass is nuts.
Is DCRebel their Coonass?
Posted on 10/31/13 at 8:03 pm to SwayzeBalla
This thread has longevity 
Posted on 10/31/13 at 8:24 pm to darkhorse
I think MSU could honestly just put their playbook on shuffle and have similar to this year type results..
Posted on 10/31/13 at 8:53 pm to Hardy_Har
dan mulleb is a frickin piece of shite and i hate him
Posted on 10/31/13 at 11:17 pm to The Nino
quote:
longevity
Viagra! It's great!
Posted on 11/1/13 at 7:13 am to darkhorse
quote:
Then you and all other Um fans will agree that your top 10 class really didn't mean crap! Glad to know that.
Yeah, until they actually performed on the field (which they have).
quote:
Franklin.. 4*, Russell 4*..
Franklin was a top five prospect at his position. Russell wasn't. You're almost comparing apples to oranges at this point. And, again, "so and so has X stars" is NOT a good indicator of his talent level. Hell, the argument you're trying to make is fricking PROOF of that. This isn't to say that stars don't matter (they're accurate more often than they aren't), but they're far from scientific, and can't really be used as a proxy for overall football talent.
Franklin > Russell, both as a recruit and as an actual football player.
Again, Missouri is a more talented football team than Mississippi State. That is why they're playing better football right now.
You still haven't really proven that State's a talented football team, which is a major crux of your argument.
Posted on 11/1/13 at 7:17 am to DynastyDawg
quote:
Is DCRebel their Coonass?
God no. Far from it. How long have you been here? Have you not read anything I've posted? Can you not objectively discern rational thought from paranoid delusion?
How am I different from Clitass? Let's see, for starters I never abandoned my kids and moved to another state entirely, nor do I live out my frustrations as a failed high school football coach (and parent) via my internet persona.
Coonass is a straight up conspiracy theorist. I am perhaps one of the last posters on this board to offer up the sort of paranoid bullshite he and his Elite Dawgs comrades spew forth on a daily basis.
This post was edited on 11/1/13 at 7:20 am
Posted on 11/1/13 at 7:19 am to darkhorse
quote:
The point is valid that we should be winning more games with the talent we have.
What talent?
Page 12 of 14
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News