re: Damnit Charles, why'd you have to go and do-it?

I honestly can't answer about what further the boycotters may want - but if I had a guess I would say "an apology". Yeah, may sound stupid, but instead of the company acting like Dylan Mulvaney has leprosy and they don't know him... the boycotters would probably like hearing, "Sorry... we will stop pandering and just want you to enjoy our product." But I doubt that will happen.

quote:

---

That's the type of thing a cünt says. Can I call you a cünt? I make 1 middle of the road reply (calling out both the left and the right for rioting) and you have this bullshite reply. And then you continue in this thread with 14 more replies. I don't care about anyone boycotting beer. It is their right. I only care about pointing out what a cünt you are right

---

quote:

---

Yeah that’s obviously dumb too. Why you would believe I’d be okay with that is beyond me. Is this the conservatives way to get back at the liberals? All boycotts are dumb with unintended consequences. Each their own. I enjoy watching people act like little bitches over something stupid. I just mind my own business and let little things like that not bother me.

---

So you want to reply to me with a post that wasn’t middle of the road at all.

quote:

---

The boycott is dumb? It is their money. They can spend it anyway they want to. Blocking streets is dumb. Burning police cars is dumb. Overrunning barricades and breaking into buildings is dumb. Buying Coors over bud light? Who the f cares?

---

And I agreed with you.

You just expected me to not reply when you insinuated I was liberal leaning for calling the boycott dumb? All boycotts are dumb.

quote:

---

And you pulled "muh both sides" nonsense. For someone who supposedly doesn't "care" you sure are posting a lot in this thread.

---

Where’d I post it?

And I am replying to those that reply to my posts. I don’t even click on the threads. I’ve relayed the same information or if someone asks a question I answer it.

I’m replying to you because you’re saying I posted something I didn’t. It’s what you posted.

In fact, dcbl just quoted it above. You posted it. And I agreed and yet you’re attacking me. Confusing times.

quote:

---

I honestly can't answer about what further the boycotters may want - but if I had a guess I would say "an apology"

---

I’d say cleaning house and ditching the lgbtq campaign is a “corporate” apology for sure. They are in damage control right now. You got those that care too much not willing to buy their product again so if they go ahead and apologize and piss the temperamental left off too…. They’ll really be letting go of their workforce.

This never would have happened if the Busch family hadn't sold it to the germans

quote:

---

You just expected me to not reply when you insinuated I was liberal leaning

---

Reread this post I am replying to.

Where did I insinuate anything?

Since you are struggling, I suggest you read each and every sentence and look at the actual words.

quote:

---

meansonny

---

100% sure we have the same views.

You brought up the left boycotting(which I also view being dumb).

quote:

---

I think you're triggered on getting called out for thinking that boycotting and burning down cities are the same thing.

---

Except I’ve never said that. I asked you to show me where I said that and you haven’t. You know why?

Because I didn’t say that.

All I’ve said is boycotting is dumb. Weird.

"We" don't like corporate America checking off boxes to appease the public. When it comes to men wearing dresses you can go ahead and double up on "we don't like"

Stop the bullshite